Meaning not yet researched.
Evelynn: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 1,012 in 2025. Its best rank was #301 in 2025.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Its highest rank in 146 years of records is this year’s. Every baby recorded as Evelynn in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#301 for US girls in 2025, its highest rank in 146 years of records.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Evelynn: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 1,012 girls in 2025. Peak: #301 in 2025 · most girls in one year: 1,030 (2019).
In 2025, 1,012 US girls were named Evelynn, making it the 301st most common girls’ name of the year, up 3 places from #304 in 2024. That is 4 fewer than the 1,016 girls named Evelynn in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #301, reached in this year, 2025. The most girls given the name in a single year was 1,030, in 2019. For comparison, it was #441 in 2015 and #2,814 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Evelynn in 111 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1914 with 11 babies. In all, 16,064 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 7,212 babies named Evelynn.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 9,715 US girls were named Evelynn; the busiest of those years was 2019, with 1,030. In 2025 that was about 1 in 1,588 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Evelynn ranked highest in Kentucky in 2025, at #148 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Evelyn (641,662 babies since 1880), Evalyn (9,567 babies since 1880), Evelin (7,430 babies since 1880) and Evelyne (4,177 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Evalynne, Ivylynn and Ivalynn are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Evalynne (247), Ivylynn (164), Ivalynn (17).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Evelynn in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 10 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | 30 | #148 | #345 |
| Kansas | 22 | #151 | #238 |
| West Virginia | 10 | #159 | — |
| Missouri | 38 | #162 | #288 |
| Utah | 26 | #173 | #380 |
| Nebraska | 13 | #174 | #334 |
| Ohio | 63 | #178 | #345 |
| Montana | 6 | #180 | #151 |
| Maine | 6 | #182 | — |
| Wisconsin | 30 | #182 | #192 |
| New Mexico | 8 | #194 | #295 |
| Oregon | 19 | #194 | #350 |
| Michigan | 45 | #202 | #293 |
| South Dakota | 6 | #203 | — |
| Idaho | 11 | #204 | #393 |
| Indiana | 34 | #205 | #243 |
| Iowa | 16 | #207 | #374 |
| Washington | 34 | #213 | #278 |
| Louisiana | 20 | #216 | #608 |
| Tennessee | 33 | #240 | #523 |
| South Carolina | 20 | #250 | #600 |
| Oklahoma | 16 | #253 | #184 |
| Minnesota | 21 | #266 | #240 |
| Alabama | 18 | #271 | #862 |
| Colorado | 21 | #290 | #327 |
| Pennsylvania | 38 | #290 | #372 |
| Illinois | 36 | #297 | #446 |
| Texas | 107 | #319 | #445 |
| Arizona | 22 | #323 | #443 |
| Virginia | 21 | #385 | #419 |
| Georgia | 29 | #389 | #747 |
| Arkansas | 8 | #395 | #611 |
| Connecticut | 7 | #418 | — |
| North Carolina | 24 | #456 | #576 |
| Florida | 35 | #523 | #695 |
| Nevada | 5 | #552 | #573 |
| Massachusetts | 8 | #648 | #768 |
| California | 48 | #649 | #524 |
| New York | 23 | #709 | #1,164 |
| Maryland | 5 | #882 | — |
| New Jersey | 5 | #1,236 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1,012 | #301 | — | — |
| 2024 | 1,016 | #304 | — | — |
| 2023 | 976 | #319 | — | — |
| 2022 | 963 | #333 | — | — |
| 2021 | 1,025 | #317 | — | — |
| 2020 | 943 | #328 | — | — |
| 2019 | 1,030 | #311 | — | — |
| 2018 | 957 | #337 | — | — |
| 2017 | 945 | #342 | — | — |
| 2016 | 848 | #390 | — | — |
| 2015 | 719 | #441 | — | — |
| 2014 | 737 | #435 | — | — |
| 2013 | 541 | #549 | — | — |
| 2012 | 530 | #557 | — | — |
| 2011 | 518 | #563 | — | — |
| 2010 | 387 | #725 | — | — |
| 2009 | 302 | #902 | — | — |
| 2008 | 247 | #1,060 | — | — |
| 2007 | 233 | #1,112 | — | — |
| 2006 | 209 | #1,163 | — | — |
| 2005 | 160 | #1,357 | — | — |
| 2004 | 122 | #1,604 | — | — |
| 2003 | 116 | #1,657 | — | — |
| 2002 | 119 | #1,566 | — | — |
| 2001 | 71 | #2,269 | — | — |
| 2000 | 57 | #2,604 | — | — |
| 1999 | 50 | #2,756 | — | — |
| 1998 | 31 | #3,756 | — | — |
| 1997 | 32 | #3,569 | — | — |
| 1996 | 25 | #4,226 | — | — |
| 1995 | 27 | #3,915 | — | — |
| 1994 | 18 | #5,315 | — | — |
| 1993 | 25 | #4,140 | — | — |
| 1992 | 21 | #4,737 | — | — |
| 1991 | 21 | #4,701 | — | — |
| 1990 | 21 | #4,566 | — | — |
| 1989 | 18 | #4,923 | — | — |
| 1988 | 14 | #5,689 | — | — |
| 1987 | 9 | #7,554 | — | — |
| 1986 | 13 | #5,533 | — | — |
| 1985 | 16 | #4,698 | — | — |
| 1984 | 9 | #6,976 | — | — |
| 1983 | 11 | #5,932 | — | — |
| 1982 | 15 | #4,775 | — | — |
| 1981 | 15 | #4,801 | — | — |
| 1980 | 11 | #6,035 | — | — |
| 1979 | 10 | #6,334 | — | — |
| 1978 | 11 | #5,672 | — | — |
| 1976 | 7 | #7,539 | — | — |
| 1975 | 5 | #9,511 | — | — |
| 1974 | 9 | #5,898 | — | — |
| 1973 | 12 | #4,644 | — | — |
| 1972 | 13 | #4,366 | — | — |
| 1971 | 7 | #6,813 | — | — |
| 1970 | 6 | #7,343 | — | — |
| 1969 | 10 | #4,808 | — | — |
| 1968 | 12 | #4,067 | — | — |
| 1967 | 6 | #6,259 | — | — |
| 1966 | 7 | #5,431 | — | — |
| 1965 | 11 | #4,025 | — | — |
| 1964 | 14 | #3,569 | — | — |
| 1963 | 16 | #3,225 | — | — |
| 1962 | 10 | #4,351 | — | — |
| 1961 | 12 | #3,843 | — | — |
| 1960 | 12 | #3,767 | — | — |
| 1959 | 17 | #2,899 | — | — |
| 1958 | 17 | #2,895 | — | — |
| 1957 | 16 | #2,968 | — | — |
| 1956 | 22 | #2,410 | — | — |
| 1955 | 13 | #3,270 | — | — |
| 1954 | 18 | #2,619 | — | — |
| 1953 | 8 | #4,344 | — | — |
| 1952 | 10 | #3,627 | — | — |
| 1951 | 9 | #3,796 | — | — |
| 1950 | 14 | #2,814 | — | — |
| 1949 | 18 | #2,360 | — | — |
| 1948 | 15 | #2,630 | — | — |
| 1947 | 19 | #2,304 | — | — |
| 1946 | 16 | #2,420 | — | — |
| 1945 | 12 | #2,643 | — | — |
| 1944 | 23 | #1,765 | — | — |
| 1943 | 15 | #2,372 | — | — |
| 1942 | 20 | #1,928 | — | — |
| 1941 | 13 | #2,440 | — | — |
| 1940 | 12 | #2,465 | — | — |
| 1939 | 12 | #2,461 | — | — |
| 1938 | 11 | #2,635 | — | — |
| 1937 | 10 | #2,799 | — | — |
| 1936 | 10 | #2,736 | — | — |
| 1935 | 16 | #2,028 | — | — |
| 1934 | 19 | #1,789 | — | — |
| 1933 | 9 | #2,958 | — | — |
| 1932 | 8 | #3,385 | — | — |
| 1931 | 15 | #2,136 | — | — |
| 1930 | 12 | #2,587 | — | — |
| 1929 | 10 | #2,995 | — | — |
| 1928 | 18 | #2,042 | — | — |
| 1927 | 16 | #2,285 | — | — |
| 1926 | 12 | #2,771 | — | — |
| 1925 | 21 | #1,914 | — | — |
| 1924 | 23 | #1,829 | — | — |
| 1923 | 29 | #1,534 | — | — |
| 1922 | 18 | #2,140 | — | — |
| 1921 | 19 | #2,071 | — | — |
| 1920 | 21 | #1,909 | — | — |
| 1919 | 11 | #2,871 | — | — |
| 1918 | 15 | #2,312 | — | — |
| 1917 | 15 | #2,235 | — | — |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,902 | — | — |
| 1915 | 11 | #2,589 | — | — |
| 1914 | 11 | #2,171 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).