Meaning not yet researched.
Ofelia: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 87 in 2025. Its best rank was #533 in 1934.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #533 in 1934; #2,148 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Ofelia in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#2,148 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1934, at #533.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Ofelia: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 87 girls in 2025. Peak: #533 in 1934 · most girls in one year: 154 (1929).
In 2025, 87 US girls were named Ofelia, making it the 2,148th most common girls’ name of the year, down 238 places from #1,910 in 2024. That is 18 fewer than the 105 girls named Ofelia in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #533, reached in 1934. The most girls given the name in a single year was 154, in 1929. For comparison, it was #2,993 in 2015 and #820 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Ofelia in 123 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1900 with 8 babies. In all, 8,997 US babies have been given the name, 99.9% of them girls and 0.1% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1950s, with 1,109 babies named Ofelia.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 821 US girls were named Ofelia; the busiest of those years was 2024, with 105. In 2025 that was about 1 in 18,474 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Ofelia ranked highest in California in 2025, at #1,396 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Ophelia (25,785 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Ofilia are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Italian and Polish. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Ofilia (472).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Ofelia in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 48 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 17 | #1,396 | #1,643 |
| Illinois | 5 | #1,572 | — |
| Texas | 14 | #1,691 | #2,025 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 87 | #2,148 | — | — |
| 2024 | 105 | #1,910 | — | — |
| 2023 | 68 | #2,607 | — | — |
| 2022 | 83 | #2,271 | — | — |
| 2021 | 93 | #2,067 | — | — |
| 2020 | 85 | #2,146 | — | — |
| 2019 | 78 | #2,322 | — | — |
| 2018 | 74 | #2,430 | — | — |
| 2017 | 79 | #2,335 | — | — |
| 2016 | 69 | #2,586 | — | — |
| 2015 | 58 | #2,993 | — | — |
| 2014 | 45 | #3,527 | — | — |
| 2013 | 46 | #3,448 | — | — |
| 2012 | 35 | #4,270 | — | — |
| 2011 | 49 | #3,341 | — | — |
| 2010 | 46 | #3,503 | — | — |
| 2009 | 50 | #3,342 | — | — |
| 2008 | 60 | #2,950 | — | — |
| 2007 | 69 | #2,674 | — | — |
| 2006 | 57 | #3,009 | — | — |
| 2005 | 56 | #2,926 | — | — |
| 2004 | 54 | #2,954 | — | — |
| 2003 | 48 | #3,114 | — | — |
| 2002 | 64 | #2,489 | — | — |
| 2001 | 52 | #2,839 | — | — |
| 2000 | 54 | #2,734 | — | — |
| 1999 | 49 | #2,807 | — | — |
| 1998 | 50 | #2,719 | — | — |
| 1997 | 47 | #2,689 | — | — |
| 1996 | 59 | #2,273 | — | — |
| 1995 | 57 | #2,334 | — | — |
| 1994 | 56 | #2,340 | — | — |
| 1993 | 66 | #2,084 | — | — |
| 1992 | 72 | #1,942 | — | — |
| 1991 | 73 | #1,926 | — | — |
| 1990 | 47 | #2,556 | — | — |
| 1989 | 63 | #2,018 | — | — |
| 1988 | 52 | #2,206 | — | — |
| 1987 | 58 | #1,960 | — | — |
| 1986 | 69 | #1,709 | — | — |
| 1985 | 67 | #1,723 | — | — |
| 1984 | 52 | #1,983 | — | — |
| 1983 | 63 | #1,727 | — | — |
| 1982 | 66 | #1,711 | — | — |
| 1981 | 88 | #1,403 | — | — |
| 1980 | 83 | #1,468 | — | — |
| 1979 | 64 | #1,724 | — | — |
| 1978 | 72 | #1,544 | — | — |
| 1977 | 63 | #1,675 | — | — |
| 1976 | 77 | #1,390 | — | — |
| 1975 | 80 | #1,347 | — | — |
| 1974 | 73 | #1,409 | — | — |
| 1973 | 61 | #1,542 | — | — |
| 1972 | 74 | #1,361 | — | — |
| 1971 | 61 | #1,582 | — | — |
| 1970 | 59 | #1,614 | — | — |
| 1969 | 69 | #1,396 | — | — |
| 1968 | 63 | #1,428 | — | — |
| 1967 | 58 | #1,470 | — | — |
| 1966 | 75 | #1,249 | — | — |
| 1965 | 79 | #1,216 | — | — |
| 1964 | 80 | #1,236 | — | — |
| 1963 | 71 | #1,313 | — | — |
| 1962 | 83 | #1,216 | — | — |
| 1961 | 72 | #1,316 | — | — |
| 1960 | 90 | #1,152 | — | — |
| 1959 | 88 | #1,139 | — | — |
| 1958 | 107 | #1,005 | — | — |
| 1957 | 104 | #1,032 | — | — |
| 1956 | 92 | #1,075 | — | — |
| 1955 | 113 | #926 | — | — |
| 1954 | 98 | #989 | — | — |
| 1953 | 138 | #781 | — | — |
| 1952 | 135 | #769 | — | — |
| 1951 | 120 | #817 | — | — |
| 1950 | 114 | #820 | — | — |
| 1949 | 131 | #750 | — | — |
| 1948 | 125 | #766 | — | — |
| 1947 | 122 | #786 | — | — |
| 1946 | 135 | #693 | — | — |
| 1945 | 106 | #725 | — | — |
| 1944 | 114 | #704 | — | — |
| 1943 | 79 | #882 | — | — |
| 1942 | 104 | #742 | — | — |
| 1941 | 88 | #771 | — | — |
| 1940 | 100 | #700 | — | — |
| 1939 | 84 | #751 | — | — |
| 1938 | 85 | #755 | — | — |
| 1937 | 98 | #692 | 5 | #3,885 |
| 1936 | 90 | #705 | — | — |
| 1935 | 100 | #661 | — | — |
| 1934 | 148 | #533 | — | — |
| 1933 | 111 | #618 | — | — |
| 1932 | 105 | #655 | — | — |
| 1931 | 130 | #580 | — | — |
| 1930 | 143 | #569 | — | — |
| 1929 | 154 | #550 | — | — |
| 1928 | 135 | #607 | — | — |
| 1927 | 111 | #692 | — | — |
| 1926 | 130 | #628 | — | — |
| 1925 | 151 | #586 | — | — |
| 1924 | 89 | #791 | — | — |
| 1923 | 89 | #777 | — | — |
| 1922 | 82 | #807 | — | — |
| 1921 | 62 | #944 | — | — |
| 1920 | 54 | #1,011 | — | — |
| 1919 | 38 | #1,233 | — | — |
| 1918 | 41 | #1,179 | — | — |
| 1917 | 30 | #1,364 | — | — |
| 1916 | 28 | #1,397 | — | — |
| 1915 | 21 | #1,663 | — | — |
| 1914 | 27 | #1,194 | — | — |
| 1913 | 10 | #2,131 | — | — |
| 1912 | 21 | #1,169 | — | — |
| 1911 | 14 | #1,277 | — | — |
| 1910 | 13 | #1,316 | — | — |
| 1909 | 5 | #2,458 | — | — |
| 1908 | 8 | #1,643 | — | — |
| 1907 | 13 | #1,124 | — | — |
| 1906 | 10 | #1,292 | — | — |
| 1905 | 6 | #1,866 | — | — |
| 1904 | 10 | #1,226 | — | — |
| 1900 | 8 | #1,531 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).