Meaning not yet researched.
Edyth: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 5 in 2025. Its best rank was #586 in 1894.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #586 in 1894; #15,549 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Edyth in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#15,549 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1894, at #586.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Edyth: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 5 girls in 2025. Peak: #586 in 1894 · most girls in one year: 76 (1920).
In 2025, 5 US girls were named Edyth, making it the 15,549th most common girls’ name of the year. Its best rank for girls was #586, reached in 1894. The most girls given the name in a single year was 76, in 1920. For comparison, it was #13,396 in 2015 and #3,109 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Edyth in 111 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1880 with 6 babies. In all, 2,283 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 1920s, with 540 babies named Edyth.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 59 US girls were named Edyth; the busiest of those years was 2018, with 11. In 2025 that was about 1 in 321,453 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Edith (271,705 babies since 1880) and Edythe (13,880 babies since 1880). The open nickname list we use links it to Edie and Edye.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5 | #15,549 | — | — |
| 2022 | 7 | #12,604 | — | — |
| 2021 | 9 | #10,511 | — | — |
| 2020 | 10 | #9,753 | — | — |
| 2019 | 10 | #9,942 | — | — |
| 2018 | 11 | #9,345 | — | — |
| 2016 | 7 | #13,303 | — | — |
| 2015 | 7 | #13,396 | — | — |
| 2014 | 9 | #11,249 | — | — |
| 2012 | 5 | #17,621 | — | — |
| 2011 | 5 | #17,541 | — | — |
| 2010 | 6 | #15,517 | — | — |
| 2009 | 5 | #18,096 | — | — |
| 2007 | 5 | #18,440 | — | — |
| 2005 | 5 | #17,251 | — | — |
| 2002 | 5 | #16,187 | — | — |
| 2001 | 7 | #12,436 | — | — |
| 1998 | 5 | #14,841 | — | — |
| 1995 | 6 | #12,218 | — | — |
| 1993 | 5 | #14,133 | — | — |
| 1992 | 7 | #10,822 | — | — |
| 1990 | 5 | #13,589 | — | — |
| 1973 | 5 | #8,800 | — | — |
| 1968 | 8 | #5,270 | — | — |
| 1967 | 6 | #6,235 | — | — |
| 1966 | 6 | #6,001 | — | — |
| 1965 | 8 | #4,954 | — | — |
| 1964 | 8 | #5,138 | — | — |
| 1963 | 15 | #3,377 | — | — |
| 1962 | 10 | #4,345 | — | — |
| 1961 | 6 | #6,029 | — | — |
| 1960 | 12 | #3,757 | — | — |
| 1959 | 15 | #3,149 | — | — |
| 1958 | 19 | #2,690 | — | — |
| 1956 | 15 | #3,089 | — | — |
| 1955 | 13 | #3,260 | — | — |
| 1954 | 18 | #2,615 | — | — |
| 1953 | 12 | #3,323 | — | — |
| 1952 | 7 | #4,606 | — | — |
| 1951 | 16 | #2,619 | — | — |
| 1950 | 12 | #3,109 | — | — |
| 1949 | 14 | #2,769 | — | — |
| 1948 | 14 | #2,737 | — | — |
| 1947 | 19 | #2,301 | — | — |
| 1946 | 14 | #2,645 | — | — |
| 1945 | 13 | #2,499 | — | — |
| 1944 | 21 | #1,877 | — | — |
| 1943 | 19 | #2,012 | — | — |
| 1942 | 31 | #1,481 | — | — |
| 1941 | 24 | #1,621 | — | — |
| 1940 | 14 | #2,225 | — | — |
| 1939 | 15 | #2,147 | — | — |
| 1938 | 23 | #1,606 | — | — |
| 1937 | 25 | #1,506 | — | — |
| 1936 | 12 | #2,419 | — | — |
| 1935 | 31 | #1,311 | — | — |
| 1934 | 22 | #1,617 | — | — |
| 1933 | 20 | #1,737 | — | — |
| 1932 | 35 | #1,218 | — | — |
| 1931 | 37 | #1,181 | — | — |
| 1930 | 36 | #1,257 | — | — |
| 1929 | 28 | #1,457 | — | — |
| 1928 | 26 | #1,603 | — | — |
| 1927 | 47 | #1,110 | — | — |
| 1926 | 49 | #1,073 | — | — |
| 1925 | 56 | #999 | — | — |
| 1924 | 60 | #985 | — | — |
| 1923 | 56 | #1,006 | — | — |
| 1922 | 74 | #856 | — | — |
| 1921 | 68 | #894 | — | — |
| 1920 | 76 | #826 | — | — |
| 1919 | 60 | #911 | — | — |
| 1918 | 76 | #822 | — | — |
| 1917 | 66 | #844 | — | — |
| 1916 | 55 | #917 | — | — |
| 1915 | 59 | #850 | — | — |
| 1914 | 44 | #880 | — | — |
| 1913 | 30 | #985 | — | — |
| 1912 | 25 | #1,039 | — | — |
| 1911 | 20 | #990 | — | — |
| 1910 | 16 | #1,131 | — | — |
| 1909 | 22 | #873 | — | — |
| 1908 | 20 | #889 | — | — |
| 1907 | 19 | #879 | — | — |
| 1906 | 27 | #709 | — | — |
| 1905 | 24 | #741 | — | — |
| 1904 | 19 | #840 | — | — |
| 1903 | 20 | #769 | — | — |
| 1902 | 24 | #692 | — | — |
| 1901 | 18 | #777 | — | — |
| 1900 | 17 | #927 | — | — |
| 1899 | 22 | #667 | — | — |
| 1898 | 15 | #893 | — | — |
| 1897 | 19 | #721 | — | — |
| 1896 | 19 | #733 | — | — |
| 1895 | 18 | #751 | — | — |
| 1894 | 25 | #586 | — | — |
| 1893 | 14 | #804 | — | — |
| 1892 | 19 | #669 | — | — |
| 1891 | 9 | #957 | — | — |
| 1890 | 16 | #671 | — | — |
| 1889 | 14 | #695 | — | — |
| 1888 | 15 | #668 | — | — |
| 1887 | 14 | #615 | — | — |
| 1886 | 11 | #704 | — | — |
| 1885 | 13 | #615 | — | — |
| 1884 | 11 | #650 | — | — |
| 1883 | 9 | #661 | — | — |
| 1882 | 10 | #608 | — | — |
| 1881 | 7 | #700 | — | — |
| 1880 | 6 | #772 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).