Meaning not yet researched.
Jannah: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 140 in 2025. Its best rank was #1,515 in 2024.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #1,515 in 2024; #1,520 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Jannah in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#1,520 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 2024, at #1,515.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Jannah: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 140 girls in 2025. Peak: #1,515 in 2024 · most girls in one year: 143 (2024).
In 2025, 140 US girls were named Jannah, making it the 1,520th most common girls’ name of the year, down 5 places from #1,515 in 2024. That is 3 fewer than the 143 girls named Jannah in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #1,515, reached in 2024. That year also had the most girls given the name: 143. For comparison, it was #2,116 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.
Social Security card records list Jannah in 52 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1970 with 5 babies. In all, 2,558 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 878 babies named Jannah.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 1,049 US girls were named Jannah; the busiest of those years was 2024, with 143. In 2025 that was about 1 in 11,480 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Jannah ranked highest in Minnesota in 2025, at #519 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Jana (46,223 babies since 1880), Janae (18,058 babies since 1880), Janna (16,097 babies since 1880) and Janay (5,832 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Jaiannah and Jayannah are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Jaiannah (30), Jayannah (18).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Jannah in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 40 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 10 | #519 | — |
| Illinois | 17 | #584 | #1,351 |
| New Jersey | 10 | #741 | — |
| Pennsylvania | 10 | #889 | #806 |
| Virginia | 5 | #1,263 | — |
| Michigan | 5 | #1,304 | — |
| Ohio | 5 | #1,563 | — |
| New York | 8 | #1,582 | #1,851 |
| California | 14 | #1,616 | #1,680 |
| Texas | 12 | #1,847 | — |
| Florida | 6 | #2,006 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 140 | #1,520 | — | — |
| 2024 | 143 | #1,515 | — | — |
| 2023 | 120 | #1,715 | — | — |
| 2022 | 93 | #2,074 | — | — |
| 2021 | 79 | #2,319 | — | — |
| 2020 | 88 | #2,088 | — | — |
| 2019 | 109 | #1,854 | — | — |
| 2018 | 90 | #2,122 | — | — |
| 2017 | 95 | #2,061 | — | — |
| 2016 | 92 | #2,120 | — | — |
| 2015 | 91 | #2,116 | — | — |
| 2014 | 110 | #1,844 | — | — |
| 2013 | 83 | #2,244 | — | — |
| 2012 | 77 | #2,412 | — | — |
| 2011 | 72 | #2,521 | — | — |
| 2010 | 59 | #2,919 | — | — |
| 2009 | 69 | #2,657 | — | — |
| 2008 | 67 | #2,729 | — | — |
| 2007 | 73 | #2,550 | — | — |
| 2006 | 75 | #2,468 | — | — |
| 2005 | 60 | #2,769 | — | — |
| 2004 | 51 | #3,042 | — | — |
| 2003 | 55 | #2,815 | — | — |
| 2002 | 51 | #2,912 | — | — |
| 2001 | 45 | #3,111 | — | — |
| 2000 | 30 | #4,112 | — | — |
| 1999 | 39 | #3,270 | — | — |
| 1998 | 34 | #3,519 | — | — |
| 1997 | 26 | #4,170 | — | — |
| 1996 | 30 | #3,670 | — | — |
| 1995 | 27 | #3,925 | — | — |
| 1994 | 26 | #4,054 | — | — |
| 1993 | 26 | #4,030 | — | — |
| 1992 | 20 | #4,926 | — | — |
| 1991 | 15 | #6,062 | — | — |
| 1990 | 22 | #4,428 | — | — |
| 1989 | 11 | #7,167 | — | — |
| 1988 | 15 | #5,429 | — | — |
| 1987 | 10 | #6,993 | — | — |
| 1986 | 16 | #4,816 | — | — |
| 1985 | 19 | #4,191 | — | — |
| 1984 | 12 | #5,664 | — | — |
| 1983 | 10 | #6,397 | — | — |
| 1982 | 8 | #7,751 | — | — |
| 1981 | 13 | #5,378 | — | — |
| 1980 | 15 | #4,818 | — | — |
| 1979 | 15 | #4,704 | — | — |
| 1977 | 8 | #7,136 | — | — |
| 1976 | 6 | #8,542 | — | — |
| 1975 | 6 | #8,379 | — | — |
| 1974 | 7 | #7,177 | — | — |
| 1970 | 5 | #8,491 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).