Meaning not yet researched.
Whitleigh: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 29 in 2025. Its best rank was #4,750 in 2025.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Its highest rank in 146 years of records is this year’s. Every baby recorded as Whitleigh in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#4,750 for US girls in 2025, its highest rank in 146 years of records.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Whitleigh: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 29 girls in 2025. Peak: #4,750 in 2025 · most girls in one year: 29 (2025).
In 2025, 29 US girls were named Whitleigh, making it the 4,750th most common girls’ name of the year, up 684 places from #5,434 in 2024. That is 5 more than the 24 girls named Whitleigh in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #4,750, reached in this year, 2025. That year also had the most girls given the name: 29. For comparison, it was #7,986 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.
Social Security card records list Whitleigh in 19 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1988 with 6 babies. In all, 249 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 119 babies named Whitleigh.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 175 US girls were named Whitleigh; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 29. In 2025 that was about 1 in 55,423 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).