Meaning not yet researched.
Evangelina: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 195 in 2025. Its best rank was #718 in 1929.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #718 in 1929; #1,187 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Evangelina in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#1,187 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1929, at #718.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Evangelina: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 195 girls in 2025. Peak: #718 in 1929 · most girls in one year: 219 (2012).
In 2025, 195 US girls were named Evangelina, making it the 1,187th most common girls’ name of the year, up 64 places from #1,251 in 2024. That is 9 more than the 186 girls named Evangelina in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #718, reached in 1929. The most girls given the name in a single year was 219, in 2012. For comparison, it was #1,466 in 2015 and #843 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Evangelina in 116 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1908 with 6 babies. In all, 10,319 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 1,719 babies named Evangelina.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 1,582 US girls were named Evangelina; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 195. In 2025 that was about 1 in 8,242 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Evangelina ranked highest in Arizona in 2025, at #530 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Evangeline (36,771 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Evangelena are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Italian. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Evangelena (5).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Evangelina in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 44 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | 13 | #530 | #618 |
| California | 43 | #723 | #939 |
| Texas | 36 | #824 | #1,375 |
| Wisconsin | 5 | #831 | — |
| Illinois | 7 | #1,157 | #1,204 |
| Florida | 9 | #1,470 | #1,703 |
| New York | 7 | #1,705 | #1,666 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 195 | #1,187 | — | — |
| 2024 | 186 | #1,251 | — | — |
| 2023 | 149 | #1,472 | — | — |
| 2022 | 130 | #1,627 | — | — |
| 2021 | 149 | #1,445 | — | — |
| 2020 | 139 | #1,527 | — | — |
| 2019 | 139 | #1,552 | — | — |
| 2018 | 147 | #1,490 | — | — |
| 2017 | 174 | #1,335 | — | — |
| 2016 | 174 | #1,361 | — | — |
| 2015 | 157 | #1,466 | — | — |
| 2014 | 157 | #1,449 | — | — |
| 2013 | 176 | #1,331 | — | — |
| 2012 | 219 | #1,127 | — | — |
| 2011 | 185 | #1,282 | — | — |
| 2010 | 191 | #1,255 | — | — |
| 2009 | 164 | #1,427 | — | — |
| 2008 | 191 | #1,303 | — | — |
| 2007 | 182 | #1,335 | — | — |
| 2006 | 163 | #1,391 | — | — |
| 2005 | 148 | #1,437 | — | — |
| 2004 | 113 | #1,718 | — | — |
| 2003 | 118 | #1,630 | — | — |
| 2002 | 90 | #1,956 | — | — |
| 2001 | 97 | #1,822 | — | — |
| 2000 | 84 | #1,991 | — | — |
| 1999 | 91 | #1,760 | — | — |
| 1998 | 67 | #2,151 | — | — |
| 1997 | 80 | #1,854 | — | — |
| 1996 | 70 | #2,004 | — | — |
| 1995 | 72 | #1,925 | — | — |
| 1994 | 62 | #2,169 | — | — |
| 1993 | 66 | #2,075 | — | — |
| 1992 | 77 | #1,847 | — | — |
| 1991 | 84 | #1,731 | — | — |
| 1990 | 71 | #1,943 | — | — |
| 1989 | 74 | #1,812 | — | — |
| 1988 | 60 | #1,994 | — | — |
| 1987 | 65 | #1,795 | — | — |
| 1986 | 70 | #1,674 | — | — |
| 1985 | 63 | #1,791 | — | — |
| 1984 | 61 | #1,777 | — | — |
| 1983 | 82 | #1,430 | — | — |
| 1982 | 86 | #1,421 | — | — |
| 1981 | 101 | #1,273 | — | — |
| 1980 | 85 | #1,438 | — | — |
| 1979 | 91 | #1,353 | — | — |
| 1978 | 85 | #1,378 | — | — |
| 1977 | 79 | #1,420 | — | — |
| 1976 | 73 | #1,434 | — | — |
| 1975 | 96 | #1,204 | — | — |
| 1974 | 104 | #1,118 | — | — |
| 1973 | 79 | #1,294 | — | — |
| 1972 | 82 | #1,259 | — | — |
| 1971 | 94 | #1,205 | — | — |
| 1970 | 81 | #1,316 | — | — |
| 1969 | 73 | #1,333 | — | — |
| 1968 | 96 | #1,083 | — | — |
| 1967 | 82 | #1,175 | — | — |
| 1966 | 81 | #1,194 | — | — |
| 1965 | 87 | #1,137 | — | — |
| 1964 | 74 | #1,298 | — | — |
| 1963 | 84 | #1,190 | — | — |
| 1962 | 89 | #1,161 | — | — |
| 1961 | 102 | #1,086 | — | — |
| 1960 | 68 | #1,341 | — | — |
| 1959 | 96 | #1,089 | — | — |
| 1958 | 89 | #1,123 | — | — |
| 1957 | 91 | #1,097 | — | — |
| 1956 | 76 | #1,195 | — | — |
| 1955 | 76 | #1,146 | — | — |
| 1954 | 89 | #1,041 | — | — |
| 1953 | 80 | #1,079 | — | — |
| 1952 | 93 | #975 | — | — |
| 1951 | 105 | #878 | — | — |
| 1950 | 109 | #843 | — | — |
| 1949 | 117 | #804 | — | — |
| 1948 | 81 | #968 | — | — |
| 1947 | 102 | #871 | — | — |
| 1946 | 82 | #922 | — | — |
| 1945 | 87 | #812 | — | — |
| 1944 | 92 | #797 | — | — |
| 1943 | 84 | #851 | — | — |
| 1942 | 90 | #805 | — | — |
| 1941 | 74 | #848 | — | — |
| 1940 | 86 | #744 | — | — |
| 1939 | 68 | #851 | — | — |
| 1938 | 64 | #877 | — | — |
| 1937 | 60 | #891 | — | — |
| 1936 | 71 | #802 | — | — |
| 1935 | 69 | #824 | — | — |
| 1934 | 68 | #821 | — | — |
| 1933 | 73 | #772 | — | — |
| 1932 | 72 | #803 | — | — |
| 1931 | 58 | #914 | — | — |
| 1930 | 83 | #774 | — | — |
| 1929 | 96 | #718 | — | — |
| 1928 | 64 | #928 | — | — |
| 1927 | 64 | #940 | — | — |
| 1926 | 63 | #946 | — | — |
| 1925 | 36 | #1,328 | — | — |
| 1924 | 56 | #1,036 | — | — |
| 1923 | 43 | #1,184 | — | — |
| 1922 | 37 | #1,294 | — | — |
| 1921 | 29 | #1,554 | — | — |
| 1920 | 29 | #1,524 | — | — |
| 1919 | 21 | #1,817 | — | — |
| 1918 | 12 | #2,727 | — | — |
| 1917 | 20 | #1,797 | — | — |
| 1916 | 14 | #2,294 | — | — |
| 1915 | 10 | #2,768 | — | — |
| 1914 | 10 | #2,320 | — | — |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,402 | — | — |
| 1912 | 6 | #2,745 | — | — |
| 1911 | 6 | #2,287 | — | — |
| 1908 | 6 | #1,936 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).