Meaning not yet researched.
Julianna: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 779 in 2025. Its best rank was #176 in 2010.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #176 in 2010; #398 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Julianna in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#398 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 2010, at #176.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Julianna: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 779 girls in 2025. Peak: #176 in 2010 · most girls in one year: 1,814 (2006).
In 2025, 779 US girls were named Julianna, making it the 398th most common girls’ name of the year, down 46 places from #352 in 2024. That is 101 fewer than the 880 girls named Julianna in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #176, reached in 2010. The most girls given the name in a single year was 1,814, in 2006. For comparison, it was #190 in 2015 and #1,236 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Julianna in 121 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1900 with 6 babies. In all, 52,311 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2000s, with 16,906 babies named Julianna.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 11,604 US girls were named Julianna; the busiest of those years was 2017, with 1,606. In 2025 that was about 1 in 2,063 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Julianna ranked highest in Hawaii in 2025, at #190 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Juliana (67,797 babies since 1880), Giuliana (12,081 babies since 1880), Julieta (11,689 babies since 1880) and Lianna (6,434 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Julieonna and Juleeanna are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Hungarian and Polish. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Julieonna (30), Juleeanna (5).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Julianna in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 21 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | 5 | #190 | #205 |
| New Jersey | 37 | #224 | #85 |
| California | 146 | #231 | #134 |
| Montana | 5 | #235 | — |
| Massachusetts | 21 | #278 | #121 |
| New York | 54 | #314 | #98 |
| Florida | 58 | #318 | #153 |
| Texas | 104 | #327 | #187 |
| Colorado | 19 | #327 | #427 |
| Kansas | 10 | #340 | #680 |
| Michigan | 22 | #398 | #333 |
| Nevada | 7 | #398 | #193 |
| Oklahoma | 10 | #415 | #371 |
| Pennsylvania | 26 | #423 | #147 |
| Connecticut | 7 | #427 | #75 |
| Arizona | 16 | #432 | #193 |
| Indiana | 16 | #433 | #299 |
| Maryland | 12 | #444 | #233 |
| Alabama | 11 | #458 | #299 |
| Illinois | 23 | #462 | #210 |
| Wisconsin | 10 | #497 | #212 |
| Louisiana | 9 | #511 | #423 |
| Ohio | 20 | #520 | #243 |
| Virginia | 14 | #553 | #199 |
| Tennessee | 13 | #581 | #454 |
| South Carolina | 8 | #583 | #286 |
| Minnesota | 8 | #627 | #350 |
| North Carolina | 16 | #645 | #308 |
| Washington | 10 | #648 | #232 |
| Georgia | 13 | #770 | #261 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 779 | #398 | — | — |
| 2024 | 880 | #352 | — | — |
| 2023 | 934 | #330 | — | — |
| 2022 | 993 | #325 | — | — |
| 2021 | 1,059 | #301 | — | — |
| 2020 | 1,145 | #270 | — | — |
| 2019 | 1,237 | #268 | — | — |
| 2018 | 1,365 | #236 | — | — |
| 2017 | 1,606 | #196 | — | — |
| 2016 | 1,606 | #200 | — | — |
| 2015 | 1,714 | #190 | — | — |
| 2014 | 1,773 | #185 | — | — |
| 2013 | 1,699 | #191 | 6 | #11,430 |
| 2012 | 1,697 | #188 | — | — |
| 2011 | 1,740 | #179 | — | — |
| 2010 | 1,751 | #176 | — | — |
| 2009 | 1,705 | #191 | — | — |
| 2008 | 1,737 | #194 | — | — |
| 2007 | 1,788 | #186 | — | — |
| 2006 | 1,814 | #194 | — | — |
| 2005 | 1,618 | #215 | — | — |
| 2004 | 1,683 | #200 | 7 | #9,435 |
| 2003 | 1,734 | #186 | — | — |
| 2002 | 1,748 | #185 | — | — |
| 2001 | 1,777 | #184 | 8 | #7,918 |
| 2000 | 1,287 | #249 | — | — |
| 1999 | 1,211 | #260 | — | — |
| 1998 | 1,192 | #259 | — | — |
| 1997 | 964 | #299 | — | — |
| 1996 | 834 | #334 | — | — |
| 1995 | 640 | #407 | — | — |
| 1994 | 457 | #537 | — | — |
| 1993 | 390 | #598 | — | — |
| 1992 | 400 | #582 | — | — |
| 1991 | 467 | #505 | — | — |
| 1990 | 339 | #656 | — | — |
| 1989 | 390 | #569 | 5 | #8,536 |
| 1988 | 315 | #632 | — | — |
| 1987 | 282 | #663 | — | — |
| 1986 | 283 | #652 | — | — |
| 1985 | 307 | #617 | — | — |
| 1984 | 184 | #839 | — | — |
| 1983 | 157 | #945 | — | — |
| 1982 | 203 | #796 | — | — |
| 1981 | 155 | #948 | — | — |
| 1980 | 147 | #996 | — | — |
| 1979 | 134 | #1,041 | — | — |
| 1978 | 118 | #1,107 | — | — |
| 1977 | 119 | #1,092 | — | — |
| 1976 | 116 | #1,060 | — | — |
| 1975 | 119 | #1,014 | — | — |
| 1974 | 116 | #1,035 | — | — |
| 1973 | 116 | #1,013 | — | — |
| 1972 | 123 | #979 | — | — |
| 1971 | 128 | #985 | — | — |
| 1970 | 115 | #1,064 | — | — |
| 1969 | 126 | #953 | — | — |
| 1968 | 98 | #1,070 | — | — |
| 1967 | 99 | #1,036 | — | — |
| 1966 | 105 | #1,005 | — | — |
| 1965 | 115 | #955 | — | — |
| 1964 | 104 | #1,069 | — | — |
| 1963 | 108 | #1,030 | — | — |
| 1962 | 88 | #1,170 | — | — |
| 1961 | 104 | #1,076 | — | — |
| 1960 | 101 | #1,072 | — | — |
| 1959 | 82 | #1,179 | — | — |
| 1958 | 88 | #1,133 | — | — |
| 1957 | 89 | #1,112 | — | — |
| 1956 | 65 | #1,292 | — | — |
| 1955 | 62 | #1,284 | — | — |
| 1954 | 73 | #1,170 | — | — |
| 1953 | 62 | #1,231 | — | — |
| 1952 | 70 | #1,133 | — | — |
| 1951 | 45 | #1,402 | — | — |
| 1950 | 56 | #1,236 | — | — |
| 1949 | 51 | #1,284 | — | — |
| 1948 | 62 | #1,138 | — | — |
| 1947 | 40 | #1,496 | — | — |
| 1946 | 36 | #1,470 | — | — |
| 1945 | 30 | #1,498 | — | — |
| 1944 | 37 | #1,328 | — | — |
| 1943 | 53 | #1,106 | — | — |
| 1942 | 53 | #1,080 | — | — |
| 1941 | 51 | #1,024 | — | — |
| 1940 | 40 | #1,161 | — | — |
| 1939 | 42 | #1,120 | — | — |
| 1938 | 24 | #1,572 | — | — |
| 1937 | 27 | #1,432 | — | — |
| 1936 | 21 | #1,664 | — | — |
| 1935 | 17 | #1,960 | — | — |
| 1934 | 16 | #2,041 | — | — |
| 1933 | 21 | #1,686 | — | — |
| 1932 | 21 | #1,723 | — | — |
| 1931 | 22 | #1,657 | — | — |
| 1930 | 17 | #2,067 | — | — |
| 1929 | 16 | #2,136 | — | — |
| 1928 | 21 | #1,866 | — | — |
| 1927 | 22 | #1,849 | — | — |
| 1926 | 18 | #2,119 | — | — |
| 1925 | 14 | #2,551 | — | — |
| 1924 | 24 | #1,785 | — | — |
| 1923 | 22 | #1,867 | — | — |
| 1922 | 20 | #1,988 | — | — |
| 1921 | 28 | #1,594 | — | — |
| 1920 | 24 | #1,727 | — | — |
| 1919 | 28 | #1,503 | — | — |
| 1918 | 29 | #1,471 | — | — |
| 1917 | 32 | #1,295 | — | — |
| 1916 | 27 | #1,422 | — | — |
| 1915 | 36 | #1,145 | — | — |
| 1914 | 21 | #1,408 | — | — |
| 1913 | 21 | #1,250 | — | — |
| 1912 | 18 | #1,271 | — | — |
| 1911 | 11 | #1,498 | — | — |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,472 | — | — |
| 1909 | 8 | #1,674 | — | — |
| 1907 | 5 | #2,212 | — | — |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,767 | — | — |
| 1901 | 6 | #1,568 | — | — |
| 1900 | 6 | #1,831 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).