Meaning not yet researched.
Dennie: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 0 in 2025. Its best rank was #579 in 1886.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Fewer than five US boys were given it in 2025. It peaked at #579 in 1886. No US babies were recorded with the name Dennie in 2025.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
Given to fewer than five US boys in 2025; it peaked at #579 in 1886.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Dennie: US boys and girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 0 boys in 2025. Peak: #579 in 1886 · most boys in one year: 96 (1946).
Fewer than five US boys were named Dennie in 2025, so it does not appear in that year’s SSA list for boys. Its best rank for boys was #579, reached in 1886. The most boys given the name in a single year was 96, in 1946. For comparison, it was unranked (under five boys) in 2015 and #828 in 1950.
Fewer than five US girls were named Dennie in 2025, so it does not appear in that year’s SSA list for girls. Its best rank for girls was #950, reached in 1884. The most girls given the name in a single year was 22, in 1952. For comparison, it was unranked (under five girls) in 2015 and #2,365 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Dennie in 116 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1881 with 5 babies. In all, 4,537 US babies have been given the name, 18% of them girls and 82% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1950s, with 892 babies named Dennie.
In none of the 10 years from 2016 to 2025 were five or more US boys named Dennie.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Denny (15,819 babies since 1880) and Dannie (11,446 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Deanie, Diannie and Deannie are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in English. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Deanie (749), Diannie (91), Deannie (90), Deania (79), Dinnie (32), Dionnie (18), Deenie (17), Deannia (17), Dianie (11), Denyia (11), Deonnie (10), Dinnia (10), and more.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Dennie in the open dataset we use.
Dennie is listed as a nickname for Dennis.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | — | — | 7 | #9,968 |
| 2007 | — | — | 5 | #12,819 |
| 2004 | — | — | 6 | #10,290 |
| 2000 | — | — | 6 | #9,387 |
| 1999 | — | — | 5 | #10,298 |
| 1998 | — | — | 7 | #7,773 |
| 1996 | — | — | 10 | #5,637 |
| 1995 | — | — | 9 | #6,038 |
| 1994 | — | — | 9 | #5,977 |
| 1993 | — | — | 11 | #5,087 |
| 1992 | — | — | 8 | #6,264 |
| 1991 | — | — | 15 | #3,858 |
| 1990 | — | — | 17 | #3,497 |
| 1989 | — | — | 7 | #6,386 |
| 1988 | — | — | 23 | #2,534 |
| 1987 | — | — | 20 | #2,655 |
| 1986 | — | — | 16 | #3,032 |
| 1985 | 5 | #11,081 | 26 | #2,135 |
| 1984 | 5 | #10,821 | 18 | #2,635 |
| 1983 | — | — | 22 | #2,292 |
| 1982 | — | — | 17 | #2,735 |
| 1981 | — | — | 18 | #2,600 |
| 1980 | 6 | #9,372 | 25 | #2,127 |
| 1979 | 9 | #6,839 | 25 | #2,060 |
| 1978 | — | — | 28 | #1,840 |
| 1977 | 10 | #5,983 | 27 | #1,871 |
| 1976 | 5 | #9,656 | 28 | #1,794 |
| 1975 | 16 | #3,990 | 33 | #1,564 |
| 1974 | 10 | #5,443 | 28 | #1,709 |
| 1973 | 7 | #6,836 | 37 | #1,379 |
| 1972 | 14 | #4,133 | 39 | #1,349 |
| 1971 | 15 | #3,988 | 39 | #1,356 |
| 1970 | 7 | #6,510 | 46 | #1,227 |
| 1969 | 7 | #6,107 | 68 | #926 |
| 1968 | 10 | #4,566 | 51 | #1,037 |
| 1967 | 7 | #5,606 | 57 | #957 |
| 1966 | 12 | #3,783 | 47 | #1,077 |
| 1965 | 7 | #5,412 | 58 | #969 |
| 1964 | 9 | #4,704 | 58 | #992 |
| 1963 | 5 | #6,829 | 59 | #989 |
| 1962 | 13 | #3,633 | 52 | #1,059 |
| 1961 | 14 | #3,489 | 64 | #959 |
| 1960 | 11 | #3,966 | 61 | #974 |
| 1959 | 11 | #3,877 | 84 | #831 |
| 1958 | 9 | #4,256 | 87 | #804 |
| 1957 | 18 | #2,745 | 61 | #974 |
| 1956 | 14 | #3,209 | 73 | #876 |
| 1955 | 15 | #3,006 | 87 | #780 |
| 1954 | 11 | #3,542 | 72 | #864 |
| 1953 | 11 | #3,528 | 62 | #911 |
| 1952 | 22 | #2,219 | 69 | #842 |
| 1951 | 20 | #2,261 | 80 | #788 |
| 1950 | 18 | #2,365 | 68 | #828 |
| 1949 | 12 | #3,044 | 68 | #825 |
| 1948 | 6 | #4,800 | 65 | #846 |
| 1947 | 12 | #3,096 | 84 | #748 |
| 1946 | 18 | #2,247 | 96 | #660 |
| 1945 | 16 | #2,171 | 76 | #700 |
| 1944 | 11 | #2,807 | 69 | #748 |
| 1943 | 9 | #3,301 | 77 | #737 |
| 1942 | 11 | #2,859 | 69 | #778 |
| 1941 | 16 | #2,118 | 53 | #871 |
| 1940 | 11 | #2,606 | 54 | #860 |
| 1939 | 12 | #2,448 | 63 | #764 |
| 1938 | 10 | #2,775 | 62 | #779 |
| 1937 | 8 | #3,211 | 45 | #933 |
| 1936 | 13 | #2,298 | 39 | #1,016 |
| 1935 | — | — | 65 | #768 |
| 1934 | 11 | #2,604 | 43 | #975 |
| 1933 | 7 | #3,494 | 32 | #1,166 |
| 1932 | 10 | #2,864 | 41 | #1,039 |
| 1931 | 11 | #2,614 | 39 | #1,079 |
| 1930 | 13 | #2,452 | 31 | #1,286 |
| 1929 | 10 | #2,972 | 28 | #1,345 |
| 1928 | 6 | #4,302 | 26 | #1,459 |
| 1927 | 10 | #3,109 | 39 | #1,148 |
| 1926 | 11 | #2,919 | 34 | #1,248 |
| 1925 | 9 | #3,434 | 33 | #1,257 |
| 1924 | 7 | #4,100 | 26 | #1,498 |
| 1923 | 11 | #2,966 | 31 | #1,307 |
| 1922 | 12 | #2,825 | 28 | #1,408 |
| 1921 | 9 | #3,473 | 34 | #1,255 |
| 1920 | 8 | #3,696 | 28 | #1,392 |
| 1919 | 6 | #4,385 | 22 | #1,586 |
| 1918 | 10 | #3,083 | 35 | #1,180 |
| 1917 | 12 | #2,595 | 21 | #1,604 |
| 1916 | 12 | #2,529 | 28 | #1,272 |
| 1915 | 6 | #3,889 | 23 | #1,424 |
| 1914 | 14 | #1,831 | 21 | #1,306 |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,383 | 11 | #1,707 |
| 1912 | — | — | 16 | #1,190 |
| 1911 | 10 | #1,566 | — | — |
| 1908 | 9 | #1,461 | 5 | #1,432 |
| 1907 | 6 | #1,883 | 7 | #1,124 |
| 1906 | 6 | #1,789 | — | — |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,705 | — | — |
| 1903 | — | — | 7 | #930 |
| 1901 | — | — | 7 | #876 |
| 1900 | 5 | #2,004 | — | — |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,661 | 5 | #1,087 |
| 1897 | 5 | #1,611 | 6 | #968 |
| 1896 | — | — | 6 | #1,011 |
| 1895 | 9 | #1,144 | — | — |
| 1894 | — | — | 5 | #1,124 |
| 1892 | 5 | #1,504 | 5 | #1,105 |
| 1891 | — | — | 7 | #788 |
| 1890 | — | — | 8 | #765 |
| 1889 | — | — | 5 | #1,005 |
| 1888 | 5 | #1,334 | 7 | #837 |
| 1887 | — | — | 5 | #963 |
| 1886 | — | — | 11 | #579 |
| 1885 | — | — | 6 | #859 |
| 1884 | 6 | #950 | — | — |
| 1883 | — | — | 6 | #820 |
| 1882 | — | — | 6 | #864 |
| 1881 | — | — | 5 | #900 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).