Girl

Raleigh

Meaning not yet researched.

2025 rank
#1,894
104 girls
2015
#1,475
rank
1950
—
not ranked

Raleigh: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 104 in 2025. Its best rank was #1,382 in 2016.

US births per year · SSA card applications

Peaked at #1,382 in 2016; #1,894 in 2025. About 62% of babies named Raleigh in 2025 were girls.

Baby name · US data 1880–2025

#1,894 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 2016, at #1,382.

Babies in 2025
168
Since 1880
12,336
Years on record
146

Babies named Raleigh, every year since 1880

Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.

Girls Boys

Raleigh: US girls and boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 104 girls in 2025. Peak: #1,382 in 2016 · most girls in one year: 170 (2016).

About the name Raleigh

In 2025, 104 US girls were named Raleigh, making it the 1,894th most common girls’ name of the year, up 28 places from #1,922 in 2024. That is 0 more than the 104 girls named Raleigh in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #1,382, reached in 2016. That year also had the most girls given the name: 170. For comparison, it was #1,475 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.

In 2025, 64 US boys were named Raleigh, making it the 2,222nd most common boys’ name of the year, up 60 places from #2,282 in 2024. That is 1 more than the 63 boys named Raleigh in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #357, reached in 1891. The most boys given the name in a single year was 139, in 1921. For comparison, it was #1,886 in 2015 and #703 in 1950.

Social Security card records list Raleigh in every one of the 146 years from 1880 to 2025; in 1880 there were 14 babies with the name. In all, 12,336 US babies have been given the name, 25% of them girls and 75% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 2,225 babies named Raleigh.

Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 1,373 US girls were named Raleigh; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 170. In 2025 that was about 1 in 15,454 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.

Among the states, Raleigh ranked highest in South Carolina in 2025, at #752 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Rayleigh (3,098 babies since 1880) and Raeleigh (2,371 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Raliegh, Raileigh and Raleah are summarised on this page.

Meaning

Meaning not yet researched.

We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.

Related spellings

Rare spellings summarised here: Raliegh (264), Raileigh (253), Raleah (6), Raleigha (5).

Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.

Nicknames

No nicknames listed for Raleigh in the open dataset we use.

Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).

Raleigh by state, 2025

US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 45 are not listed.

StateBirths 2025Rank 2025Rank 2015
South Carolina6#752#642
Louisiana6#757#480
Alabama5#921#539
Georgia9#1,048#587
Florida7#1,833—
Texas5#3,686#1,394

Rank by year

Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.

CSV
YearGirlsGirls rankBoysBoys rank
2025104#1,89464#2,222
2024104#1,92263#2,282
2023126#1,65370#2,110
2022119#1,75065#2,233
2021136#1,55263#2,252
2020147#1,46682#1,825
2019161#1,40199#1,648
2018149#1,48093#1,699
2017157#1,44679#1,867
2016170#1,38289#1,751
2015156#1,47578#1,886
2014122#1,723113#1,454
2013119#1,74275#1,893
2012108#1,86981#1,830
201199#1,99888#1,699
2010105#1,92384#1,775
200994#2,14350#2,549
200886#2,28765#2,116
200792#2,17458#2,272
200647#3,45753#2,371
200548#3,25159#2,105
200447#3,25359#2,045
200339#3,64256#2,050
200228#4,47564#1,810
200125#4,80032#2,913
200026#4,62948#2,123
199929#4,05647#2,053
199818#5,75047#2,037
199731#3,68659#1,690
199623#4,54851#1,811
199531#3,56348#1,828
199419#5,18658#1,599
199328#3,85652#1,692
199230#3,64970#1,358
199123#4,45058#1,523
199024#4,19548#1,696
198917#5,21949#1,636
198815#5,52652#1,475
198719#4,42768#1,171
198611#6,47244#1,529
19859#7,40052#1,346
19849#7,25157#1,222
198311#6,11546#1,392
198210#6,72549#1,356
1981——32#1,801
1980——48#1,372
1979——43#1,429
197811#5,85939#1,499
19775#10,80042#1,424
19766#8,91747#1,301
1975——42#1,357
1974——34#1,514
19736#8,14135#1,452
1972——48#1,189
19717#7,16255#1,105
19705#8,95759#1,068
19695#8,36054#1,060
1968——55#1,003
1967——43#1,146
1966——51#1,024
1965——70#879
1964——51#1,068
1963——50#1,088
19625#7,33673#895
1961——71#911
1960——56#1,029
19598#4,93476#885
1958——91#785
1957——75#878
1956——82#829
1955——80#823
1954——84#783
1953——87#763
1952——98#713
1951——91#729
1950——96#703
1949——94#712
1948——100#676
19475#5,938110#660
19465#5,541100#646
1945——104#598
19446#4,453100#617
19437#4,103108#610
1942——127#547
1941——93#635
1940——87#644
1939——95#600
1938——90#631
1937——84#649
1936——78#673
1935——95#596
1934——107#572
1933——100#581
1932——80#688
1931——97#601
1930——90#651
1929——91#646
1928——93#651
1927——125#552
1926——101#626
1925——100#638
1924——138#542
19235#5,557113#595
1922——131#553
1921——139#530
1920——134#530
1919——97#617
1918——116#563
1917——116#543
1916——102#570
1915——124#500
1914——98#496
1913——70#518
1912——68#480
1911——33#522
1910——22#633
1909——30#468
1908——19#608
1907——25#469
1906——15#636
1905——31#378
1904——20#489
1903——18#518
1902——25#412
1901——19#449
1900——31#411
1899——14#543
1898——17#517
1897——22#407
1896——17#515
1895——16#522
1894——19#459
1893——18#445
1892——20#440
1891——24#357
1890——18#431
1889——21#402
1888——10#687
1887——15#452
1886——23#366
1885——22#383
1884——20#412
1883——17#445
1882——15#484
1881——11#557
1880——14#499

About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).