Meaning not yet researched.
Angeline: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 134 in 2025. Its best rank was #183 in 1915.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #183 in 1915; #1,570 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Angeline in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#1,570 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1915, at #183.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Angeline: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 134 girls in 2025. Peak: #183 in 1915 · most girls in one year: 986 (1921).
In 2025, 134 US girls were named Angeline, making it the 1,570th most common girls’ name of the year, down 418 places from #1,152 in 2024. That is 75 fewer than the 209 girls named Angeline in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #183, reached in 1915. The most girls given the name in a single year was 986, in 1921. For comparison, it was #952 in 2015 and #682 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Angeline in every one of the 146 years from 1880 to 2025; in 1880 there were 25 babies with the name. In all, 36,884 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 1920s, with 8,113 babies named Angeline.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 1,862 US girls were named Angeline; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 241. In 2025 that was about 1 in 11,995 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Angeline ranked highest in Maryland in 2025, at #661 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Angelina (126,392 babies since 1880) and Angelyn (2,737 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Angelene, Angelynn and Angelin are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Dutch. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Angelene (1,920), Angelynn (674), Angelin (632), Angelyne (239), Angelinne (57), Angelynne (26), Angelann (11), Angelline (9), Angelian (6).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Angeline in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 44 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | 7 | #661 | — |
| Florida | 18 | #869 | #392 |
| New Jersey | 6 | #1,050 | #585 |
| Texas | 25 | #1,093 | #932 |
| North Carolina | 7 | #1,149 | #1,405 |
| California | 20 | #1,238 | #646 |
| New York | 9 | #1,424 | #859 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 134 | #1,570 | — | — |
| 2024 | 209 | #1,152 | — | — |
| 2023 | 160 | #1,402 | — | — |
| 2022 | 195 | #1,232 | — | — |
| 2021 | 156 | #1,398 | — | — |
| 2020 | 161 | #1,357 | — | — |
| 2019 | 170 | #1,341 | — | — |
| 2018 | 219 | #1,116 | — | — |
| 2017 | 217 | #1,141 | — | — |
| 2016 | 241 | #1,078 | — | — |
| 2015 | 285 | #952 | — | — |
| 2014 | 323 | #852 | — | — |
| 2013 | 301 | #857 | — | — |
| 2012 | 365 | #759 | — | — |
| 2011 | 362 | #760 | — | — |
| 2010 | 313 | #858 | — | — |
| 2009 | 332 | #841 | — | — |
| 2008 | 373 | #787 | — | — |
| 2007 | 500 | #602 | — | — |
| 2006 | 311 | #858 | — | — |
| 2005 | 269 | #925 | — | — |
| 2004 | 231 | #1,019 | — | — |
| 2003 | 231 | #1,000 | — | — |
| 2002 | 220 | #1,001 | — | — |
| 2001 | 200 | #1,063 | — | — |
| 2000 | 179 | #1,139 | — | — |
| 1999 | 166 | #1,169 | — | — |
| 1998 | 147 | #1,236 | — | — |
| 1997 | 147 | #1,219 | — | — |
| 1996 | 128 | #1,328 | — | — |
| 1995 | 120 | #1,370 | — | — |
| 1994 | 140 | #1,237 | — | — |
| 1993 | 176 | #1,044 | — | — |
| 1992 | 165 | #1,091 | — | — |
| 1991 | 164 | #1,097 | — | — |
| 1990 | 163 | #1,081 | — | — |
| 1989 | 159 | #1,063 | — | — |
| 1988 | 148 | #1,066 | — | — |
| 1987 | 157 | #998 | — | — |
| 1986 | 144 | #1,048 | — | — |
| 1985 | 134 | #1,081 | — | — |
| 1984 | 143 | #1,004 | — | — |
| 1983 | 132 | #1,050 | — | — |
| 1982 | 170 | #894 | — | — |
| 1981 | 174 | #877 | — | — |
| 1980 | 179 | #860 | — | — |
| 1979 | 159 | #923 | — | — |
| 1978 | 155 | #914 | — | — |
| 1977 | 140 | #980 | — | — |
| 1976 | 140 | #925 | — | — |
| 1975 | 174 | #795 | — | — |
| 1974 | 178 | #775 | — | — |
| 1973 | 169 | #785 | — | — |
| 1972 | 158 | #832 | — | — |
| 1971 | 188 | #772 | — | — |
| 1970 | 193 | #758 | — | — |
| 1969 | 144 | #872 | — | — |
| 1968 | 143 | #855 | — | — |
| 1967 | 141 | #850 | — | — |
| 1966 | 110 | #972 | — | — |
| 1965 | 111 | #982 | — | — |
| 1964 | 138 | #885 | — | — |
| 1963 | 102 | #1,065 | — | — |
| 1962 | 115 | #1,001 | — | — |
| 1961 | 101 | #1,090 | — | — |
| 1960 | 103 | #1,058 | — | — |
| 1959 | 96 | #1,088 | — | — |
| 1958 | 109 | #995 | — | — |
| 1957 | 100 | #1,045 | — | — |
| 1956 | 113 | #948 | — | — |
| 1955 | 137 | #826 | — | — |
| 1954 | 145 | #777 | — | — |
| 1953 | 144 | #762 | — | — |
| 1952 | 115 | #857 | — | — |
| 1951 | 173 | #664 | — | — |
| 1950 | 157 | #682 | — | — |
| 1949 | 159 | #663 | — | — |
| 1948 | 165 | #649 | — | — |
| 1947 | 174 | #633 | — | — |
| 1946 | 147 | #651 | — | — |
| 1945 | 135 | #624 | — | — |
| 1944 | 175 | #547 | — | — |
| 1943 | 178 | #567 | — | — |
| 1942 | 189 | #538 | — | — |
| 1941 | 207 | #488 | — | — |
| 1940 | 214 | #457 | — | — |
| 1939 | 266 | #414 | — | — |
| 1938 | 234 | #439 | — | — |
| 1937 | 286 | #382 | — | — |
| 1936 | 286 | #375 | — | — |
| 1935 | 320 | #356 | — | — |
| 1934 | 356 | #333 | — | — |
| 1933 | 390 | #315 | — | — |
| 1932 | 470 | #286 | — | — |
| 1931 | 465 | #288 | — | — |
| 1930 | 547 | #274 | — | — |
| 1929 | 612 | #258 | — | — |
| 1928 | 674 | #240 | — | — |
| 1927 | 689 | #249 | — | — |
| 1926 | 745 | #237 | — | — |
| 1925 | 821 | #227 | 5 | #4,218 |
| 1924 | 822 | #231 | — | — |
| 1923 | 906 | #213 | — | — |
| 1922 | 935 | #206 | — | — |
| 1921 | 986 | #203 | — | — |
| 1920 | 918 | #209 | — | — |
| 1919 | 894 | #209 | — | — |
| 1918 | 949 | #202 | 5 | #4,203 |
| 1917 | 941 | #196 | — | — |
| 1916 | 940 | #189 | — | — |
| 1915 | 922 | #183 | — | — |
| 1914 | 632 | #206 | — | — |
| 1913 | 478 | #217 | — | — |
| 1912 | 386 | #231 | — | — |
| 1911 | 321 | #221 | — | — |
| 1910 | 276 | #232 | — | — |
| 1909 | 232 | #235 | — | — |
| 1908 | 188 | #253 | — | — |
| 1907 | 190 | #250 | — | — |
| 1906 | 170 | #249 | — | — |
| 1905 | 154 | #262 | — | — |
| 1904 | 151 | #256 | — | — |
| 1903 | 152 | #242 | — | — |
| 1902 | 129 | #274 | — | — |
| 1901 | 110 | #282 | — | — |
| 1900 | 133 | #281 | — | — |
| 1899 | 105 | #284 | — | — |
| 1898 | 111 | #291 | — | — |
| 1897 | 89 | #308 | — | — |
| 1896 | 88 | #310 | — | — |
| 1895 | 82 | #319 | — | — |
| 1894 | 68 | #338 | — | — |
| 1893 | 69 | #323 | — | — |
| 1892 | 80 | #304 | — | — |
| 1891 | 65 | #313 | — | — |
| 1890 | 70 | #296 | — | — |
| 1889 | 57 | #324 | — | — |
| 1888 | 57 | #317 | — | — |
| 1887 | 52 | #295 | — | — |
| 1886 | 27 | #417 | — | — |
| 1885 | 27 | #394 | — | — |
| 1884 | 35 | #331 | — | — |
| 1883 | 34 | #300 | — | — |
| 1882 | 29 | #327 | — | — |
| 1881 | 21 | #361 | — | — |
| 1880 | 25 | #317 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).