Meaning not yet researched.
Logan: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 5,576 in 2025. Its best rank was #5 in 2017.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #5 in 2017; #53 in 2025. About 88% of babies named Logan in 2025 were boys.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#53 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 2017, at #5.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Logan: US boys and girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 5,576 boys in 2025. Peak: #5 in 2017 · most boys in one year: 15,331 (2007).
In 2025, 5,576 US boys were named Logan, making it the 53rd most common boys’ name of the year, down 8 places from #45 in 2024. That is 721 fewer than the 6,297 boys named Logan in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #5, reached in 2017. The most boys given the name in a single year was 15,331, in 2007. For comparison, it was #14 in 2015 and #1,016 in 1950.
In 2025, 775 US girls were named Logan, making it the 402nd most common girls’ name of the year, down 12 places from #390 in 2024. That is 33 fewer than the 808 girls named Logan in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #257, reached in 1996. The most girls given the name in a single year was 1,106, in 2017. For comparison, it was #393 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.
Social Security card records list Logan in every one of the 146 years from 1880 to 2025; in 1880 there were 13 babies with the name. In all, 419,837 US babies have been given the name, 7.6% of them girls and 92% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2000s, with 142,404 babies named Logan.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 92,549 US boys were named Logan; the busiest of those years was 2017, with 14,061. In 2025 that was about 1 in 306 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Logan ranked highest in Delaware in 2025, at #12 for boys there. It was in the top 100 in 47 states (counting DC). Related spellings in the SSA files include Logen (1,482 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Logann, Logyn and Logun are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in English. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Logann (648), Logyn (610), Logun (386), Login (137), Lohgan (88), Logon (81), Logynn (63), Loganne (44), Logahn (12), Loegan (12), Loagan (10), Loggan (7), and more.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Logan in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so every state is listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | 30 | #12 | #15 |
| New Jersey | 235 | #22 | #17 |
| Massachusetts | 175 | #24 | #11 |
| New York | 410 | #28 | #19 |
| Utah | 101 | #29 | #14 |
| Connecticut | 81 | #33 | #10 |
| District of Columbia | 20 | #33 | #32 |
| Hawaii | 19 | #34 | #9 |
| Illinois | 215 | #38 | #11 |
| Pennsylvania | 254 | #39 | #6 |
| New Hampshire | 30 | #39 | #6 |
| Rhode Island | 20 | #41 | #4 |
| Maryland | 106 | #45 | #2 |
| Colorado | 113 | #47 | #11 |
| Idaho | 36 | #50 | #7 |
| Florida | 363 | #51 | #19 |
| Washington | 127 | #51 | #7 |
| California | 670 | #52 | #27 |
| Maine | 20 | #52 | #15 |
| Arizona | 123 | #53 | #17 |
| Virginia | 144 | #54 | #16 |
| Ohio | 187 | #55 | #7 |
| Montana | 18 | #57 | #10 |
| Mississippi | 38 | #58 | #19 |
| Kentucky | 72 | #59 | #26 |
| Nevada | 45 | #60 | #13 |
| Kansas | 53 | #61 | #12 |
| Michigan | 137 | #61 | #11 |
| Vermont | 8 | #61 | #11 |
| North Carolina | 180 | #61 | #15 |
| Georgia | 163 | #62 | #18 |
| New Mexico | 27 | #63 | #26 |
| Wisconsin | 87 | #63 | #8 |
| Oregon | 57 | #65 | #14 |
| South Dakota | 17 | #66 | #16 |
| West Virginia | 26 | #69 | #46 |
| Alabama | 66 | #72 | #21 |
| South Carolina | 66 | #76 | #15 |
| Texas | 504 | #78 | #38 |
| Missouri | 78 | #79 | #14 |
| Iowa | 43 | #79 | #24 |
| Wyoming | 6 | #82 | #6 |
| Indiana | 90 | #85 | #28 |
| Minnesota | 70 | #87 | #17 |
| Tennessee | 89 | #99 | #24 |
| Louisiana | 50 | #99 | #13 |
| North Dakota | 12 | #100 | #20 |
| Nebraska | 24 | #110 | #31 |
| Oklahoma | 37 | #129 | #14 |
| Arkansas | 27 | #130 | #24 |
| Alaska | 7 | #130 | #15 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 775 | #402 | 5,576 | #53 |
| 2024 | 808 | #390 | 6,297 | #45 |
| 2023 | 858 | #356 | 6,706 | #39 |
| 2022 | 848 | #372 | 7,614 | #33 |
| 2021 | 1,035 | #313 | 8,836 | #21 |
| 2020 | 1,001 | #317 | 9,163 | #16 |
| 2019 | 996 | #322 | 10,571 | #16 |
| 2018 | 1,078 | #310 | 12,447 | #10 |
| 2017 | 1,106 | #292 | 14,061 | #5 |
| 2016 | 855 | #385 | 11,278 | #18 |
| 2015 | 835 | #393 | 12,939 | #14 |
| 2014 | 832 | #392 | 13,669 | #13 |
| 2013 | 707 | #432 | 12,366 | #18 |
| 2012 | 683 | #456 | 12,488 | #22 |
| 2011 | 551 | #526 | 12,999 | #21 |
| 2010 | 620 | #487 | 14,032 | #17 |
| 2009 | 684 | #455 | 14,467 | #17 |
| 2008 | 736 | #431 | 13,861 | #19 |
| 2007 | 708 | #455 | 15,331 | #17 |
| 2006 | 737 | #433 | 15,151 | #20 |
| 2005 | 759 | #410 | 13,475 | #26 |
| 2004 | 900 | #352 | 13,140 | #27 |
| 2003 | 885 | #352 | 13,187 | #28 |
| 2002 | 921 | #330 | 12,974 | #29 |
| 2001 | 1,042 | #305 | 12,710 | #29 |
| 2000 | 999 | #318 | 9,737 | #40 |
| 1999 | 1,073 | #289 | 9,136 | #42 |
| 1998 | 1,026 | #294 | 8,640 | #44 |
| 1997 | 1,067 | #275 | 8,620 | #42 |
| 1996 | 1,097 | #257 | 8,374 | #42 |
| 1995 | 1,041 | #264 | 6,953 | #51 |
| 1994 | 879 | #311 | 5,458 | #70 |
| 1993 | 790 | #333 | 4,844 | #76 |
| 1992 | 571 | #441 | 4,226 | #89 |
| 1991 | 512 | #476 | 3,893 | #94 |
| 1990 | 368 | #612 | 3,433 | #104 |
| 1989 | 341 | #623 | 3,281 | #104 |
| 1988 | 245 | #766 | 2,758 | #109 |
| 1987 | 135 | #1,112 | 1,951 | #144 |
| 1986 | 132 | #1,114 | 1,329 | #192 |
| 1985 | 90 | #1,421 | 995 | #233 |
| 1984 | 91 | #1,340 | 988 | #227 |
| 1983 | 88 | #1,363 | 780 | #265 |
| 1982 | 84 | #1,443 | 689 | #294 |
| 1981 | 86 | #1,427 | 693 | #290 |
| 1980 | 57 | #1,897 | 519 | #348 |
| 1979 | 47 | #2,133 | 468 | #370 |
| 1978 | 18 | #4,001 | 307 | #455 |
| 1977 | 12 | #5,389 | 203 | #593 |
| 1976 | 10 | #5,839 | 113 | #782 |
| 1975 | 8 | #6,858 | 85 | #898 |
| 1974 | 5 | #9,565 | 71 | #974 |
| 1973 | — | — | 68 | #984 |
| 1972 | 6 | #7,798 | 60 | #1,043 |
| 1971 | — | — | 55 | #1,104 |
| 1970 | — | — | 55 | #1,109 |
| 1969 | — | — | 49 | #1,120 |
| 1968 | — | — | 58 | #963 |
| 1967 | — | — | 52 | #1,013 |
| 1966 | — | — | 59 | #946 |
| 1965 | — | — | 48 | #1,075 |
| 1964 | — | — | 66 | #940 |
| 1963 | — | — | 46 | #1,145 |
| 1962 | — | — | 60 | #993 |
| 1961 | — | — | 50 | #1,113 |
| 1960 | — | — | 59 | #1,002 |
| 1959 | — | — | 54 | #1,056 |
| 1958 | — | — | 47 | #1,122 |
| 1957 | — | — | 44 | #1,177 |
| 1956 | — | — | 44 | #1,151 |
| 1955 | — | — | 65 | #925 |
| 1954 | — | — | 59 | #969 |
| 1953 | — | — | 58 | #945 |
| 1952 | — | — | 51 | #1,010 |
| 1951 | — | — | 62 | #895 |
| 1950 | — | — | 48 | #1,016 |
| 1949 | — | — | 53 | #951 |
| 1948 | — | — | 56 | #927 |
| 1947 | — | — | 59 | #911 |
| 1946 | — | — | 50 | #948 |
| 1945 | — | — | 49 | #924 |
| 1944 | — | — | 48 | #926 |
| 1943 | — | — | 54 | #914 |
| 1942 | — | — | 37 | #1,132 |
| 1941 | — | — | 45 | #958 |
| 1940 | — | — | 56 | #846 |
| 1939 | — | — | 45 | #940 |
| 1938 | — | — | 38 | #1,056 |
| 1937 | — | — | 38 | #1,046 |
| 1936 | — | — | 42 | #964 |
| 1935 | — | — | 43 | #977 |
| 1934 | — | — | 63 | #782 |
| 1933 | — | — | 60 | #796 |
| 1932 | — | — | 65 | #790 |
| 1931 | — | — | 44 | #1,007 |
| 1930 | — | — | 44 | #1,043 |
| 1929 | — | — | 69 | #777 |
| 1928 | — | — | 47 | #1,015 |
| 1927 | — | — | 65 | #835 |
| 1926 | — | — | 52 | #950 |
| 1925 | — | — | 80 | #726 |
| 1924 | — | — | 86 | #712 |
| 1923 | — | — | 61 | #878 |
| 1922 | — | — | 73 | #786 |
| 1921 | — | — | 86 | #702 |
| 1920 | — | — | 74 | #771 |
| 1919 | — | — | 81 | #694 |
| 1918 | — | — | 85 | #677 |
| 1917 | — | — | 94 | #613 |
| 1916 | — | — | 79 | #666 |
| 1915 | — | — | 55 | #829 |
| 1914 | — | — | 65 | #629 |
| 1913 | — | — | 38 | #770 |
| 1912 | — | — | 35 | #731 |
| 1911 | — | — | 17 | #809 |
| 1910 | — | — | 17 | #743 |
| 1909 | — | — | 18 | #646 |
| 1908 | — | — | 12 | #806 |
| 1907 | — | — | 8 | #1,058 |
| 1906 | — | — | 11 | #788 |
| 1905 | — | — | 19 | #540 |
| 1904 | — | — | 13 | #670 |
| 1903 | — | — | 12 | #683 |
| 1902 | — | — | 13 | #634 |
| 1901 | — | — | 8 | #819 |
| 1900 | — | — | 22 | #501 |
| 1899 | — | — | 10 | #686 |
| 1898 | — | — | 18 | #499 |
| 1897 | — | — | 16 | #507 |
| 1896 | — | — | 15 | #547 |
| 1895 | — | — | 15 | #543 |
| 1894 | — | — | 16 | #511 |
| 1893 | — | — | 15 | #490 |
| 1892 | — | — | 14 | #563 |
| 1891 | — | — | 15 | #464 |
| 1890 | — | — | 15 | #500 |
| 1889 | — | — | 32 | #309 |
| 1888 | — | — | 18 | #458 |
| 1887 | — | — | 29 | #308 |
| 1886 | — | — | 30 | #315 |
| 1885 | — | — | 32 | #304 |
| 1884 | — | — | 63 | #208 |
| 1883 | — | — | 20 | #389 |
| 1882 | — | — | 17 | #444 |
| 1881 | — | — | 13 | #496 |
| 1880 | — | — | 13 | #514 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).