Meaning not yet researched.
Lillia: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 55 in 2025. Its best rank was #719 in 1881.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #719 in 1881; #3,014 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Lillia in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#3,014 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1881, at #719.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Lillia: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 55 girls in 2025. Peak: #719 in 1881 · most girls in one year: 73 (2013).
In 2025, 55 US girls were named Lillia, making it the 3,014th most common girls’ name of the year, up 135 places from #3,149 in 2024. That is 4 more than the 51 girls named Lillia in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #719, reached in 1881. The most girls given the name in a single year was 73, in 2013. For comparison, it was #2,797 in 2015 and #3,829 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Lillia in 137 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1881 with 7 babies. In all, 2,633 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 600 babies named Lillia.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 502 US girls were named Lillia; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 64. In 2025 that was about 1 in 29,223 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Lilly (66,752 babies since 1880), Lilia (14,319 babies since 1880), Lillie (159,791 babies since 1880) and Lelia (15,645 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Lilleah are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Latin. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Lilleah (6).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Lillia in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 55 | #3,014 | — | — |
| 2024 | 51 | #3,149 | — | — |
| 2023 | 57 | #2,957 | — | — |
| 2022 | 56 | #2,981 | — | — |
| 2021 | 48 | #3,320 | — | — |
| 2020 | 39 | #3,759 | — | — |
| 2019 | 42 | #3,646 | — | — |
| 2018 | 45 | #3,470 | — | — |
| 2017 | 45 | #3,461 | — | — |
| 2016 | 64 | #2,726 | — | — |
| 2015 | 63 | #2,797 | — | — |
| 2014 | 69 | #2,573 | — | — |
| 2013 | 73 | #2,474 | — | — |
| 2012 | 70 | #2,587 | — | — |
| 2011 | 69 | #2,607 | — | — |
| 2010 | 60 | #2,887 | — | — |
| 2009 | 56 | #3,075 | — | — |
| 2008 | 68 | #2,708 | — | — |
| 2007 | 72 | #2,589 | — | — |
| 2006 | 61 | #2,872 | — | — |
| 2005 | 63 | #2,695 | — | — |
| 2004 | 59 | #2,768 | — | — |
| 2003 | 57 | #2,757 | — | — |
| 2002 | 31 | #4,140 | — | — |
| 2001 | 22 | #5,295 | — | — |
| 2000 | 33 | #3,840 | — | — |
| 1999 | 24 | #4,668 | — | — |
| 1998 | 36 | #3,396 | — | — |
| 1997 | 19 | #5,327 | — | — |
| 1996 | 24 | #4,395 | — | — |
| 1995 | 9 | #9,209 | — | — |
| 1994 | 8 | #10,121 | — | — |
| 1993 | 8 | #10,150 | — | — |
| 1992 | 8 | #10,039 | — | — |
| 1990 | 6 | #12,251 | — | — |
| 1989 | 9 | #8,445 | — | — |
| 1988 | 8 | #8,852 | — | — |
| 1986 | 7 | #9,110 | — | — |
| 1985 | 5 | #11,681 | — | — |
| 1984 | 8 | #7,822 | — | — |
| 1983 | 6 | #9,694 | — | — |
| 1982 | 7 | #8,770 | — | — |
| 1981 | 9 | #7,118 | — | — |
| 1980 | 8 | #7,812 | — | — |
| 1979 | 9 | #7,053 | — | — |
| 1977 | 6 | #9,123 | — | — |
| 1975 | 6 | #8,588 | — | — |
| 1972 | 8 | #6,288 | — | — |
| 1971 | 8 | #6,346 | — | — |
| 1970 | 6 | #7,574 | — | — |
| 1969 | 5 | #8,108 | — | — |
| 1968 | 8 | #5,420 | — | — |
| 1967 | 5 | #7,368 | — | — |
| 1966 | 6 | #6,224 | — | — |
| 1965 | 7 | #5,569 | — | — |
| 1964 | 5 | #7,342 | — | — |
| 1963 | 12 | #3,924 | — | — |
| 1962 | 7 | #5,592 | — | — |
| 1961 | 9 | #4,729 | — | — |
| 1960 | 10 | #4,329 | — | — |
| 1959 | 15 | #3,187 | — | — |
| 1958 | 14 | #3,311 | — | — |
| 1957 | 9 | #4,401 | — | — |
| 1956 | 9 | #4,331 | — | — |
| 1955 | 12 | #3,485 | — | — |
| 1954 | 9 | #4,146 | — | — |
| 1953 | 5 | #6,146 | — | — |
| 1952 | 9 | #3,989 | — | — |
| 1951 | 16 | #2,644 | — | — |
| 1950 | 9 | #3,829 | — | — |
| 1949 | 9 | #3,769 | — | — |
| 1948 | 10 | #3,490 | — | — |
| 1947 | 9 | #3,891 | — | — |
| 1946 | 7 | #4,238 | — | — |
| 1945 | 5 | #4,941 | — | — |
| 1944 | 7 | #3,910 | — | — |
| 1943 | 8 | #3,675 | — | — |
| 1942 | 8 | #3,595 | — | — |
| 1941 | 8 | #3,414 | — | — |
| 1940 | 12 | #2,500 | — | — |
| 1939 | 17 | #2,000 | — | — |
| 1938 | 12 | #2,516 | — | — |
| 1937 | 21 | #1,709 | — | — |
| 1936 | 11 | #2,613 | — | — |
| 1935 | 13 | #2,379 | — | — |
| 1934 | 10 | #2,844 | — | — |
| 1933 | 10 | #2,790 | — | — |
| 1932 | 13 | #2,435 | — | — |
| 1931 | 15 | #2,161 | — | — |
| 1930 | 12 | #2,621 | — | — |
| 1929 | 24 | #1,622 | — | — |
| 1928 | 17 | #2,147 | — | — |
| 1927 | 19 | #2,074 | — | — |
| 1926 | 12 | #2,807 | — | — |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,919 | — | — |
| 1924 | 22 | #1,901 | — | — |
| 1923 | 22 | #1,872 | — | — |
| 1922 | 17 | #2,233 | — | — |
| 1921 | 23 | #1,841 | — | — |
| 1920 | 20 | #1,988 | — | — |
| 1919 | 19 | #1,959 | — | — |
| 1918 | 17 | #2,158 | — | — |
| 1917 | 13 | #2,492 | — | — |
| 1916 | 18 | #1,916 | — | — |
| 1915 | 14 | #2,194 | — | — |
| 1914 | 11 | #2,199 | — | — |
| 1913 | 13 | #1,723 | — | — |
| 1912 | 12 | #1,673 | — | — |
| 1911 | 9 | #1,728 | — | — |
| 1910 | 14 | #1,244 | — | — |
| 1909 | 9 | #1,544 | — | — |
| 1908 | 12 | #1,240 | — | — |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,955 | — | — |
| 1906 | 12 | #1,132 | — | — |
| 1905 | 7 | #1,625 | — | — |
| 1904 | 7 | #1,576 | — | — |
| 1903 | 8 | #1,392 | — | — |
| 1902 | 6 | #1,714 | — | — |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,578 | — | — |
| 1900 | 9 | #1,379 | — | — |
| 1899 | 7 | #1,335 | — | — |
| 1898 | 10 | #1,147 | — | — |
| 1897 | 6 | #1,474 | — | — |
| 1896 | 12 | #981 | — | — |
| 1895 | 16 | #804 | — | — |
| 1894 | 7 | #1,297 | — | — |
| 1893 | 8 | #1,131 | — | — |
| 1892 | 7 | #1,228 | — | — |
| 1891 | 11 | #870 | — | — |
| 1889 | 7 | #1,087 | — | — |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,387 | — | — |
| 1887 | 7 | #993 | — | — |
| 1886 | 6 | #1,046 | — | — |
| 1885 | 8 | #822 | — | — |
| 1884 | 5 | #1,098 | — | — |
| 1883 | 7 | #792 | — | — |
| 1881 | 7 | #719 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).