Meaning not yet researched.
Tito: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 25 in 2025. Its best rank was #811 in 1974.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #811 in 1974; #4,239 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Tito in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#4,239 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1974, at #811.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Tito: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 25 boys in 2025. Peak: #811 in 1974 · most boys in one year: 99 (1974).
In 2025, 25 US boys were named Tito, making it the 4,239th most common boys’ name of the year, up 627 places from #4,866 in 2024. That is 4 more than the 21 boys named Tito in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #811, reached in 1974. That year also had the most boys given the name: 99. For comparison, it was #4,165 in 2015 and #1,741 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Tito in 114 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1909 with 5 babies. In all, 3,376 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 1970s, with 664 babies named Tito.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 217 US boys were named Tito; the busiest of those years was 2017, with 30. In 2025 that was about 1 in 68,323 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Titus (26,823 babies since 1880) and Tytus (1,543 babies since 1880).
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0).
No nicknames listed for Tito in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 25 | #4,239 |
| 2024 | — | — | 21 | #4,866 |
| 2023 | — | — | 19 | #5,231 |
| 2022 | — | — | 19 | #5,193 |
| 2021 | — | — | 25 | #4,224 |
| 2020 | — | — | 18 | #5,205 |
| 2019 | — | — | 24 | #4,322 |
| 2018 | — | — | 17 | #5,521 |
| 2017 | — | — | 30 | #3,664 |
| 2016 | — | — | 19 | #5,108 |
| 2015 | — | — | 25 | #4,165 |
| 2014 | — | — | 27 | #3,880 |
| 2013 | — | — | 28 | #3,741 |
| 2012 | — | — | 24 | #4,234 |
| 2011 | — | — | 36 | #3,159 |
| 2010 | — | — | 32 | #3,441 |
| 2009 | — | — | 45 | #2,748 |
| 2008 | — | — | 26 | #4,029 |
| 2007 | — | — | 56 | #2,333 |
| 2006 | — | — | 31 | #3,446 |
| 2005 | — | — | 35 | #3,017 |
| 2004 | — | — | 38 | #2,785 |
| 2003 | — | — | 31 | #3,110 |
| 2002 | — | — | 30 | #3,085 |
| 2001 | — | — | 35 | #2,735 |
| 2000 | — | — | 32 | #2,858 |
| 1999 | — | — | 43 | #2,194 |
| 1998 | — | — | 36 | #2,443 |
| 1997 | — | — | 29 | #2,743 |
| 1996 | — | — | 36 | #2,294 |
| 1995 | — | — | 52 | #1,734 |
| 1994 | — | — | 41 | #2,038 |
| 1993 | — | — | 41 | #2,001 |
| 1992 | — | — | 36 | #2,168 |
| 1991 | — | — | 50 | #1,674 |
| 1990 | — | — | 48 | #1,698 |
| 1989 | — | — | 50 | #1,612 |
| 1988 | — | — | 42 | #1,703 |
| 1987 | — | — | 44 | #1,609 |
| 1986 | — | — | 53 | #1,358 |
| 1985 | — | — | 46 | #1,480 |
| 1984 | — | — | 51 | #1,319 |
| 1983 | — | — | 55 | #1,251 |
| 1982 | — | — | 38 | #1,619 |
| 1981 | — | — | 38 | #1,599 |
| 1980 | — | — | 68 | #1,102 |
| 1979 | — | — | 52 | #1,289 |
| 1978 | — | — | 57 | #1,184 |
| 1977 | — | — | 74 | #1,005 |
| 1976 | — | — | 80 | #938 |
| 1975 | — | — | 71 | #981 |
| 1974 | — | — | 99 | #811 |
| 1973 | — | — | 62 | #1,035 |
| 1972 | — | — | 76 | #920 |
| 1971 | — | — | 54 | #1,126 |
| 1970 | — | — | 39 | #1,348 |
| 1969 | — | — | 33 | #1,412 |
| 1968 | — | — | 20 | #1,827 |
| 1967 | — | — | 30 | #1,407 |
| 1966 | — | — | 34 | #1,325 |
| 1965 | — | — | 19 | #1,852 |
| 1964 | — | — | 28 | #1,509 |
| 1963 | — | — | 38 | #1,274 |
| 1962 | — | — | 38 | #1,278 |
| 1961 | — | — | 32 | #1,436 |
| 1960 | — | — | 33 | #1,397 |
| 1959 | — | — | 37 | #1,298 |
| 1958 | — | — | 19 | #1,887 |
| 1957 | — | — | 25 | #1,630 |
| 1956 | — | — | 32 | #1,381 |
| 1955 | — | — | 22 | #1,678 |
| 1954 | — | — | 21 | #1,703 |
| 1953 | — | — | 19 | #1,830 |
| 1952 | — | — | 23 | #1,614 |
| 1951 | — | — | 19 | #1,770 |
| 1950 | — | — | 19 | #1,741 |
| 1949 | — | — | 22 | #1,611 |
| 1948 | — | — | 14 | #2,111 |
| 1947 | — | — | 14 | #2,160 |
| 1946 | — | — | 11 | #2,395 |
| 1945 | — | — | 12 | #2,121 |
| 1944 | — | — | 16 | #1,804 |
| 1943 | — | — | 21 | #1,573 |
| 1942 | — | — | 18 | #1,726 |
| 1941 | — | — | 15 | #1,894 |
| 1940 | — | — | 19 | #1,623 |
| 1939 | — | — | 21 | #1,484 |
| 1938 | — | — | 16 | #1,811 |
| 1937 | — | — | 16 | #1,821 |
| 1936 | — | — | 19 | #1,583 |
| 1935 | — | — | 23 | #1,450 |
| 1934 | — | — | 18 | #1,721 |
| 1933 | — | — | 8 | #2,983 |
| 1932 | — | — | 20 | #1,646 |
| 1931 | — | — | 11 | #2,454 |
| 1930 | — | — | 20 | #1,688 |
| 1929 | — | — | 17 | #1,923 |
| 1928 | — | — | 18 | #1,895 |
| 1927 | — | — | 11 | #2,685 |
| 1926 | — | — | 18 | #1,905 |
| 1925 | — | — | 20 | #1,795 |
| 1924 | — | — | 10 | #3,008 |
| 1923 | — | — | 11 | #2,758 |
| 1921 | — | — | 6 | #4,281 |
| 1920 | — | — | 9 | #3,185 |
| 1919 | — | — | 10 | #2,852 |
| 1918 | — | — | 8 | #3,346 |
| 1917 | — | — | 7 | #3,519 |
| 1916 | — | — | 8 | #3,156 |
| 1915 | — | — | 9 | #2,810 |
| 1914 | — | — | 12 | #1,963 |
| 1913 | — | — | 6 | #2,782 |
| 1912 | — | — | 7 | #2,250 |
| 1909 | — | — | 5 | #1,663 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).