Meaning not yet researched.
Elodie: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 980 in 2025. Its best rank was #310 in 2025.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Its highest rank in 146 years of records is this year’s. Every baby recorded as Elodie in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#310 for US girls in 2025, its highest rank in 146 years of records.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Elodie: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 980 girls in 2025. Peak: #310 in 2025 · most girls in one year: 980 (2025).
In 2025, 980 US girls were named Elodie, making it the 310th most common girls’ name of the year, up 62 places from #372 in 2024. That is 138 more than the 842 girls named Elodie in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #310, reached in this year, 2025. That year also had the most girls given the name: 980. For comparison, it was #1,168 in 2015 and #4,057 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Elodie in 116 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1881 with 5 babies. In all, 6,558 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2020s, with 3,418 babies named Elodie.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 4,470 US girls were named Elodie; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 980. In 2025 that was about 1 in 1,640 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Elodie ranked highest in Hawaii in 2025, at #98 for girls there. It was in the top 100 in 1 state (counting DC). Related spellings in the SSA files include Melodie (10,502 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Elodia, Eladio and Elidia are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Elodia (1,813), Eladio (1,813), Elidia (981), Eladia (106), Ellodie (81), Elodi (50), Elidi (49), Elydia (20), Elodee (20), Elladie (11), Elidio (10), Eladie (6).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Elodie in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 11 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | 8 | #98 | — |
| Maine | 10 | #103 | — |
| Idaho | 12 | #182 | — |
| Connecticut | 17 | #199 | — |
| Nebraska | 11 | #211 | — |
| New Hampshire | 6 | #217 | — |
| Massachusetts | 26 | #218 | #871 |
| Oklahoma | 17 | #229 | — |
| Iowa | 15 | #234 | — |
| Kansas | 13 | #239 | — |
| South Dakota | 5 | #244 | — |
| Wisconsin | 22 | #248 | #491 |
| Ohio | 41 | #269 | #1,090 |
| Minnesota | 20 | #272 | — |
| Colorado | 23 | #272 | — |
| Louisiana | 16 | #278 | — |
| Michigan | 32 | #278 | #943 |
| Washington | 26 | #278 | #719 |
| Indiana | 25 | #281 | #1,131 |
| Maryland | 18 | #286 | — |
| North Carolina | 38 | #292 | #845 |
| California | 108 | #301 | #1,182 |
| Virginia | 28 | #302 | #868 |
| Oregon | 12 | #306 | — |
| Mississippi | 9 | #313 | — |
| Missouri | 19 | #314 | #1,010 |
| Tennessee | 25 | #320 | — |
| South Carolina | 15 | #336 | — |
| Pennsylvania | 30 | #363 | #1,289 |
| Arizona | 19 | #363 | — |
| Utah | 12 | #368 | — |
| Kentucky | 12 | #371 | — |
| New Jersey | 21 | #377 | #1,228 |
| Florida | 48 | #385 | #1,527 |
| Texas | 85 | #392 | #1,491 |
| Illinois | 26 | #408 | #1,329 |
| New York | 40 | #430 | #865 |
| Georgia | 25 | #457 | — |
| Nevada | 5 | #547 | — |
| Alabama | 6 | #744 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 980 | #310 | — | — |
| 2024 | 842 | #372 | — | — |
| 2023 | 382 | #737 | — | — |
| 2022 | 429 | #681 | — | — |
| 2021 | 385 | #740 | — | — |
| 2020 | 400 | #703 | — | — |
| 2019 | 309 | #866 | — | — |
| 2018 | 244 | #1,051 | — | — |
| 2017 | 252 | #1,029 | — | — |
| 2016 | 247 | #1,055 | — | — |
| 2015 | 216 | #1,168 | — | — |
| 2014 | 209 | #1,174 | — | — |
| 2013 | 172 | #1,353 | — | — |
| 2012 | 153 | #1,480 | — | — |
| 2011 | 108 | #1,861 | — | — |
| 2010 | 75 | #2,480 | — | — |
| 2009 | 65 | #2,762 | — | — |
| 2008 | 86 | #2,278 | — | — |
| 2007 | 47 | #3,497 | — | — |
| 2006 | 38 | #3,947 | — | — |
| 2005 | 35 | #4,054 | — | — |
| 2004 | 35 | #4,026 | — | — |
| 2003 | 21 | #5,651 | — | — |
| 2002 | 25 | #4,806 | — | — |
| 2001 | 25 | #4,734 | — | — |
| 2000 | 13 | #7,714 | — | — |
| 1999 | 13 | #7,363 | — | — |
| 1998 | 14 | #6,826 | — | — |
| 1997 | 10 | #8,543 | — | — |
| 1996 | 5 | #14,174 | — | — |
| 1995 | 6 | #12,239 | — | — |
| 1994 | 9 | #9,049 | — | — |
| 1993 | 12 | #7,160 | — | — |
| 1992 | 7 | #10,832 | — | — |
| 1991 | 7 | #10,617 | — | — |
| 1990 | 8 | #9,529 | — | — |
| 1989 | 5 | #12,976 | — | — |
| 1988 | 9 | #7,894 | — | — |
| 1987 | 5 | #11,853 | — | — |
| 1980 | 7 | #8,400 | — | — |
| 1973 | 5 | #8,805 | — | — |
| 1971 | 5 | #8,703 | — | — |
| 1969 | 5 | #7,799 | — | — |
| 1966 | 5 | #6,865 | — | — |
| 1963 | 6 | #6,068 | — | — |
| 1960 | 6 | #5,894 | — | — |
| 1959 | 5 | #6,529 | — | — |
| 1958 | 5 | #6,363 | — | — |
| 1957 | 7 | #5,045 | — | — |
| 1956 | 5 | #6,225 | — | — |
| 1955 | 10 | #3,863 | — | — |
| 1954 | 5 | #5,985 | — | — |
| 1953 | 5 | #5,920 | — | — |
| 1952 | 12 | #3,249 | — | — |
| 1951 | 6 | #5,009 | — | — |
| 1950 | 8 | #4,057 | — | — |
| 1949 | 7 | #4,358 | — | — |
| 1948 | 6 | #4,829 | — | — |
| 1947 | 15 | #2,669 | — | — |
| 1946 | 6 | #4,590 | — | — |
| 1945 | 5 | #4,752 | — | — |
| 1944 | 7 | #3,806 | — | — |
| 1943 | 6 | #4,331 | — | — |
| 1942 | 8 | #3,525 | — | — |
| 1941 | 7 | #3,669 | — | — |
| 1939 | 14 | #2,230 | — | — |
| 1938 | 6 | #3,976 | — | — |
| 1937 | 8 | #3,236 | — | — |
| 1936 | 8 | #3,187 | — | — |
| 1935 | 7 | #3,506 | — | — |
| 1934 | 14 | #2,220 | — | — |
| 1933 | 6 | #3,875 | — | — |
| 1932 | 9 | #3,118 | — | — |
| 1931 | 11 | #2,628 | — | — |
| 1930 | 11 | #2,741 | — | — |
| 1929 | 11 | #2,787 | — | — |
| 1928 | 9 | #3,258 | — | — |
| 1927 | 9 | #3,370 | — | — |
| 1926 | 12 | #2,757 | — | — |
| 1925 | 13 | #2,658 | — | — |
| 1924 | 10 | #3,207 | — | — |
| 1923 | 17 | #2,199 | — | — |
| 1922 | 15 | #2,417 | — | — |
| 1921 | 9 | #3,490 | — | — |
| 1920 | 10 | #3,171 | — | — |
| 1919 | 15 | #2,294 | — | — |
| 1918 | 11 | #2,872 | — | — |
| 1917 | 19 | #1,864 | — | — |
| 1916 | 13 | #2,409 | — | — |
| 1915 | 8 | #3,213 | — | — |
| 1914 | 15 | #1,759 | — | — |
| 1913 | 11 | #1,930 | — | — |
| 1912 | 8 | #2,209 | — | — |
| 1911 | 18 | #1,041 | — | — |
| 1910 | 6 | #2,219 | — | — |
| 1909 | 8 | #1,646 | — | — |
| 1908 | 8 | #1,581 | — | — |
| 1906 | 12 | #1,115 | — | — |
| 1905 | 5 | #2,026 | — | — |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,719 | — | — |
| 1902 | 5 | #1,870 | — | — |
| 1899 | 6 | #1,463 | — | — |
| 1898 | 5 | #1,782 | — | — |
| 1897 | 7 | #1,297 | — | — |
| 1896 | 7 | #1,332 | — | — |
| 1895 | 10 | #1,076 | — | — |
| 1894 | 7 | #1,270 | — | — |
| 1893 | 7 | #1,211 | — | — |
| 1892 | 8 | #1,109 | — | — |
| 1891 | 7 | #1,131 | — | — |
| 1890 | 8 | #1,027 | — | — |
| 1886 | 9 | #790 | — | — |
| 1885 | 5 | #1,087 | — | — |
| 1884 | 5 | #1,072 | — | — |
| 1883 | 8 | #716 | — | — |
| 1881 | 5 | #860 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).