Meaning not yet researched.
Lamonte: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 15 in 2025. Its best rank was #845 in 1972.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #845 in 1972; #6,023 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Lamonte in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#6,023 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1972, at #845.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Lamonte: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 15 boys in 2025. Peak: #845 in 1972 · most boys in one year: 91 (1972).
In 2025, 15 US boys were named Lamonte, making it the 6,023rd most common boys’ name of the year, down 222 places from #5,801 in 2024. That is 1 fewer than the 16 boys named Lamonte in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #845, reached in 1972. That year also had the most boys given the name: 91. For comparison, it was #4,243 in 2015 and #1,593 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Lamonte in 107 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1915 with 6 babies. In all, 3,417 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 1970s, with 625 babies named Lamonte.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 205 US boys were named Lamonte; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 33. In 2025 that was about 1 in 113,872 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Lamont (24,189 babies since 1880).
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Lamonte in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 15 | #6,023 |
| 2024 | — | — | 16 | #5,801 |
| 2023 | — | — | 15 | #6,097 |
| 2022 | — | — | 13 | #6,689 |
| 2021 | — | — | 24 | #4,319 |
| 2020 | — | — | 23 | #4,359 |
| 2019 | — | — | 18 | #5,269 |
| 2018 | — | — | 28 | #3,842 |
| 2017 | — | — | 20 | #4,853 |
| 2016 | — | — | 33 | #3,405 |
| 2015 | — | — | 24 | #4,243 |
| 2014 | — | — | 24 | #4,204 |
| 2013 | — | — | 35 | #3,162 |
| 2012 | — | — | 46 | #2,655 |
| 2011 | — | — | 36 | #3,144 |
| 2010 | — | — | 35 | #3,213 |
| 2009 | — | — | 43 | #2,825 |
| 2008 | — | — | 38 | #3,080 |
| 2007 | — | — | 50 | #2,525 |
| 2006 | — | — | 37 | #3,007 |
| 2005 | — | — | 38 | #2,826 |
| 2004 | — | — | 37 | #2,824 |
| 2003 | — | — | 44 | #2,412 |
| 2002 | — | — | 46 | #2,277 |
| 2001 | — | — | 47 | #2,204 |
| 2000 | — | — | 50 | #2,035 |
| 1999 | — | — | 44 | #2,154 |
| 1998 | — | — | 62 | #1,676 |
| 1997 | — | — | 56 | #1,743 |
| 1996 | — | — | 45 | #1,976 |
| 1995 | — | — | 52 | #1,721 |
| 1994 | — | — | 73 | #1,367 |
| 1993 | — | — | 70 | #1,389 |
| 1992 | — | — | 55 | #1,612 |
| 1991 | — | — | 68 | #1,376 |
| 1990 | — | — | 52 | #1,600 |
| 1989 | — | — | 40 | #1,882 |
| 1988 | — | — | 40 | #1,754 |
| 1987 | — | — | 31 | #2,001 |
| 1986 | — | — | 37 | #1,711 |
| 1985 | — | — | 38 | #1,659 |
| 1984 | — | — | 35 | #1,674 |
| 1983 | — | — | 42 | #1,482 |
| 1982 | — | — | 37 | #1,631 |
| 1981 | — | — | 24 | #2,170 |
| 1980 | — | — | 35 | #1,679 |
| 1979 | — | — | 41 | #1,479 |
| 1978 | — | — | 37 | #1,554 |
| 1977 | — | — | 37 | #1,530 |
| 1976 | — | — | 55 | #1,158 |
| 1975 | — | — | 62 | #1,061 |
| 1974 | — | — | 68 | #998 |
| 1973 | — | — | 76 | #926 |
| 1972 | — | — | 91 | #845 |
| 1971 | — | — | 91 | #858 |
| 1970 | — | — | 67 | #998 |
| 1969 | — | — | 74 | #890 |
| 1968 | — | — | 60 | #944 |
| 1967 | — | — | 49 | #1,054 |
| 1966 | — | — | 49 | #1,050 |
| 1965 | — | — | 38 | #1,249 |
| 1964 | — | — | 39 | #1,253 |
| 1963 | — | — | 32 | #1,391 |
| 1962 | — | — | 39 | #1,253 |
| 1961 | — | — | 31 | #1,454 |
| 1960 | — | — | 29 | #1,506 |
| 1959 | — | — | 29 | #1,483 |
| 1958 | — | — | 28 | #1,503 |
| 1957 | — | — | 25 | #1,611 |
| 1956 | — | — | 28 | #1,498 |
| 1955 | — | — | 20 | #1,759 |
| 1954 | — | — | 32 | #1,351 |
| 1953 | — | — | 20 | #1,748 |
| 1952 | — | — | 35 | #1,260 |
| 1951 | — | — | 20 | #1,709 |
| 1950 | — | — | 22 | #1,593 |
| 1949 | — | — | 25 | #1,483 |
| 1948 | — | — | 17 | #1,856 |
| 1947 | — | — | 17 | #1,886 |
| 1946 | — | — | 26 | #1,397 |
| 1945 | — | — | 10 | #2,326 |
| 1944 | — | — | 14 | #1,931 |
| 1943 | — | — | 16 | #1,877 |
| 1942 | — | — | 20 | #1,610 |
| 1941 | — | — | 16 | #1,795 |
| 1940 | — | — | 10 | #2,408 |
| 1939 | — | — | 13 | #2,012 |
| 1938 | — | — | 12 | #2,137 |
| 1936 | — | — | 7 | #3,032 |
| 1935 | — | — | 9 | #2,628 |
| 1934 | — | — | 9 | #2,665 |
| 1933 | — | — | 7 | #3,156 |
| 1932 | — | — | 6 | #3,583 |
| 1931 | — | — | 5 | #4,069 |
| 1930 | — | — | 7 | #3,452 |
| 1929 | — | — | 7 | #3,408 |
| 1927 | — | — | 5 | #4,511 |
| 1926 | — | — | 7 | #3,568 |
| 1925 | — | — | 7 | #3,580 |
| 1924 | — | — | 6 | #4,126 |
| 1923 | — | — | 7 | #3,660 |
| 1921 | — | — | 7 | #3,719 |
| 1920 | — | — | 6 | #4,056 |
| 1918 | — | — | 6 | #3,954 |
| 1917 | — | — | 6 | #3,775 |
| 1916 | — | — | 6 | #3,701 |
| 1915 | — | — | 6 | #3,641 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).