Meaning not yet researched.
Joaquin: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 925 in 2025. Its best rank was #275 in 2008.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #275 in 2008; #355 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Joaquin in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#355 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 2008, at #275.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Joaquin: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 925 boys in 2025. Peak: #275 in 2008 · most boys in one year: 1,245 (2008).
In 2025, 925 US boys were named Joaquin, making it the 355th most common boys’ name of the year, down 15 places from #340 in 2024. That is 86 fewer than the 1,011 boys named Joaquin in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #275, reached in 2008. That year also had the most boys given the name: 1,245. For comparison, it was #321 in 2015 and #822 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Joaquin in 123 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1886 with 6 babies. In all, 35,654 US babies have been given the name, 0.1% of them girls and 99.8% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 9,899 babies named Joaquin.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 9,999 US boys were named Joaquin; the busiest of those years was 2021, with 1,083. In 2025 that was about 1 in 1,847 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Joaquin ranked highest in California in 2025, at #162 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Rarer spellings such as Juaquin, Joachim and Joaquim are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
No related spellings pass our data threshold.
Rare spellings summarised here: Juaquin (1,498), Joachim (1,203), Joaquim (964), Joquan (172), Joakim (150), Achim (27), Gioacchino (21), Joakin (17), Joequan (13), Joquin (11).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Joaquin in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 19 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 239 | #162 | #160 |
| Texas | 223 | #165 | #188 |
| District of Columbia | 5 | #186 | #132 |
| New Mexico | 11 | #188 | #112 |
| Oregon | 19 | #225 | #284 |
| Arizona | 33 | #246 | #219 |
| Illinois | 41 | #272 | #290 |
| Nevada | 11 | #288 | #475 |
| Colorado | 22 | #299 | #234 |
| Idaho | 7 | #354 | #302 |
| Washington | 21 | #355 | #372 |
| Oklahoma | 13 | #363 | #400 |
| Florida | 52 | #376 | #298 |
| Maryland | 12 | #422 | #332 |
| South Carolina | 11 | #454 | #707 |
| Virginia | 16 | #480 | #561 |
| Indiana | 14 | #501 | #497 |
| Kansas | 6 | #555 | #439 |
| Minnesota | 9 | #563 | #673 |
| New York | 27 | #574 | #474 |
| Massachusetts | 8 | #584 | #772 |
| Georgia | 17 | #607 | #527 |
| Utah | 6 | #659 | — |
| North Carolina | 14 | #661 | #578 |
| Kentucky | 6 | #663 | — |
| New Jersey | 10 | #675 | #565 |
| Missouri | 8 | #681 | #698 |
| Wisconsin | 6 | #732 | #535 |
| Ohio | 11 | #772 | #1,293 |
| Michigan | 9 | #801 | #735 |
| Tennessee | 8 | #810 | #862 |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | #959 | #633 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 925 | #355 |
| 2024 | — | — | 1,011 | #340 |
| 2023 | — | — | 999 | #335 |
| 2022 | — | — | 1,029 | #329 |
| 2021 | — | — | 1,083 | #309 |
| 2020 | — | — | 1,083 | #307 |
| 2019 | — | — | 1,006 | #332 |
| 2018 | — | — | 954 | #347 |
| 2017 | — | — | 906 | #364 |
| 2016 | — | — | 1,003 | #346 |
| 2015 | — | — | 1,082 | #321 |
| 2014 | — | — | 1,045 | #327 |
| 2013 | — | — | 953 | #340 |
| 2012 | — | — | 970 | #326 |
| 2011 | — | — | 950 | #328 |
| 2010 | — | — | 1,030 | #309 |
| 2009 | — | — | 1,117 | #295 |
| 2008 | 5 | #18,826 | 1,245 | #275 |
| 2007 | — | — | 1,180 | #290 |
| 2006 | — | — | 1,225 | #285 |
| 2005 | — | — | 847 | #350 |
| 2004 | — | — | 711 | #385 |
| 2003 | — | — | 559 | #452 |
| 2002 | 7 | #12,811 | 467 | #495 |
| 2001 | — | — | 454 | #502 |
| 2000 | — | — | 367 | #563 |
| 1999 | — | — | 377 | #540 |
| 1998 | — | — | 354 | #557 |
| 1997 | — | — | 312 | #584 |
| 1996 | — | — | 305 | #590 |
| 1995 | 5 | #14,400 | 311 | #581 |
| 1994 | — | — | 298 | #604 |
| 1993 | — | — | 299 | #593 |
| 1992 | 6 | #12,428 | 270 | #628 |
| 1991 | — | — | 256 | #640 |
| 1990 | — | — | 280 | #599 |
| 1989 | — | — | 263 | #606 |
| 1988 | 5 | #12,642 | 228 | #629 |
| 1987 | — | — | 239 | #587 |
| 1986 | — | — | 222 | #599 |
| 1985 | — | — | 255 | #550 |
| 1984 | 5 | #11,106 | 247 | #550 |
| 1983 | — | — | 232 | #552 |
| 1982 | — | — | 248 | #546 |
| 1981 | — | — | 219 | #578 |
| 1980 | — | — | 270 | #520 |
| 1979 | — | — | 258 | #529 |
| 1978 | 5 | #10,413 | 217 | #570 |
| 1977 | 5 | #10,264 | 206 | #587 |
| 1976 | 5 | #9,889 | 248 | #509 |
| 1975 | — | — | 250 | #507 |
| 1974 | — | — | 204 | #562 |
| 1973 | 5 | #8,951 | 217 | #534 |
| 1972 | — | — | 188 | #581 |
| 1971 | — | — | 179 | #620 |
| 1970 | — | — | 163 | #637 |
| 1969 | — | — | 135 | #679 |
| 1968 | — | — | 114 | #709 |
| 1967 | — | — | 120 | #680 |
| 1966 | — | — | 102 | #732 |
| 1965 | — | — | 111 | #707 |
| 1964 | — | — | 118 | #711 |
| 1963 | — | — | 109 | #743 |
| 1962 | — | — | 92 | #795 |
| 1961 | — | — | 90 | #805 |
| 1960 | — | — | 94 | #793 |
| 1959 | — | — | 91 | #803 |
| 1958 | — | — | 95 | #764 |
| 1957 | — | — | 85 | #820 |
| 1956 | — | — | 87 | #801 |
| 1955 | — | — | 64 | #935 |
| 1954 | — | — | 66 | #910 |
| 1953 | — | — | 59 | #936 |
| 1952 | — | — | 85 | #764 |
| 1951 | — | — | 74 | #820 |
| 1950 | — | — | 69 | #822 |
| 1949 | — | — | 65 | #852 |
| 1948 | — | — | 57 | #915 |
| 1947 | — | — | 55 | #961 |
| 1946 | — | — | 48 | #972 |
| 1945 | — | — | 58 | #824 |
| 1944 | — | — | 52 | #885 |
| 1943 | — | — | 41 | #1,067 |
| 1942 | — | — | 49 | #952 |
| 1941 | — | — | 52 | #881 |
| 1940 | — | — | 38 | #1,057 |
| 1939 | — | — | 55 | #825 |
| 1938 | — | — | 48 | #917 |
| 1937 | — | — | 40 | #1,007 |
| 1936 | — | — | 46 | #911 |
| 1935 | — | — | 38 | #1,049 |
| 1934 | — | — | 50 | #891 |
| 1933 | — | — | 40 | #1,022 |
| 1932 | — | — | 49 | #932 |
| 1931 | — | — | 52 | #894 |
| 1930 | — | — | 73 | #746 |
| 1929 | — | — | 58 | #873 |
| 1928 | — | — | 68 | #791 |
| 1927 | — | — | 66 | #823 |
| 1926 | — | — | 56 | #899 |
| 1925 | — | — | 57 | #893 |
| 1924 | — | — | 53 | #972 |
| 1923 | — | — | 57 | #906 |
| 1922 | — | — | 70 | #806 |
| 1921 | — | — | 45 | #1,055 |
| 1920 | — | — | 59 | #900 |
| 1919 | — | — | 44 | #1,029 |
| 1918 | — | — | 55 | #899 |
| 1917 | — | — | 38 | #1,086 |
| 1916 | — | — | 38 | #1,050 |
| 1915 | — | — | 32 | #1,152 |
| 1914 | — | — | 28 | #1,083 |
| 1913 | — | — | 26 | #980 |
| 1912 | — | — | 13 | #1,394 |
| 1911 | — | — | 6 | #1,639 |
| 1910 | — | — | 9 | #1,162 |
| 1908 | — | — | 10 | #916 |
| 1907 | — | — | 5 | #1,451 |
| 1906 | — | — | 5 | #1,333 |
| 1904 | — | — | 5 | #1,301 |
| 1903 | — | — | 5 | #1,211 |
| 1897 | — | — | 5 | #1,145 |
| 1886 | — | — | 6 | #903 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).