Meaning not yet researched.
Enoch: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 348 in 2025. Its best rank was #202 in 1880.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #202 in 1880; #746 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Enoch in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#746 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1880, at #202.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Enoch: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 348 boys in 2025. Peak: #202 in 1880 · most boys in one year: 376 (2023).
In 2025, 348 US boys were named Enoch, making it the 746th most common boys’ name of the year, down 34 places from #712 in 2024. That is 24 fewer than the 372 boys named Enoch in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #202, reached in 1880. The most boys given the name in a single year was 376, in 2023. For comparison, it was #785 in 2015 and #830 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Enoch in every one of the 146 years from 1880 to 2025; in 1880 there were 60 babies with the name. In all, 13,118 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 2,772 babies named Enoch.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 3,279 US boys were named Enoch; the busiest of those years was 2023, with 376. In 2025 that was about 1 in 4,908 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Enoch ranked highest in Utah in 2025, at #446 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Enoc (1,381 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Enock and Enok are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Enock (106), Enok (55).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Enoch in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 27 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | 10 | #446 | #407 |
| Indiana | 14 | #494 | #747 |
| Ohio | 20 | #522 | #1,117 |
| Missouri | 10 | #571 | — |
| Tennessee | 12 | #607 | #486 |
| Pennsylvania | 15 | #613 | #667 |
| Kentucky | 6 | #648 | — |
| North Carolina | 14 | #658 | #675 |
| Minnesota | 7 | #669 | #554 |
| California | 41 | #671 | #674 |
| Arizona | 9 | #688 | #814 |
| Virginia | 10 | #694 | — |
| Washington | 9 | #702 | #722 |
| Colorado | 7 | #703 | #650 |
| Oklahoma | 5 | #729 | — |
| Michigan | 10 | #733 | #1,019 |
| Florida | 21 | #736 | #782 |
| Texas | 36 | #756 | #752 |
| Louisiana | 5 | #816 | — |
| Wisconsin | 5 | #817 | #794 |
| New Jersey | 7 | #855 | — |
| Illinois | 8 | #962 | #1,109 |
| New York | 10 | #1,152 | #1,273 |
| Georgia | 5 | #1,408 | #860 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 348 | #746 |
| 2024 | — | — | 372 | #712 |
| 2023 | — | — | 376 | #706 |
| 2022 | — | — | 307 | #811 |
| 2021 | — | — | 304 | #805 |
| 2020 | — | — | 297 | #785 |
| 2019 | — | — | 300 | #777 |
| 2018 | — | — | 318 | #746 |
| 2017 | — | — | 314 | #750 |
| 2016 | — | — | 343 | #713 |
| 2015 | — | — | 297 | #785 |
| 2014 | — | — | 337 | #715 |
| 2013 | — | — | 257 | #833 |
| 2012 | — | — | 196 | #1,008 |
| 2011 | — | — | 214 | #932 |
| 2010 | — | — | 196 | #1,000 |
| 2009 | — | — | 167 | #1,107 |
| 2008 | — | — | 158 | #1,147 |
| 2007 | — | — | 150 | #1,181 |
| 2006 | — | — | 124 | #1,324 |
| 2005 | — | — | 147 | #1,120 |
| 2004 | — | — | 134 | #1,167 |
| 2003 | — | — | 146 | #1,065 |
| 2002 | — | — | 139 | #1,079 |
| 2001 | — | — | 106 | #1,258 |
| 2000 | — | — | 108 | #1,238 |
| 1999 | — | — | 90 | #1,333 |
| 1998 | — | — | 75 | #1,482 |
| 1997 | — | — | 68 | #1,524 |
| 1996 | — | — | 73 | #1,427 |
| 1995 | — | — | 56 | #1,631 |
| 1994 | — | — | 76 | #1,340 |
| 1993 | — | — | 66 | #1,433 |
| 1992 | — | — | 58 | #1,528 |
| 1991 | — | — | 59 | #1,486 |
| 1990 | — | — | 68 | #1,354 |
| 1989 | — | — | 56 | #1,483 |
| 1988 | — | — | 48 | #1,532 |
| 1987 | — | — | 51 | #1,429 |
| 1986 | — | — | 50 | #1,405 |
| 1985 | — | — | 62 | #1,194 |
| 1984 | — | — | 51 | #1,303 |
| 1983 | — | — | 49 | #1,335 |
| 1982 | — | — | 70 | #1,090 |
| 1981 | — | — | 60 | #1,189 |
| 1980 | — | — | 59 | #1,189 |
| 1979 | — | — | 57 | #1,209 |
| 1978 | — | — | 73 | #1,021 |
| 1977 | — | — | 64 | #1,085 |
| 1976 | — | — | 72 | #982 |
| 1975 | — | — | 54 | #1,151 |
| 1974 | — | — | 76 | #936 |
| 1973 | — | — | 70 | #967 |
| 1972 | — | — | 41 | #1,311 |
| 1971 | — | — | 43 | #1,278 |
| 1970 | — | — | 54 | #1,121 |
| 1969 | — | — | 60 | #993 |
| 1968 | — | — | 36 | #1,263 |
| 1967 | — | — | 39 | #1,205 |
| 1966 | — | — | 41 | #1,168 |
| 1965 | — | — | 38 | #1,243 |
| 1964 | — | — | 39 | #1,243 |
| 1963 | — | — | 37 | #1,287 |
| 1962 | — | — | 60 | #990 |
| 1961 | — | — | 61 | #994 |
| 1960 | — | — | 44 | #1,183 |
| 1959 | — | — | 53 | #1,064 |
| 1958 | — | — | 54 | #1,042 |
| 1957 | — | — | 57 | #1,006 |
| 1956 | — | — | 67 | #911 |
| 1955 | — | — | 55 | #1,015 |
| 1954 | — | — | 60 | #956 |
| 1953 | — | — | 52 | #1,006 |
| 1952 | — | — | 60 | #917 |
| 1951 | — | — | 63 | #885 |
| 1950 | — | — | 67 | #830 |
| 1949 | — | — | 51 | #975 |
| 1948 | — | — | 64 | #856 |
| 1947 | — | — | 57 | #925 |
| 1946 | — | — | 75 | #768 |
| 1945 | — | — | 60 | #800 |
| 1944 | — | — | 78 | #702 |
| 1943 | — | — | 64 | #824 |
| 1942 | — | — | 59 | #853 |
| 1941 | — | — | 60 | #821 |
| 1940 | — | — | 62 | #789 |
| 1939 | — | — | 49 | #895 |
| 1938 | — | — | 53 | #853 |
| 1937 | — | — | 58 | #809 |
| 1936 | — | — | 72 | #701 |
| 1935 | — | — | 64 | #773 |
| 1934 | — | — | 73 | #717 |
| 1933 | — | — | 69 | #736 |
| 1932 | — | — | 70 | #751 |
| 1931 | — | — | 68 | #752 |
| 1930 | — | — | 93 | #638 |
| 1929 | — | — | 75 | #724 |
| 1928 | — | — | 83 | #699 |
| 1927 | — | — | 90 | #680 |
| 1926 | — | — | 89 | #673 |
| 1925 | — | — | 81 | #719 |
| 1924 | — | — | 106 | #620 |
| 1923 | — | — | 105 | #621 |
| 1922 | — | — | 93 | #668 |
| 1921 | — | — | 111 | #601 |
| 1920 | — | — | 110 | #601 |
| 1919 | — | — | 112 | #565 |
| 1918 | — | — | 122 | #544 |
| 1917 | — | — | 126 | #513 |
| 1916 | — | — | 101 | #571 |
| 1915 | — | — | 89 | #612 |
| 1914 | — | — | 76 | #578 |
| 1913 | — | — | 67 | #524 |
| 1912 | — | — | 59 | #511 |
| 1911 | — | — | 44 | #441 |
| 1910 | — | — | 36 | #457 |
| 1909 | — | — | 24 | #535 |
| 1908 | — | — | 25 | #502 |
| 1907 | — | — | 21 | #520 |
| 1906 | — | — | 28 | #415 |
| 1905 | — | — | 24 | #453 |
| 1904 | — | — | 22 | #457 |
| 1903 | — | — | 26 | #384 |
| 1902 | — | — | 22 | #444 |
| 1901 | — | — | 20 | #426 |
| 1900 | — | — | 36 | #367 |
| 1899 | — | — | 41 | #273 |
| 1898 | — | — | 30 | #354 |
| 1897 | — | — | 24 | #388 |
| 1896 | — | — | 29 | #358 |
| 1895 | — | — | 39 | #283 |
| 1894 | — | — | 35 | #296 |
| 1893 | — | — | 30 | #319 |
| 1892 | — | — | 27 | #372 |
| 1891 | — | — | 43 | #243 |
| 1890 | — | — | 47 | #247 |
| 1889 | — | — | 33 | #296 |
| 1888 | — | — | 30 | #336 |
| 1887 | — | — | 23 | #343 |
| 1886 | — | — | 50 | #238 |
| 1885 | — | — | 43 | #253 |
| 1884 | — | — | 30 | #319 |
| 1883 | — | — | 44 | #241 |
| 1882 | — | — | 47 | #246 |
| 1881 | — | — | 44 | #229 |
| 1880 | — | — | 60 | #202 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).