Meaning not yet researched.
Mccoy: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 309 in 2025. Its best rank was #806 in 2025.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Its highest rank in 146 years of records is this year’s. About 98% of babies named Mccoy in 2025 were boys.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#806 for US boys in 2025, its highest rank in 146 years of records.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Mccoy: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 309 boys in 2025. Peak: #806 in 2025 · most boys in one year: 309 (2025).
In 2025, 309 US boys were named Mccoy, making it the 806th most common boys’ name of the year, up 105 places from #911 in 2024. That is 52 more than the 257 boys named Mccoy in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #806, reached in this year, 2025. That year also had the most boys given the name: 309. For comparison, it was #1,047 in 2015 and #2,084 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Mccoy in 105 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1905 with 5 babies. In all, 4,673 US babies have been given the name, 2.2% of them girls and 98% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2020s, with 1,654 babies named Mccoy.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 2,350 US boys were named Mccoy; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 309. In 2025 that was about 1 in 5,528 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Mccoy ranked highest in South Dakota in 2025, at #165 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Rarer spellings such as Mckoy are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
No related spellings pass our data threshold.
Rare spellings summarised here: Mckoy (281).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Mccoy in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 28 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | 9 | #165 | — |
| Montana | 7 | #192 | — |
| Idaho | 12 | #228 | #333 |
| Utah | 22 | #242 | #234 |
| Iowa | 10 | #363 | — |
| Minnesota | 16 | #367 | #529 |
| Missouri | 16 | #412 | #715 |
| Oregon | 8 | #464 | — |
| Kansas | 6 | #569 | #556 |
| Wisconsin | 8 | #604 | — |
| Indiana | 11 | #608 | — |
| Tennessee | 11 | #658 | — |
| Georgia | 13 | #744 | #1,330 |
| Ohio | 11 | #779 | #824 |
| Texas | 35 | #785 | #1,058 |
| Michigan | 9 | #815 | — |
| South Carolina | 5 | #829 | #731 |
| Illinois | 10 | #845 | — |
| Washington | 6 | #959 | #741 |
| Pennsylvania | 7 | #1,062 | — |
| North Carolina | 7 | #1,105 | #1,089 |
| Virginia | 5 | #1,201 | — |
| California | 13 | #1,404 | #1,598 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5 | #16,448 | 309 | #806 |
| 2024 | 9 | #10,812 | 257 | #911 |
| 2023 | 7 | #12,997 | 226 | #974 |
| 2022 | 9 | #10,931 | 281 | #861 |
| 2021 | 11 | #9,349 | 293 | #820 |
| 2020 | 7 | #13,026 | 240 | #930 |
| 2019 | 9 | #11,073 | 204 | #1,021 |
| 2018 | 9 | #11,143 | 197 | #1,035 |
| 2017 | — | — | 171 | #1,125 |
| 2016 | 6 | #15,575 | 172 | #1,128 |
| 2015 | 7 | #13,979 | 191 | #1,047 |
| 2014 | 7 | #14,068 | 154 | #1,199 |
| 2013 | 6 | #15,885 | 170 | #1,093 |
| 2012 | — | — | 127 | #1,343 |
| 2011 | — | — | 94 | #1,629 |
| 2010 | — | — | 88 | #1,734 |
| 2009 | — | — | 66 | #2,088 |
| 2008 | 8 | #13,391 | 55 | #2,367 |
| 2007 | — | — | 48 | #2,589 |
| 2006 | — | — | 37 | #3,011 |
| 2005 | 5 | #18,239 | 42 | #2,642 |
| 2004 | — | — | 39 | #2,728 |
| 2003 | — | — | 35 | #2,827 |
| 2002 | — | — | 29 | #3,155 |
| 2001 | — | — | 33 | #2,844 |
| 2000 | — | — | 26 | #3,265 |
| 1999 | — | — | 39 | #2,326 |
| 1998 | — | — | 33 | #2,584 |
| 1997 | — | — | 21 | #3,422 |
| 1996 | — | — | 21 | #3,362 |
| 1995 | — | — | 25 | #2,896 |
| 1994 | — | — | 15 | #4,219 |
| 1993 | — | — | 14 | #4,378 |
| 1992 | — | — | 17 | #3,695 |
| 1991 | — | — | 5 | #9,123 |
| 1990 | — | — | 9 | #5,665 |
| 1989 | — | — | 7 | #6,690 |
| 1988 | — | — | 7 | #6,223 |
| 1987 | — | — | 5 | #7,735 |
| 1986 | — | — | 9 | #4,712 |
| 1985 | — | — | 7 | #5,549 |
| 1983 | — | — | 5 | #6,946 |
| 1982 | — | — | 6 | #6,130 |
| 1981 | — | — | 7 | #5,286 |
| 1978 | — | — | 7 | #4,869 |
| 1977 | — | — | 5 | #6,493 |
| 1976 | — | — | 5 | #6,165 |
| 1971 | — | — | 6 | #4,735 |
| 1969 | — | — | 6 | #4,245 |
| 1968 | — | — | 7 | #3,570 |
| 1964 | — | — | 6 | #3,891 |
| 1963 | — | — | 6 | #3,892 |
| 1962 | — | — | 6 | #3,885 |
| 1961 | — | — | 8 | #3,273 |
| 1960 | — | — | 5 | #4,406 |
| 1959 | — | — | 14 | #2,263 |
| 1958 | — | — | 9 | #2,962 |
| 1957 | — | — | 8 | #3,172 |
| 1956 | — | — | 18 | #1,924 |
| 1955 | — | — | 9 | #2,903 |
| 1954 | — | — | 10 | #2,682 |
| 1953 | — | — | 12 | #2,357 |
| 1952 | — | — | 10 | #2,622 |
| 1951 | — | — | 7 | #3,255 |
| 1950 | — | — | 14 | #2,084 |
| 1949 | — | — | 16 | #1,918 |
| 1948 | — | — | 15 | #1,998 |
| 1947 | — | — | 11 | #2,460 |
| 1946 | — | — | 13 | #2,109 |
| 1945 | — | — | 19 | #1,559 |
| 1944 | — | — | 9 | #2,573 |
| 1943 | — | — | 13 | #2,141 |
| 1942 | — | — | 14 | #2,017 |
| 1941 | — | — | 16 | #1,804 |
| 1940 | — | — | 19 | #1,607 |
| 1939 | — | — | 9 | #2,562 |
| 1938 | — | — | 11 | #2,279 |
| 1937 | — | — | 8 | #2,818 |
| 1936 | — | — | 15 | #1,854 |
| 1935 | — | — | 16 | #1,806 |
| 1934 | — | — | 17 | #1,766 |
| 1933 | — | — | 28 | #1,269 |
| 1932 | — | — | 12 | #2,277 |
| 1931 | — | — | 17 | #1,814 |
| 1930 | — | — | 15 | #2,033 |
| 1929 | — | — | 9 | #2,895 |
| 1928 | — | — | 10 | #2,781 |
| 1927 | — | — | 15 | #2,166 |
| 1926 | — | — | 8 | #3,292 |
| 1925 | — | — | 11 | #2,695 |
| 1924 | — | — | 13 | #2,430 |
| 1923 | — | — | 11 | #2,720 |
| 1922 | — | — | 17 | #2,006 |
| 1921 | — | — | 19 | #1,874 |
| 1920 | — | — | 23 | #1,627 |
| 1919 | — | — | 10 | #2,804 |
| 1918 | — | — | 18 | #1,877 |
| 1917 | — | — | 19 | #1,734 |
| 1916 | — | — | 25 | #1,402 |
| 1915 | — | — | 12 | #2,256 |
| 1914 | — | — | 14 | #1,742 |
| 1913 | — | — | 8 | #2,198 |
| 1912 | — | — | 7 | #2,181 |
| 1910 | — | — | 7 | #1,381 |
| 1905 | — | — | 5 | #1,359 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).