Meaning not yet researched.
Reta: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 0 in 2025. Its best rank was #451 in 1896.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Fewer than five US girls were given it in 2025. It peaked at #451 in 1896. No US babies were recorded with the name Reta in 2025.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
Given to fewer than five US girls in 2025; it peaked at #451 in 1896.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Reta: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 0 girls in 2025. Peak: #451 in 1896 · most girls in one year: 192 (1946).
Fewer than five US girls were named Reta in 2025, so it does not appear in that year’s SSA list for girls. Its best rank for girls was #451, reached in 1896. The most girls given the name in a single year was 192, in 1946. For comparison, it was unranked (under five girls) in 2015 and #663 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Reta in 112 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1880 with 5 babies. In all, 8,616 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 1930s, with 1,651 babies named Reta.
In none of the 10 years from 2016 to 2025 were five or more US girls named Reta.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Rita (285,230 babies since 1880), Retha (10,597 babies since 1880), Retta (3,399 babies since 1880) and Reatha (2,624 babies since 1880).
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Reta in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 5 | #16,019 | — | — |
| 1994 | 6 | #13,031 | — | — |
| 1993 | 9 | #9,342 | — | — |
| 1992 | 5 | #14,984 | — | — |
| 1991 | 7 | #11,200 | — | — |
| 1990 | 6 | #12,534 | — | — |
| 1989 | 9 | #8,574 | — | — |
| 1988 | 6 | #11,400 | — | — |
| 1987 | 8 | #8,556 | — | — |
| 1986 | 6 | #10,549 | — | — |
| 1985 | 5 | #12,008 | — | — |
| 1984 | 9 | #7,265 | — | — |
| 1983 | 15 | #4,832 | — | — |
| 1982 | 9 | #7,328 | — | — |
| 1981 | 11 | #6,204 | — | — |
| 1980 | 17 | #4,470 | — | — |
| 1979 | 13 | #5,335 | — | — |
| 1978 | 8 | #7,462 | — | — |
| 1977 | 11 | #5,794 | — | — |
| 1976 | 17 | #3,921 | — | — |
| 1975 | 19 | #3,609 | — | — |
| 1974 | 16 | #3,989 | — | — |
| 1973 | 22 | #3,092 | — | — |
| 1972 | 21 | #3,150 | — | — |
| 1971 | 17 | #3,765 | — | — |
| 1970 | 33 | #2,343 | — | — |
| 1969 | 22 | #2,895 | — | — |
| 1968 | 30 | #2,235 | — | — |
| 1967 | 33 | #2,061 | — | — |
| 1966 | 36 | #1,945 | — | — |
| 1965 | 43 | #1,733 | — | — |
| 1964 | 47 | #1,701 | — | — |
| 1963 | 49 | #1,644 | — | — |
| 1962 | 74 | #1,291 | — | — |
| 1961 | 81 | #1,231 | — | — |
| 1960 | 80 | #1,226 | — | — |
| 1959 | 113 | #995 | — | — |
| 1958 | 129 | #904 | — | — |
| 1957 | 131 | #894 | — | — |
| 1956 | 148 | #816 | — | — |
| 1955 | 175 | #716 | — | — |
| 1954 | 163 | #724 | — | — |
| 1953 | 141 | #775 | — | — |
| 1952 | 133 | #782 | — | — |
| 1951 | 151 | #711 | — | — |
| 1950 | 166 | #663 | — | — |
| 1949 | 170 | #638 | — | — |
| 1948 | 158 | #667 | — | — |
| 1947 | 174 | #634 | — | — |
| 1946 | 192 | #580 | — | — |
| 1945 | 127 | #653 | — | — |
| 1944 | 149 | #602 | — | — |
| 1943 | 164 | #589 | — | — |
| 1942 | 132 | #651 | — | — |
| 1941 | 142 | #591 | — | — |
| 1940 | 156 | #553 | — | — |
| 1939 | 167 | #519 | — | — |
| 1938 | 164 | #530 | — | — |
| 1937 | 143 | #569 | — | — |
| 1936 | 150 | #532 | — | — |
| 1935 | 176 | #476 | — | — |
| 1934 | 180 | #478 | — | — |
| 1933 | 167 | #495 | — | — |
| 1932 | 160 | #519 | — | — |
| 1931 | 174 | #490 | — | — |
| 1930 | 170 | #517 | — | — |
| 1929 | 151 | #558 | — | — |
| 1928 | 152 | #573 | — | — |
| 1927 | 144 | #592 | — | — |
| 1926 | 121 | #659 | — | — |
| 1925 | 161 | #564 | — | — |
| 1924 | 167 | #563 | — | — |
| 1923 | 128 | #656 | — | — |
| 1922 | 166 | #553 | — | — |
| 1921 | 149 | #593 | — | — |
| 1920 | 172 | #544 | — | — |
| 1919 | 147 | #572 | — | — |
| 1918 | 131 | #621 | — | — |
| 1917 | 122 | #620 | — | — |
| 1916 | 147 | #548 | — | — |
| 1915 | 132 | #562 | — | — |
| 1914 | 84 | #632 | — | — |
| 1913 | 61 | #670 | — | — |
| 1912 | 69 | #587 | — | — |
| 1911 | 42 | #674 | — | — |
| 1910 | 54 | #563 | — | — |
| 1909 | 40 | #621 | — | — |
| 1908 | 49 | #525 | — | — |
| 1907 | 48 | #520 | — | — |
| 1906 | 36 | #601 | — | — |
| 1905 | 37 | #578 | — | — |
| 1904 | 23 | #751 | — | — |
| 1903 | 25 | #677 | — | — |
| 1902 | 32 | #589 | — | — |
| 1901 | 38 | #496 | — | — |
| 1900 | 32 | #632 | — | — |
| 1899 | 21 | #699 | — | — |
| 1898 | 21 | #742 | — | — |
| 1897 | 30 | #551 | — | — |
| 1896 | 42 | #451 | — | — |
| 1895 | 28 | #574 | — | — |
| 1894 | 30 | #534 | — | — |
| 1893 | 14 | #819 | — | — |
| 1892 | 24 | #576 | — | — |
| 1891 | 11 | #880 | — | — |
| 1890 | 15 | #717 | — | — |
| 1889 | 17 | #637 | — | — |
| 1888 | 12 | #788 | — | — |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,253 | — | — |
| 1885 | 5 | #1,169 | — | — |
| 1883 | 6 | #907 | — | — |
| 1880 | 5 | #921 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).