Meaning not yet researched.
Rosaline: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 85 in 2025. Its best rank was #763 in 1928.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #763 in 1928; #2,192 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Rosaline in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#2,192 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1928, at #763.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Rosaline: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 85 girls in 2025. Peak: #763 in 1928 · most girls in one year: 88 (1928).
In 2025, 85 US girls were named Rosaline, making it the 2,192nd most common girls’ name of the year, up 813 places from #3,005 in 2024. That is 30 more than the 55 girls named Rosaline in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #763, reached in 1928. That year also had the most girls given the name: 88. For comparison, it was #4,476 in 2015 and #1,469 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Rosaline in 128 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1891 with 6 babies. In all, 3,984 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 1920s, with 754 babies named Rosaline.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 581 US girls were named Rosaline; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 85. In 2025 that was about 1 in 18,909 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Rosaline ranked highest in Ohio in 2025, at #1,413 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Rosalyn (23,278 babies since 1880), Rosalina (5,773 babies since 1880) and Rosalynn (3,533 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Rosealine are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Rosealine (10).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Rosaline in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 47 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 6 | #1,413 | — |
| Florida | 7 | #1,840 | — |
| Texas | 11 | #2,014 | — |
| California | 8 | #2,451 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85 | #2,192 | — | — |
| 2024 | 55 | #3,005 | — | — |
| 2023 | 68 | #2,611 | — | — |
| 2022 | 70 | #2,550 | — | — |
| 2021 | 56 | #2,992 | — | — |
| 2020 | 46 | #3,384 | — | — |
| 2019 | 58 | #2,887 | — | — |
| 2018 | 45 | #3,482 | — | — |
| 2017 | 55 | #3,010 | — | — |
| 2016 | 43 | #3,650 | — | — |
| 2015 | 32 | #4,476 | — | — |
| 2014 | 33 | #4,433 | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | #5,971 | — | — |
| 2012 | 14 | #8,548 | — | — |
| 2011 | 20 | #6,518 | — | — |
| 2010 | 23 | #5,938 | — | — |
| 2009 | 19 | #7,013 | — | — |
| 2008 | 11 | #10,653 | — | — |
| 2007 | 7 | #15,155 | — | — |
| 2006 | 14 | #8,624 | — | — |
| 2005 | 18 | #6,759 | — | — |
| 2004 | 11 | #9,775 | — | — |
| 2003 | 8 | #12,167 | — | — |
| 2001 | 5 | #17,371 | — | — |
| 2000 | 10 | #9,735 | — | — |
| 1999 | 11 | #8,675 | — | — |
| 1998 | 10 | #9,133 | — | — |
| 1997 | 8 | #10,588 | — | — |
| 1996 | 5 | #15,331 | — | — |
| 1995 | 6 | #13,011 | — | — |
| 1994 | 13 | #6,993 | — | — |
| 1993 | 17 | #5,627 | — | — |
| 1992 | 10 | #8,586 | — | — |
| 1991 | 6 | #12,740 | — | — |
| 1990 | 14 | #6,386 | — | — |
| 1988 | 13 | #6,179 | — | — |
| 1987 | 9 | #7,851 | — | — |
| 1986 | 8 | #8,316 | — | — |
| 1985 | 12 | #5,959 | — | — |
| 1984 | 16 | #4,678 | — | — |
| 1983 | 8 | #7,866 | — | — |
| 1982 | 8 | #8,041 | — | — |
| 1981 | 16 | #4,685 | — | — |
| 1980 | 26 | #3,297 | — | — |
| 1979 | 17 | #4,377 | — | — |
| 1978 | 24 | #3,257 | — | — |
| 1977 | 16 | #4,381 | — | — |
| 1976 | 16 | #4,112 | — | — |
| 1975 | 17 | #3,903 | — | — |
| 1974 | 19 | #3,529 | — | — |
| 1973 | 22 | #3,094 | — | — |
| 1972 | 14 | #4,252 | — | — |
| 1971 | 19 | #3,473 | — | — |
| 1970 | 31 | #2,434 | — | — |
| 1969 | 21 | #2,989 | — | — |
| 1968 | 29 | #2,280 | — | — |
| 1967 | 20 | #2,850 | — | — |
| 1966 | 29 | #2,239 | — | — |
| 1965 | 31 | #2,145 | — | — |
| 1964 | 29 | #2,296 | — | — |
| 1963 | 32 | #2,124 | — | — |
| 1962 | 22 | #2,649 | — | — |
| 1961 | 31 | #2,139 | — | — |
| 1960 | 22 | #2,632 | — | — |
| 1959 | 35 | #1,909 | — | — |
| 1958 | 30 | #2,060 | — | — |
| 1957 | 23 | #2,404 | — | — |
| 1956 | 30 | #1,995 | — | — |
| 1955 | 38 | #1,687 | — | — |
| 1954 | 42 | #1,576 | — | — |
| 1953 | 34 | #1,732 | — | — |
| 1952 | 35 | #1,673 | — | — |
| 1951 | 34 | #1,658 | — | — |
| 1950 | 40 | #1,469 | — | — |
| 1949 | 31 | #1,732 | — | — |
| 1948 | 29 | #1,768 | — | — |
| 1947 | 33 | #1,691 | — | — |
| 1946 | 33 | #1,551 | — | — |
| 1945 | 31 | #1,475 | — | — |
| 1944 | 42 | #1,233 | — | — |
| 1943 | 36 | #1,390 | — | — |
| 1942 | 37 | #1,342 | — | — |
| 1941 | 36 | #1,289 | — | — |
| 1940 | 28 | #1,465 | — | — |
| 1939 | 40 | #1,156 | — | — |
| 1938 | 49 | #1,028 | — | — |
| 1937 | 38 | #1,178 | — | — |
| 1936 | 37 | #1,181 | — | — |
| 1935 | 47 | #1,016 | — | — |
| 1934 | 39 | #1,145 | — | — |
| 1933 | 54 | #933 | — | — |
| 1932 | 47 | #1,041 | — | — |
| 1931 | 61 | #882 | — | — |
| 1930 | 67 | #888 | — | — |
| 1929 | 67 | #873 | — | — |
| 1928 | 88 | #763 | — | — |
| 1927 | 64 | #950 | — | — |
| 1926 | 75 | #860 | — | — |
| 1925 | 85 | #805 | — | — |
| 1924 | 86 | #807 | — | — |
| 1923 | 78 | #834 | — | — |
| 1922 | 64 | #927 | — | — |
| 1921 | 71 | #883 | — | — |
| 1920 | 76 | #831 | — | — |
| 1919 | 67 | #856 | — | — |
| 1918 | 69 | #866 | — | — |
| 1917 | 63 | #876 | — | — |
| 1916 | 59 | #885 | — | — |
| 1915 | 55 | #890 | — | — |
| 1914 | 32 | #1,076 | — | — |
| 1913 | 33 | #941 | — | — |
| 1912 | 21 | #1,172 | — | — |
| 1911 | 22 | #953 | — | — |
| 1910 | 15 | #1,199 | — | — |
| 1909 | 15 | #1,094 | — | — |
| 1908 | 10 | #1,423 | — | — |
| 1907 | 10 | #1,360 | — | — |
| 1906 | 15 | #998 | — | — |
| 1905 | 14 | #1,051 | — | — |
| 1904 | 11 | #1,158 | — | — |
| 1903 | 8 | #1,416 | — | — |
| 1902 | 8 | #1,417 | — | — |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,638 | — | — |
| 1900 | 10 | #1,301 | — | — |
| 1899 | 10 | #1,086 | — | — |
| 1897 | 5 | #1,756 | — | — |
| 1894 | 5 | #1,673 | — | — |
| 1891 | 6 | #1,312 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).