Meaning not yet researched.
Rosalee: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 270 in 2025. Its best rank was #405 in 1938.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #405 in 1938; #954 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Rosalee in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#954 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1938, at #405.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Rosalee: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 270 girls in 2025. Peak: #405 in 1938 · most girls in one year: 346 (2020).
In 2025, 270 US girls were named Rosalee, making it the 954th most common girls’ name of the year, down 1 place from #953 in 2024. That is 4 fewer than the 274 girls named Rosalee in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #405, reached in 1938. The most girls given the name in a single year was 346, in 2020. For comparison, it was #1,123 in 2015 and #848 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Rosalee in 140 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1880 with 5 babies. In all, 12,900 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 2,080 babies named Rosalee.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 2,862 US girls were named Rosalee; the busiest of those years was 2020, with 346. In 2025 that was about 1 in 5,953 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Rosalee ranked highest in Kentucky in 2025, at #326 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Rosalie (84,145 babies since 1880) and Rosalia (10,664 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Rosielee, Rosaleah and Roselea are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Rosielee (115), Rosaleah (108), Roselea (45).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Rosalee in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 27 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | 14 | #326 | — |
| West Virginia | 5 | #360 | — |
| Oklahoma | 8 | #536 | #875 |
| Michigan | 13 | #631 | #889 |
| Ohio | 15 | #662 | #731 |
| Indiana | 9 | #714 | #1,230 |
| Oregon | 5 | #714 | — |
| Missouri | 8 | #716 | — |
| Tennessee | 10 | #743 | — |
| North Carolina | 12 | #820 | #884 |
| Louisiana | 5 | #881 | — |
| Colorado | 6 | #883 | — |
| Pennsylvania | 10 | #913 | #929 |
| Alabama | 5 | #924 | #789 |
| Minnesota | 5 | #970 | — |
| Arizona | 6 | #1,014 | — |
| Florida | 14 | #1,101 | #1,801 |
| Georgia | 8 | #1,183 | #1,155 |
| Washington | 5 | #1,214 | #1,081 |
| New York | 12 | #1,225 | #1,471 |
| Texas | 21 | #1,257 | #1,113 |
| Virginia | 5 | #1,342 | #929 |
| California | 16 | #1,467 | #1,524 |
| Illinois | 5 | #1,585 | #1,146 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 270 | #954 | — | — |
| 2024 | 274 | #953 | — | — |
| 2023 | 240 | #1,049 | — | — |
| 2022 | 280 | #961 | — | — |
| 2021 | 343 | #814 | — | — |
| 2020 | 346 | #788 | — | — |
| 2019 | 285 | #929 | — | — |
| 2018 | 322 | #844 | — | — |
| 2017 | 254 | #1,024 | — | — |
| 2016 | 248 | #1,054 | — | — |
| 2015 | 228 | #1,123 | — | — |
| 2014 | 213 | #1,162 | — | — |
| 2013 | 192 | #1,245 | — | — |
| 2012 | 136 | #1,600 | — | — |
| 2011 | 102 | #1,949 | — | — |
| 2010 | 100 | #2,007 | — | — |
| 2009 | 59 | #2,960 | — | — |
| 2008 | 38 | #4,158 | — | — |
| 2007 | 40 | #3,966 | — | — |
| 2006 | 42 | #3,719 | — | — |
| 2005 | 46 | #3,357 | — | — |
| 2004 | 40 | #3,680 | — | — |
| 2003 | 41 | #3,513 | — | — |
| 2002 | 36 | #3,713 | — | — |
| 2001 | 40 | #3,407 | — | — |
| 2000 | 30 | #4,158 | — | — |
| 1999 | 41 | #3,177 | — | — |
| 1998 | 28 | #4,114 | — | — |
| 1997 | 34 | #3,428 | — | — |
| 1996 | 32 | #3,553 | — | — |
| 1995 | 23 | #4,478 | — | — |
| 1994 | 29 | #3,768 | — | — |
| 1993 | 37 | #3,149 | — | — |
| 1992 | 29 | #3,758 | — | — |
| 1991 | 34 | #3,276 | — | — |
| 1990 | 35 | #3,209 | — | — |
| 1989 | 37 | #2,972 | — | — |
| 1988 | 31 | #3,208 | — | — |
| 1987 | 45 | #2,354 | — | — |
| 1986 | 44 | #2,330 | — | — |
| 1985 | 33 | #2,846 | — | — |
| 1984 | 38 | #2,507 | — | — |
| 1983 | 41 | #2,346 | — | — |
| 1982 | 37 | #2,569 | — | — |
| 1981 | 46 | #2,221 | — | — |
| 1980 | 39 | #2,475 | — | — |
| 1979 | 31 | #2,841 | — | — |
| 1978 | 48 | #2,007 | — | — |
| 1977 | 32 | #2,649 | — | — |
| 1976 | 41 | #2,127 | — | — |
| 1975 | 40 | #2,157 | — | — |
| 1974 | 23 | #3,072 | — | — |
| 1973 | 32 | #2,389 | — | — |
| 1972 | 29 | #2,498 | — | — |
| 1971 | 31 | #2,462 | — | — |
| 1970 | 23 | #3,004 | — | — |
| 1969 | 42 | #1,951 | — | — |
| 1968 | 34 | #2,081 | — | — |
| 1967 | 33 | #2,065 | — | — |
| 1966 | 29 | #2,238 | — | — |
| 1965 | 49 | #1,614 | — | — |
| 1964 | 48 | #1,683 | — | — |
| 1963 | 58 | #1,475 | — | — |
| 1962 | 40 | #1,822 | — | — |
| 1961 | 46 | #1,692 | — | — |
| 1960 | 47 | #1,650 | — | — |
| 1959 | 67 | #1,311 | — | — |
| 1958 | 49 | #1,539 | — | — |
| 1957 | 63 | #1,339 | — | — |
| 1956 | 64 | #1,309 | — | — |
| 1955 | 72 | #1,183 | — | — |
| 1954 | 47 | #1,479 | — | — |
| 1953 | 75 | #1,129 | — | — |
| 1952 | 86 | #1,016 | — | — |
| 1951 | 121 | #815 | — | — |
| 1950 | 109 | #848 | — | — |
| 1949 | 135 | #735 | — | — |
| 1948 | 142 | #704 | — | — |
| 1947 | 163 | #654 | — | — |
| 1946 | 157 | #629 | — | — |
| 1945 | 144 | #600 | — | — |
| 1944 | 169 | #561 | — | — |
| 1943 | 199 | #535 | — | — |
| 1942 | 202 | #524 | — | — |
| 1941 | 186 | #507 | — | — |
| 1940 | 200 | #482 | — | — |
| 1939 | 206 | #467 | — | — |
| 1938 | 274 | #405 | — | — |
| 1937 | 153 | #539 | — | — |
| 1936 | 130 | #583 | — | — |
| 1935 | 149 | #529 | — | — |
| 1934 | 159 | #512 | — | — |
| 1933 | 151 | #519 | — | — |
| 1932 | 169 | #504 | — | — |
| 1931 | 171 | #493 | — | — |
| 1930 | 177 | #503 | — | — |
| 1929 | 176 | #512 | — | — |
| 1928 | 161 | #550 | — | — |
| 1927 | 174 | #539 | — | — |
| 1926 | 151 | #579 | — | — |
| 1925 | 138 | #625 | — | — |
| 1924 | 152 | #608 | — | — |
| 1923 | 167 | #562 | — | — |
| 1922 | 145 | #599 | — | — |
| 1921 | 156 | #579 | — | — |
| 1920 | 182 | #522 | — | — |
| 1919 | 141 | #596 | — | — |
| 1918 | 140 | #603 | — | — |
| 1917 | 149 | #555 | — | — |
| 1916 | 101 | #683 | — | — |
| 1915 | 108 | #635 | — | — |
| 1914 | 100 | #564 | — | — |
| 1913 | 73 | #609 | — | — |
| 1912 | 61 | #637 | — | — |
| 1911 | 35 | #739 | — | — |
| 1910 | 46 | #628 | — | — |
| 1909 | 33 | #704 | — | — |
| 1908 | 39 | #612 | — | — |
| 1907 | 34 | #646 | — | — |
| 1906 | 22 | #790 | — | — |
| 1905 | 33 | #617 | — | — |
| 1904 | 32 | #608 | — | — |
| 1903 | 19 | #808 | — | — |
| 1902 | 24 | #711 | — | — |
| 1901 | 10 | #1,123 | — | — |
| 1900 | 24 | #757 | — | — |
| 1899 | 19 | #750 | — | — |
| 1898 | 16 | #881 | — | — |
| 1897 | 21 | #696 | — | — |
| 1896 | 18 | #783 | — | — |
| 1895 | 12 | #973 | — | — |
| 1894 | 13 | #897 | — | — |
| 1893 | 9 | #1,080 | — | — |
| 1892 | 6 | #1,421 | — | — |
| 1891 | 12 | #833 | — | — |
| 1890 | 16 | #688 | — | — |
| 1888 | 10 | #881 | — | — |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,254 | — | — |
| 1885 | 9 | #787 | — | — |
| 1880 | 5 | #923 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).