Meaning not yet researched.
Delma: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 0 in 2025. Its best rank was #448 in 1907.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Fewer than five US girls were given it in 2025. It peaked at #448 in 1907. No US babies were recorded with the name Delma in 2025.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
Given to fewer than five US girls in 2025; it peaked at #448 in 1907.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Delma: US girls and boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 0 girls in 2025. Peak: #448 in 1907 · most girls in one year: 205 (1926).
Fewer than five US girls were named Delma in 2025, so it does not appear in that year’s SSA list for girls. Its best rank for girls was #448, reached in 1907. The most girls given the name in a single year was 205, in 1926. For comparison, it was #13,362 in 2015 and #918 in 1950.
Fewer than five US boys were named Delma in 2025, so it does not appear in that year’s SSA list for boys. Its best rank for boys was #983, reached in 1935. The most boys given the name in a single year was 45, in 1926. For comparison, it was unranked (under five boys) in 2015 and #1,546 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Delma in 122 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1884 with 8 babies. In all, 9,901 US babies have been given the name, 85% of them girls and 15% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1920s, with 2,123 babies named Delma.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 12 US girls were named Delma; the busiest of those years was 2019, with 7.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Elma (22,186 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Dilma are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Irish. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Dilma (26).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Delma in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | #15,785 | — | — |
| 2019 | 7 | #12,780 | — | — |
| 2015 | 7 | #13,362 | — | — |
| 2012 | 5 | #17,563 | — | — |
| 2008 | 5 | #18,248 | — | — |
| 2007 | 7 | #14,301 | — | — |
| 2005 | 6 | #14,966 | — | — |
| 2002 | 7 | #12,550 | — | — |
| 2001 | 9 | #10,329 | — | — |
| 1999 | 9 | #9,697 | — | — |
| 1998 | 5 | #14,748 | — | — |
| 1997 | 8 | #10,036 | — | — |
| 1995 | 7 | #10,804 | — | — |
| 1994 | 11 | #7,745 | — | — |
| 1993 | 9 | #8,914 | — | — |
| 1992 | 5 | #13,837 | — | — |
| 1991 | 11 | #7,537 | — | — |
| 1990 | 14 | #6,212 | — | — |
| 1989 | 14 | #5,905 | — | — |
| 1988 | 10 | #7,261 | — | — |
| 1987 | 12 | #6,020 | — | — |
| 1986 | 7 | #8,770 | — | — |
| 1985 | 15 | #4,908 | — | — |
| 1984 | 11 | #5,997 | — | — |
| 1983 | 22 | #3,589 | — | — |
| 1982 | 26 | #3,276 | 6 | #5,816 |
| 1981 | 18 | #4,190 | 7 | #5,061 |
| 1980 | 22 | #3,638 | — | — |
| 1979 | 20 | #3,805 | 8 | #4,500 |
| 1978 | 33 | #2,581 | — | — |
| 1977 | 27 | #2,925 | 5 | #6,059 |
| 1976 | 31 | #2,559 | — | — |
| 1975 | 34 | #2,369 | — | — |
| 1974 | 30 | #2,512 | — | — |
| 1973 | 32 | #2,364 | — | — |
| 1972 | 41 | #1,978 | — | — |
| 1971 | 50 | #1,777 | 6 | #4,523 |
| 1970 | 57 | #1,638 | — | — |
| 1969 | 56 | #1,595 | 7 | #3,672 |
| 1968 | 57 | #1,505 | 8 | #3,169 |
| 1967 | 64 | #1,375 | 11 | #2,507 |
| 1966 | 68 | #1,316 | 5 | #4,074 |
| 1965 | 86 | #1,149 | 8 | #3,041 |
| 1964 | 80 | #1,231 | 6 | #3,702 |
| 1963 | 86 | #1,182 | 8 | #3,111 |
| 1962 | 89 | #1,160 | 7 | #3,381 |
| 1961 | 93 | #1,137 | 9 | #2,943 |
| 1960 | 92 | #1,131 | 11 | #2,573 |
| 1959 | 97 | #1,081 | 18 | #1,926 |
| 1958 | 122 | #933 | 16 | #2,043 |
| 1957 | 110 | #991 | 12 | #2,402 |
| 1956 | 109 | #966 | 15 | #2,110 |
| 1955 | 126 | #866 | 17 | #1,919 |
| 1954 | 110 | #917 | 22 | #1,640 |
| 1953 | 110 | #897 | 14 | #2,117 |
| 1952 | 88 | #1,004 | 14 | #2,093 |
| 1951 | 91 | #978 | 16 | #1,921 |
| 1950 | 94 | #918 | 23 | #1,546 |
| 1949 | 97 | #897 | 16 | #1,882 |
| 1948 | 101 | #868 | 21 | #1,620 |
| 1947 | 105 | #855 | 24 | #1,526 |
| 1946 | 100 | #830 | 19 | #1,652 |
| 1945 | 90 | #793 | 22 | #1,419 |
| 1944 | 90 | #807 | 21 | #1,492 |
| 1943 | 108 | #747 | 29 | #1,286 |
| 1942 | 103 | #745 | 30 | #1,277 |
| 1941 | 107 | #678 | 33 | #1,159 |
| 1940 | 126 | #626 | 20 | #1,531 |
| 1939 | 125 | #602 | 24 | #1,366 |
| 1938 | 126 | #609 | 36 | #1,078 |
| 1937 | 146 | #558 | 38 | #1,037 |
| 1936 | 152 | #525 | 29 | #1,230 |
| 1935 | 146 | #533 | 42 | #983 |
| 1934 | 154 | #520 | 36 | #1,103 |
| 1933 | 167 | #492 | 33 | #1,147 |
| 1932 | 156 | #524 | 28 | #1,296 |
| 1931 | 144 | #549 | 35 | #1,153 |
| 1930 | 141 | #574 | 27 | #1,406 |
| 1929 | 162 | #532 | 36 | #1,156 |
| 1928 | 172 | #531 | 42 | #1,080 |
| 1927 | 177 | #534 | 33 | #1,278 |
| 1926 | 205 | #486 | 45 | #1,038 |
| 1925 | 183 | #526 | 24 | #1,542 |
| 1924 | 188 | #522 | 39 | #1,158 |
| 1923 | 189 | #505 | 41 | #1,118 |
| 1922 | 174 | #536 | 45 | #1,048 |
| 1921 | 150 | #591 | 41 | #1,106 |
| 1920 | 145 | #596 | 32 | #1,279 |
| 1919 | 158 | #549 | 34 | #1,211 |
| 1918 | 160 | #561 | 38 | #1,113 |
| 1917 | 147 | #557 | 21 | #1,603 |
| 1916 | 129 | #590 | 23 | #1,467 |
| 1915 | 152 | #503 | 26 | #1,313 |
| 1914 | 132 | #479 | 23 | #1,233 |
| 1913 | 116 | #464 | 12 | #1,603 |
| 1912 | 72 | #567 | 11 | #1,549 |
| 1911 | 68 | #502 | 5 | #1,801 |
| 1910 | 61 | #523 | 7 | #1,340 |
| 1909 | 52 | #524 | 8 | #1,101 |
| 1908 | 54 | #493 | — | — |
| 1907 | 64 | #448 | 8 | #1,019 |
| 1906 | 52 | #473 | 5 | #1,285 |
| 1905 | 39 | #558 | 6 | #1,128 |
| 1904 | 23 | #729 | — | — |
| 1903 | 28 | #633 | — | — |
| 1902 | 26 | #654 | — | — |
| 1901 | 23 | #666 | — | — |
| 1900 | 27 | #693 | — | — |
| 1899 | 19 | #733 | — | — |
| 1898 | 22 | #701 | — | — |
| 1897 | 16 | #798 | — | — |
| 1896 | 18 | #765 | — | — |
| 1895 | 16 | #794 | — | — |
| 1894 | 16 | #756 | — | — |
| 1893 | 10 | #970 | — | — |
| 1892 | 6 | #1,318 | — | — |
| 1891 | 6 | #1,237 | — | — |
| 1889 | 11 | #808 | — | — |
| 1887 | 7 | #968 | — | — |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,143 | — | — |
| 1885 | 5 | #1,082 | — | — |
| 1884 | 8 | #806 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).