Meaning not yet researched.
Remi: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 2,023 in 2025. Its best rank was #118 in 2022.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #118 in 2022; #145 in 2025. About 86% of babies named Remi in 2025 were girls.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#145 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 2022, at #118.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Remi: US girls and boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 2,023 girls in 2025. Peak: #118 in 2022 · most girls in one year: 2,392 (2022).
In 2025, 2,023 US girls were named Remi, making it the 145th most common girls’ name of the year, the same rank as in 2024. That is 25 more than the 1,998 girls named Remi in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #118, reached in 2022. That year also had the most girls given the name: 2,392. For comparison, it was #502 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.
In 2025, 323 US boys were named Remi, making it the 787th most common boys’ name of the year, up 25 places from #812 in 2024. That is 12 more than the 311 boys named Remi in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #720, reached in 2021. That year also had the most boys given the name: 360. For comparison, it was #1,713 in 2015 and #3,259 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Remi in 86 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1915 with 8 babies. In all, 27,066 US babies have been given the name, 85% of them girls and 15% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2020s, with 15,052 babies named Remi.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 19,006 US girls were named Remi; the busiest of those years was 2022, with 2,392. In 2025 that was about 1 in 794 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Remi ranked highest in Utah in 2025, at #45 for girls there. It was in the top 100 in 10 states (counting DC). Related spellings in the SSA files include Remy (20,746 babies since 1880) and Remmy (970 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Remie, Remmi and Remmie are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Dutch and Japanese. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Remie (581), Remmi (542), Remmie (243), Remii (159), Remee (120), Remiah (82), Remey (30), Remya (29), Rem (26), Rimi (11), Remia (10), Reimi (7), and more.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Remi in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 6 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | 71 | #45 | #111 |
| South Dakota | 16 | #47 | — |
| Montana | 16 | #47 | #208 |
| Louisiana | 58 | #57 | #176 |
| Hawaii | 11 | #66 | — |
| West Virginia | 19 | #72 | #399 |
| Mississippi | 28 | #74 | #477 |
| Nevada | 28 | #76 | — |
| Idaho | 25 | #77 | #195 |
| Kentucky | 47 | #86 | #422 |
| Missouri | 53 | #111 | #257 |
| Colorado | 48 | #112 | #405 |
| Iowa | 28 | #114 | #509 |
| Arizona | 52 | #120 | #281 |
| Alabama | 36 | #124 | #931 |
| Nebraska | 18 | #130 | #274 |
| Ohio | 84 | #131 | #383 |
| Pennsylvania | 80 | #132 | #668 |
| Tennessee | 57 | #132 | #542 |
| North Dakota | 8 | #136 | — |
| Oregon | 25 | #139 | #511 |
| Washington | 50 | #140 | #429 |
| Oklahoma | 27 | #141 | #317 |
| Indiana | 48 | #143 | #437 |
| Rhode Island | 7 | #145 | — |
| Maine | 8 | #147 | — |
| California | 201 | #149 | #561 |
| Kansas | 22 | #153 | #266 |
| New Mexico | 10 | #155 | — |
| North Carolina | 64 | #161 | #626 |
| Arkansas | 19 | #162 | — |
| South Carolina | 28 | #170 | — |
| Massachusetts | 33 | #172 | #936 |
| New Jersey | 48 | #172 | #605 |
| Georgia | 59 | #174 | #656 |
| Minnesota | 31 | #179 | #854 |
| Michigan | 49 | #180 | #438 |
| Wisconsin | 30 | #187 | #511 |
| Illinois | 50 | #201 | #571 |
| Florida | 91 | #207 | #642 |
| Texas | 164 | #209 | #737 |
| Connecticut | 16 | #218 | #564 |
| Virginia | 38 | #219 | — |
| New York | 77 | #226 | #779 |
| Maryland | 23 | #232 | #1,013 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2,023 | #145 | 323 | #787 |
| 2024 | 1,998 | #145 | 311 | #812 |
| 2023 | 2,180 | #127 | 300 | #819 |
| 2022 | 2,392 | #118 | 348 | #740 |
| 2021 | 2,298 | #122 | 360 | #720 |
| 2020 | 2,206 | #125 | 313 | #770 |
| 2019 | 1,861 | #154 | 241 | #914 |
| 2018 | 1,668 | #177 | 182 | #1,089 |
| 2017 | 1,278 | #249 | 190 | #1,055 |
| 2016 | 1,102 | #296 | 176 | #1,114 |
| 2015 | 635 | #502 | 91 | #1,713 |
| 2014 | 435 | #659 | 88 | #1,723 |
| 2013 | 315 | #837 | 66 | #2,061 |
| 2012 | 242 | #1,042 | 66 | #2,088 |
| 2011 | 225 | #1,095 | 70 | #1,984 |
| 2010 | 199 | #1,219 | 65 | #2,091 |
| 2009 | 160 | #1,461 | 68 | #2,046 |
| 2008 | 133 | #1,683 | 57 | #2,319 |
| 2007 | 121 | #1,778 | 49 | #2,557 |
| 2006 | 120 | #1,741 | 27 | #3,755 |
| 2005 | 89 | #2,103 | 39 | #2,793 |
| 2004 | 86 | #2,112 | 35 | #2,943 |
| 2003 | 87 | #2,059 | 26 | #3,504 |
| 2002 | 101 | #1,789 | 23 | #3,751 |
| 2001 | 80 | #2,091 | 40 | #2,471 |
| 2000 | 66 | #2,367 | 25 | #3,403 |
| 1999 | 96 | #1,712 | 19 | #3,953 |
| 1998 | 79 | #1,936 | 26 | #3,075 |
| 1997 | 81 | #1,841 | 27 | #2,886 |
| 1996 | 65 | #2,122 | 16 | #4,148 |
| 1995 | 43 | #2,832 | 22 | #3,166 |
| 1994 | 43 | #2,836 | 12 | #5,050 |
| 1993 | 37 | #3,147 | 23 | #3,014 |
| 1992 | 41 | #2,911 | 15 | #4,062 |
| 1991 | 37 | #3,078 | 19 | #3,302 |
| 1990 | 23 | #4,346 | 19 | #3,278 |
| 1989 | 17 | #5,221 | 21 | #2,975 |
| 1988 | 15 | #5,530 | 14 | #3,664 |
| 1987 | 15 | #5,255 | 10 | #4,511 |
| 1986 | 11 | #6,481 | 10 | #4,397 |
| 1985 | 9 | #7,409 | 10 | #4,276 |
| 1984 | — | — | 5 | #7,083 |
| 1983 | 12 | #5,729 | 9 | #4,416 |
| 1982 | 13 | #5,456 | — | — |
| 1981 | 8 | #7,949 | 14 | #3,184 |
| 1980 | 8 | #7,952 | 7 | #5,384 |
| 1979 | 9 | #7,150 | 8 | #4,754 |
| 1978 | 9 | #6,791 | 10 | #3,792 |
| 1977 | 9 | #6,734 | 11 | #3,553 |
| 1976 | 6 | #8,932 | 10 | #3,661 |
| 1975 | 9 | #6,320 | 7 | #4,677 |
| 1974 | 6 | #8,454 | — | — |
| 1973 | 7 | #7,234 | 9 | #3,630 |
| 1972 | 6 | #7,992 | 6 | #4,857 |
| 1971 | 7 | #7,176 | 8 | #3,884 |
| 1970 | 6 | #7,761 | 12 | #2,853 |
| 1969 | 9 | #5,354 | 10 | #3,021 |
| 1968 | 30 | #2,234 | 12 | #2,548 |
| 1967 | 5 | #7,585 | — | — |
| 1966 | — | — | 9 | #2,936 |
| 1965 | — | — | 7 | #3,482 |
| 1964 | 5 | #7,562 | 10 | #2,804 |
| 1963 | 5 | #7,391 | 5 | #4,500 |
| 1962 | — | — | 10 | #2,809 |
| 1961 | — | — | 5 | #4,531 |
| 1960 | — | — | 12 | #2,510 |
| 1958 | — | — | 7 | #3,506 |
| 1955 | — | — | 5 | #4,279 |
| 1954 | — | — | 6 | #3,738 |
| 1953 | — | — | 11 | #2,500 |
| 1952 | — | — | 8 | #3,054 |
| 1951 | — | — | 8 | #3,017 |
| 1950 | — | — | 7 | #3,259 |
| 1949 | — | — | 5 | #4,102 |
| 1947 | — | — | 11 | #2,476 |
| 1946 | — | — | 7 | #3,117 |
| 1942 | — | — | 5 | #3,946 |
| 1941 | — | — | 5 | #3,906 |
| 1933 | — | — | 5 | #4,051 |
| 1928 | — | — | 5 | #4,618 |
| 1926 | — | — | 13 | #2,404 |
| 1923 | — | — | 5 | #4,763 |
| 1922 | — | — | 5 | #4,829 |
| 1920 | — | — | 6 | #4,183 |
| 1918 | — | — | 15 | #2,142 |
| 1915 | — | — | 8 | #3,014 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).