Meaning not yet researched.
Julio: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 436 in 2025. Its best rank was #194 in 1990.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #194 in 1990; #641 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Julio in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#641 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1990, at #194.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Julio: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 436 boys in 2025. Peak: #194 in 1990 · most boys in one year: 1,556 (1990).
In 2025, 436 US boys were named Julio, making it the 641st most common boys’ name of the year, down 41 places from #600 in 2024. That is 39 fewer than the 475 boys named Julio in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #194, reached in 1990. That year also had the most boys given the name: 1,556. For comparison, it was #458 in 2015 and #483 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Julio in 125 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1888 with 6 babies. In all, 64,197 US babies have been given the name, 0.7% of them girls and 99% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1990s, with 13,941 babies named Julio.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 5,228 US boys were named Julio; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 626. In 2025 that was about 1 in 3,918 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Julio ranked highest in New Mexico in 2025, at #253 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Julian (268,291 babies since 1880), Julius (85,038 babies since 1880), Jules (11,467 babies since 1880) and Juli (6,351 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Guilio are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Guilio (26).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Julio in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 30 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | 8 | #253 | — |
| Arizona | 25 | #316 | #312 |
| Texas | 99 | #374 | #256 |
| New Jersey | 21 | #389 | #323 |
| California | 80 | #414 | #292 |
| Oregon | 8 | #453 | #668 |
| Colorado | 12 | #485 | #571 |
| Tennessee | 14 | #536 | #651 |
| Washington | 13 | #546 | #526 |
| Nevada | 5 | #549 | #297 |
| North Carolina | 15 | #629 | #942 |
| Maryland | 7 | #659 | #467 |
| Florida | 24 | #674 | #422 |
| South Carolina | 5 | #801 | — |
| New York | 17 | #819 | #597 |
| Illinois | 10 | #833 | #460 |
| Virginia | 8 | #834 | #604 |
| Minnesota | 5 | #869 | #608 |
| Indiana | 6 | #901 | #600 |
| Michigan | 6 | #1,047 | #923 |
| Georgia | 5 | #1,440 | #580 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 436 | #641 |
| 2024 | — | — | 475 | #600 |
| 2023 | — | — | 511 | #573 |
| 2022 | — | — | 538 | #555 |
| 2021 | — | — | 458 | #607 |
| 2020 | — | — | 522 | #543 |
| 2019 | — | — | 540 | #530 |
| 2018 | — | — | 541 | #525 |
| 2017 | — | — | 581 | #501 |
| 2016 | — | — | 626 | #488 |
| 2015 | — | — | 664 | #458 |
| 2014 | — | — | 655 | #453 |
| 2013 | — | — | 718 | #412 |
| 2012 | — | — | 776 | #384 |
| 2011 | — | — | 819 | #363 |
| 2010 | — | — | 928 | #338 |
| 2009 | — | — | 1,061 | #305 |
| 2008 | — | — | 1,200 | #284 |
| 2007 | — | — | 1,306 | #266 |
| 2006 | — | — | 1,415 | #240 |
| 2005 | 6 | #15,387 | 1,517 | #227 |
| 2004 | — | — | 1,222 | #268 |
| 2003 | 6 | #14,720 | 1,158 | #271 |
| 2002 | — | — | 1,274 | #255 |
| 2001 | 5 | #16,552 | 1,320 | #254 |
| 2000 | 6 | #13,975 | 1,306 | #256 |
| 1999 | — | — | 1,244 | #252 |
| 1998 | 5 | #15,231 | 1,192 | #250 |
| 1997 | 9 | #9,381 | 1,288 | #238 |
| 1996 | 11 | #7,826 | 1,451 | #213 |
| 1995 | 11 | #7,761 | 1,284 | #233 |
| 1994 | 8 | #9,976 | 1,316 | #220 |
| 1993 | 12 | #7,229 | 1,455 | #206 |
| 1992 | 18 | #5,370 | 1,543 | #201 |
| 1991 | 18 | #5,275 | 1,512 | #204 |
| 1990 | 8 | #9,655 | 1,556 | #194 |
| 1989 | 16 | #5,402 | 1,186 | #229 |
| 1988 | 16 | #5,152 | 1,024 | #236 |
| 1987 | 9 | #7,645 | 1,009 | #232 |
| 1986 | 10 | #6,818 | 994 | #234 |
| 1985 | 13 | #5,492 | 887 | #256 |
| 1984 | 18 | #4,230 | 948 | #235 |
| 1983 | 14 | #4,985 | 768 | #271 |
| 1982 | 12 | #5,695 | 830 | #263 |
| 1981 | 5 | #11,117 | 887 | #249 |
| 1980 | 11 | #6,079 | 797 | #271 |
| 1979 | 13 | #5,223 | 825 | #257 |
| 1978 | 12 | #5,335 | 743 | #265 |
| 1977 | 9 | #6,553 | 718 | #272 |
| 1976 | 6 | #8,581 | 760 | #258 |
| 1975 | 11 | #5,296 | 764 | #259 |
| 1974 | 7 | #7,203 | 726 | #264 |
| 1973 | 7 | #6,976 | 652 | #282 |
| 1972 | 8 | #6,211 | 614 | #302 |
| 1971 | 8 | #6,268 | 604 | #312 |
| 1970 | 11 | #4,885 | 644 | #307 |
| 1969 | — | — | 578 | #322 |
| 1968 | — | — | 466 | #359 |
| 1967 | 6 | #6,360 | 466 | #346 |
| 1966 | 5 | #7,029 | 351 | #404 |
| 1965 | — | — | 375 | #406 |
| 1964 | — | — | 391 | #404 |
| 1963 | — | — | 406 | #400 |
| 1962 | — | — | 335 | #437 |
| 1961 | 6 | #6,165 | 339 | #434 |
| 1960 | 7 | #5,408 | 345 | #433 |
| 1959 | — | — | 294 | #465 |
| 1958 | 6 | #5,730 | 301 | #453 |
| 1957 | — | — | 298 | #446 |
| 1956 | — | — | 282 | #452 |
| 1955 | 6 | #5,498 | 259 | #461 |
| 1954 | — | — | 249 | #460 |
| 1953 | — | — | 255 | #450 |
| 1952 | — | — | 245 | #453 |
| 1951 | 7 | #4,589 | 190 | #492 |
| 1950 | — | — | 193 | #483 |
| 1949 | — | — | 176 | #503 |
| 1948 | — | — | 179 | #493 |
| 1947 | — | — | 135 | #585 |
| 1946 | — | — | 135 | #549 |
| 1945 | — | — | 140 | #504 |
| 1944 | — | — | 94 | #636 |
| 1943 | 5 | #5,007 | 125 | #569 |
| 1942 | — | — | 100 | #639 |
| 1941 | — | — | 94 | #625 |
| 1940 | — | — | 114 | #554 |
| 1939 | — | — | 88 | #625 |
| 1938 | — | — | 97 | #603 |
| 1937 | — | — | 118 | #535 |
| 1936 | — | — | 84 | #632 |
| 1935 | — | — | 101 | #579 |
| 1934 | — | — | 108 | #569 |
| 1933 | — | — | 101 | #572 |
| 1932 | — | — | 125 | #519 |
| 1931 | — | — | 131 | #502 |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,894 | 158 | #471 |
| 1929 | — | — | 145 | #488 |
| 1928 | 6 | #4,448 | 134 | #522 |
| 1927 | 8 | #3,716 | 148 | #499 |
| 1926 | — | — | 133 | #524 |
| 1925 | 5 | #5,384 | 140 | #519 |
| 1924 | — | — | 146 | #523 |
| 1923 | 11 | #3,018 | 135 | #523 |
| 1922 | — | — | 120 | #587 |
| 1921 | — | — | 118 | #585 |
| 1920 | — | — | 98 | #638 |
| 1919 | — | — | 100 | #606 |
| 1918 | — | — | 88 | #661 |
| 1917 | — | — | 78 | #684 |
| 1916 | — | — | 75 | #688 |
| 1915 | — | — | 69 | #710 |
| 1914 | — | — | 46 | #783 |
| 1913 | — | — | 46 | #662 |
| 1912 | — | — | 24 | #924 |
| 1911 | — | — | 24 | #635 |
| 1910 | — | — | 13 | #902 |
| 1909 | — | — | 17 | #665 |
| 1908 | — | — | 15 | #698 |
| 1907 | — | — | 7 | #1,149 |
| 1906 | — | — | 9 | #889 |
| 1905 | — | — | 9 | #879 |
| 1904 | — | — | 7 | #1,022 |
| 1903 | — | — | 11 | #719 |
| 1899 | — | — | 5 | #1,134 |
| 1888 | — | — | 6 | #988 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).