Meaning not yet researched.
Osborne: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 22 in 2025. Its best rank was #699 in 1910.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #699 in 1910; #4,663 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Osborne in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#4,663 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1910, at #699.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Osborne: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 22 boys in 2025. Peak: #699 in 1910 · most boys in one year: 47 (1915).
In 2025, 22 US boys were named Osborne, making it the 4,663rd most common boys’ name of the year, up 1,447 places from #6,110 in 2024. That is 7 more than the 15 boys named Osborne in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #699, reached in 1910. The most boys given the name in a single year was 47, in 1915. For comparison, it was #7,894 in 2015 and #1,933 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Osborne in 117 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1880 with 7 babies. In all, 1,754 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 1910s, with 314 babies named Osborne.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 158 US boys were named Osborne; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 22. In 2025 that was about 1 in 77,640 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 22 | #4,663 |
| 2024 | — | — | 15 | #6,110 |
| 2023 | — | — | 14 | #6,430 |
| 2022 | — | — | 18 | #5,375 |
| 2021 | — | — | 16 | #5,718 |
| 2020 | — | — | 22 | #4,508 |
| 2019 | — | — | 21 | #4,756 |
| 2018 | — | — | 8 | #9,437 |
| 2017 | — | — | 13 | #6,572 |
| 2016 | — | — | 9 | #8,635 |
| 2015 | — | — | 10 | #7,894 |
| 2014 | — | — | 6 | #11,754 |
| 2013 | — | — | 9 | #8,589 |
| 2012 | — | — | 6 | #11,878 |
| 2011 | — | — | 8 | #9,381 |
| 2010 | — | — | 8 | #9,444 |
| 2009 | — | — | 5 | #13,946 |
| 2007 | — | — | 5 | #13,869 |
| 2006 | — | — | 5 | #13,484 |
| 2002 | — | — | 7 | #9,132 |
| 2001 | — | — | 6 | #10,194 |
| 2000 | — | — | 6 | #10,000 |
| 1999 | — | — | 5 | #11,136 |
| 1996 | — | — | 5 | #10,112 |
| 1990 | — | — | 5 | #9,122 |
| 1988 | — | — | 11 | #4,379 |
| 1986 | — | — | 6 | #6,505 |
| 1985 | — | — | 5 | #7,304 |
| 1984 | — | — | 7 | #5,421 |
| 1982 | — | — | 5 | #7,078 |
| 1981 | — | — | 12 | #3,553 |
| 1980 | — | — | 5 | #6,999 |
| 1978 | — | — | 8 | #4,450 |
| 1976 | — | — | 7 | #4,784 |
| 1975 | — | — | 5 | #6,060 |
| 1974 | — | — | 7 | #4,499 |
| 1973 | — | — | 5 | #5,659 |
| 1972 | — | — | 5 | #5,540 |
| 1971 | — | — | 7 | #4,262 |
| 1970 | — | — | 11 | #3,021 |
| 1969 | — | — | 5 | #4,845 |
| 1967 | — | — | 5 | #4,390 |
| 1966 | — | — | 9 | #2,923 |
| 1965 | — | — | 8 | #3,179 |
| 1964 | — | — | 15 | #2,172 |
| 1963 | — | — | 17 | #2,022 |
| 1962 | — | — | 6 | #3,920 |
| 1961 | — | — | 9 | #3,043 |
| 1960 | — | — | 17 | #2,019 |
| 1959 | — | — | 20 | #1,847 |
| 1958 | — | — | 19 | #1,878 |
| 1957 | — | — | 21 | #1,779 |
| 1956 | — | — | 13 | #2,342 |
| 1955 | — | — | 16 | #2,026 |
| 1954 | — | — | 13 | #2,285 |
| 1953 | — | — | 28 | #1,449 |
| 1952 | — | — | 13 | #2,228 |
| 1951 | — | — | 17 | #1,887 |
| 1950 | — | — | 16 | #1,933 |
| 1949 | — | — | 22 | #1,601 |
| 1948 | — | — | 16 | #1,926 |
| 1947 | — | — | 28 | #1,414 |
| 1946 | — | — | 18 | #1,741 |
| 1945 | — | — | 18 | #1,614 |
| 1944 | — | — | 15 | #1,861 |
| 1943 | — | — | 17 | #1,812 |
| 1942 | — | — | 21 | #1,577 |
| 1941 | — | — | 20 | #1,573 |
| 1940 | — | — | 16 | #1,781 |
| 1939 | — | — | 16 | #1,775 |
| 1938 | — | — | 13 | #2,066 |
| 1937 | — | — | 22 | #1,476 |
| 1936 | — | — | 30 | #1,220 |
| 1935 | — | — | 24 | #1,416 |
| 1934 | — | — | 13 | #2,094 |
| 1933 | — | — | 17 | #1,757 |
| 1932 | — | — | 26 | #1,374 |
| 1931 | — | — | 21 | #1,580 |
| 1930 | — | — | 22 | #1,591 |
| 1929 | — | — | 19 | #1,774 |
| 1928 | — | — | 26 | #1,477 |
| 1927 | — | — | 29 | #1,398 |
| 1926 | — | — | 33 | #1,273 |
| 1925 | — | — | 38 | #1,163 |
| 1924 | — | — | 30 | #1,374 |
| 1923 | — | — | 29 | #1,376 |
| 1922 | — | — | 31 | #1,327 |
| 1921 | — | — | 36 | #1,221 |
| 1920 | — | — | 37 | #1,203 |
| 1919 | — | — | 35 | #1,205 |
| 1918 | — | — | 37 | #1,148 |
| 1917 | — | — | 41 | #1,031 |
| 1916 | — | — | 38 | #1,054 |
| 1915 | — | — | 47 | #913 |
| 1914 | — | — | 30 | #1,044 |
| 1913 | — | — | 25 | #1,019 |
| 1912 | — | — | 28 | #847 |
| 1911 | — | — | 14 | #916 |
| 1910 | — | — | 19 | #699 |
| 1909 | — | — | 6 | #1,408 |
| 1908 | — | — | 5 | #1,539 |
| 1907 | — | — | 6 | #1,303 |
| 1906 | — | — | 7 | #1,090 |
| 1905 | — | — | 9 | #901 |
| 1903 | — | — | 6 | #1,099 |
| 1902 | — | — | 5 | #1,266 |
| 1901 | — | — | 5 | #1,169 |
| 1900 | — | — | 6 | #1,276 |
| 1899 | — | — | 6 | #1,022 |
| 1896 | — | — | 6 | #1,073 |
| 1894 | — | — | 7 | #931 |
| 1893 | — | — | 5 | #1,148 |
| 1888 | — | — | 7 | #895 |
| 1886 | — | — | 6 | #936 |
| 1885 | — | — | 6 | #912 |
| 1884 | — | — | 5 | #1,081 |
| 1880 | — | — | 7 | #789 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).