Meaning not yet researched.
Rodrigo: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 614 in 2025. Its best rank was #291 in 2007.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #291 in 2007; #492 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Rodrigo in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#492 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 2007, at #291.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Rodrigo: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 614 boys in 2025. Peak: #291 in 2007 · most boys in one year: 1,177 (2007).
In 2025, 614 US boys were named Rodrigo, making it the 492nd most common boys’ name of the year, down 7 places from #485 in 2024. That is 26 fewer than the 640 boys named Rodrigo in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #291, reached in 2007. That year also had the most boys given the name: 1,177. For comparison, it was #460 in 2015 and #1,164 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Rodrigo in 107 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1918 with 6 babies. In all, 27,759 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 2000s, with 8,032 babies named Rodrigo.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 5,678 US boys were named Rodrigo; the busiest of those years was 2024, with 640. In 2025 that was about 1 in 2,782 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Rodrigo ranked highest in Texas in 2025, at #201 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Roderick (47,446 babies since 1880) and Roderic (2,321 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Rodrygo and Rodericus are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Rodrygo (56), Rodericus (10).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Rodrigo in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 26 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 195 | #201 | #226 |
| Florida | 57 | #347 | #403 |
| Arizona | 22 | #353 | #315 |
| Nevada | 9 | #357 | #328 |
| California | 95 | #367 | #265 |
| Maryland | 13 | #404 | — |
| Colorado | 15 | #416 | #513 |
| Kansas | 8 | #460 | #565 |
| Oregon | 7 | #516 | #486 |
| New Jersey | 15 | #518 | #507 |
| Arkansas | 6 | #541 | — |
| Massachusetts | 9 | #547 | — |
| Connecticut | 5 | #560 | — |
| Illinois | 16 | #598 | #432 |
| Georgia | 17 | #616 | #587 |
| Washington | 10 | #675 | #746 |
| New York | 22 | #683 | #938 |
| Kentucky | 6 | #693 | — |
| Tennessee | 9 | #761 | #899 |
| Utah | 5 | #790 | — |
| Missouri | 6 | #851 | — |
| South Carolina | 5 | #852 | — |
| Virginia | 8 | #860 | #1,111 |
| North Carolina | 8 | #1,009 | #653 |
| Ohio | 5 | #1,439 | #894 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 614 | #492 |
| 2024 | — | — | 640 | #485 |
| 2023 | — | — | 607 | #497 |
| 2022 | — | — | 562 | #532 |
| 2021 | — | — | 494 | #571 |
| 2020 | — | — | 482 | #577 |
| 2019 | — | — | 548 | #521 |
| 2018 | — | — | 573 | #501 |
| 2017 | — | — | 566 | #513 |
| 2016 | — | — | 592 | #507 |
| 2015 | — | — | 661 | #460 |
| 2014 | — | — | 576 | #489 |
| 2013 | — | — | 710 | #418 |
| 2012 | — | — | 639 | #434 |
| 2011 | — | — | 650 | #422 |
| 2010 | — | — | 676 | #415 |
| 2009 | — | — | 812 | #376 |
| 2008 | — | — | 1,014 | #326 |
| 2007 | — | — | 1,177 | #291 |
| 2006 | — | — | 823 | #363 |
| 2005 | — | — | 731 | #392 |
| 2004 | — | — | 700 | #387 |
| 2003 | — | — | 736 | #362 |
| 2002 | — | — | 665 | #392 |
| 2001 | — | — | 694 | #378 |
| 2000 | — | — | 680 | #383 |
| 1999 | — | — | 724 | #361 |
| 1998 | — | — | 511 | #445 |
| 1997 | — | — | 514 | #437 |
| 1996 | — | — | 616 | #378 |
| 1995 | — | — | 605 | #386 |
| 1994 | — | — | 423 | #489 |
| 1993 | — | — | 434 | #484 |
| 1992 | — | — | 464 | #467 |
| 1991 | — | — | 376 | #513 |
| 1990 | — | — | 378 | #508 |
| 1989 | — | — | 252 | #629 |
| 1988 | — | — | 231 | #622 |
| 1987 | — | — | 193 | #658 |
| 1986 | 5 | #12,347 | 231 | #587 |
| 1985 | — | — | 183 | #648 |
| 1984 | — | — | 187 | #623 |
| 1983 | — | — | 210 | #585 |
| 1982 | — | — | 222 | #576 |
| 1981 | — | — | 200 | #605 |
| 1980 | — | — | 179 | #649 |
| 1979 | — | — | 166 | #665 |
| 1978 | — | — | 187 | #611 |
| 1977 | — | — | 162 | #663 |
| 1976 | — | — | 174 | #623 |
| 1975 | — | — | 153 | #668 |
| 1974 | — | — | 144 | #679 |
| 1973 | — | — | 159 | #627 |
| 1972 | — | — | 114 | #743 |
| 1971 | — | — | 95 | #835 |
| 1970 | — | — | 108 | #794 |
| 1969 | — | — | 72 | #902 |
| 1968 | — | — | 57 | #982 |
| 1967 | — | — | 60 | #942 |
| 1966 | — | — | 55 | #990 |
| 1965 | — | — | 57 | #985 |
| 1964 | — | — | 69 | #919 |
| 1963 | — | — | 66 | #928 |
| 1962 | — | — | 60 | #995 |
| 1961 | — | — | 46 | #1,172 |
| 1960 | — | — | 50 | #1,114 |
| 1959 | — | — | 40 | #1,242 |
| 1958 | — | — | 42 | #1,202 |
| 1957 | — | — | 33 | #1,384 |
| 1956 | — | — | 48 | #1,105 |
| 1955 | — | — | 39 | #1,213 |
| 1954 | — | — | 46 | #1,111 |
| 1953 | — | — | 26 | #1,503 |
| 1952 | — | — | 33 | #1,317 |
| 1951 | — | — | 33 | #1,291 |
| 1950 | — | — | 39 | #1,164 |
| 1949 | — | — | 29 | #1,371 |
| 1948 | — | — | 27 | #1,424 |
| 1947 | — | — | 24 | #1,546 |
| 1946 | — | — | 24 | #1,466 |
| 1945 | — | — | 14 | #1,915 |
| 1944 | — | — | 21 | #1,517 |
| 1943 | — | — | 17 | #1,820 |
| 1942 | — | — | 14 | #2,030 |
| 1941 | — | — | 15 | #1,886 |
| 1940 | — | — | 25 | #1,360 |
| 1939 | — | — | 15 | #1,858 |
| 1938 | — | — | 16 | #1,803 |
| 1937 | — | — | 19 | #1,623 |
| 1936 | — | — | 17 | #1,715 |
| 1935 | — | — | 22 | #1,480 |
| 1934 | — | — | 15 | #1,916 |
| 1933 | — | — | 16 | #1,819 |
| 1932 | — | — | 16 | #1,908 |
| 1931 | — | — | 21 | #1,582 |
| 1930 | — | — | 16 | #1,944 |
| 1929 | — | — | 26 | #1,442 |
| 1928 | — | — | 25 | #1,514 |
| 1927 | — | — | 23 | #1,634 |
| 1926 | — | — | 22 | #1,649 |
| 1925 | — | — | 22 | #1,668 |
| 1924 | — | — | 16 | #2,117 |
| 1923 | — | — | 26 | #1,487 |
| 1922 | — | — | 7 | #3,806 |
| 1921 | — | — | 5 | #4,856 |
| 1920 | — | — | 5 | #4,846 |
| 1918 | — | — | 6 | #4,085 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).