Meaning not yet researched.
Emmaline: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 182 in 2025. Its best rank was #455 in 1880.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #455 in 1880; #1,236 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Emmaline in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#1,236 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1880, at #455.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Emmaline: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 182 girls in 2025. Peak: #455 in 1880 · most girls in one year: 313 (2014).
In 2025, 182 US girls were named Emmaline, making it the 1,236th most common girls’ name of the year, down 38 places from #1,198 in 2024. That is 16 fewer than the 198 girls named Emmaline in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #455, reached in 1880. The most girls given the name in a single year was 313, in 2014. For comparison, it was #904 in 2015 and #3,287 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Emmaline in 133 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1880 with 14 babies. In all, 7,422 US babies have been given the name, all of them girls. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 2,808 babies named Emmaline.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 2,499 US girls were named Emmaline; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 312. In 2025 that was about 1 in 8,831 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Emmaline ranked highest in Kentucky in 2025, at #594 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Emmalyn (8,847 babies since 1880), Emmeline (6,152 babies since 1880), Emmalynn (4,780 babies since 1880) and Emeline (3,612 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Emiline, Emalene and Emmiline are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Emiline (415), Emalene (97), Emmiline (58), Emmilene (25), Emmelene (10).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Emmaline in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 36 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | 7 | #594 | #520 |
| Kansas | 5 | #608 | #551 |
| Massachusetts | 7 | #704 | — |
| Utah | 5 | #741 | #347 |
| Oklahoma | 5 | #742 | — |
| Tennessee | 9 | #770 | #369 |
| Missouri | 6 | #843 | #574 |
| Virginia | 8 | #874 | #691 |
| Georgia | 10 | #932 | #672 |
| North Carolina | 9 | #1,001 | #1,016 |
| Ohio | 8 | #1,060 | #854 |
| Pennsylvania | 6 | #1,281 | #1,149 |
| Texas | 18 | #1,373 | #1,205 |
| California | 17 | #1,378 | #1,308 |
| Florida | 8 | #1,590 | #1,918 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 182 | #1,236 | — | — |
| 2024 | 198 | #1,198 | — | — |
| 2023 | 192 | #1,227 | — | — |
| 2022 | 234 | #1,075 | — | — |
| 2021 | 231 | #1,082 | — | — |
| 2020 | 262 | #973 | — | — |
| 2019 | 289 | #918 | — | — |
| 2018 | 300 | #898 | — | — |
| 2017 | 299 | #898 | — | — |
| 2016 | 312 | #898 | — | — |
| 2015 | 305 | #904 | — | — |
| 2014 | 313 | #873 | — | — |
| 2013 | 263 | #959 | — | — |
| 2012 | 297 | #891 | — | — |
| 2011 | 226 | #1,086 | — | — |
| 2010 | 204 | #1,192 | — | — |
| 2009 | 167 | #1,411 | — | — |
| 2008 | 167 | #1,422 | — | — |
| 2007 | 126 | #1,730 | — | — |
| 2006 | 106 | #1,911 | — | — |
| 2005 | 115 | #1,722 | — | — |
| 2004 | 135 | #1,490 | — | — |
| 2003 | 141 | #1,412 | — | — |
| 2002 | 131 | #1,458 | — | — |
| 2001 | 117 | #1,588 | — | — |
| 2000 | 100 | #1,745 | — | — |
| 1999 | 85 | #1,863 | — | — |
| 1998 | 91 | #1,743 | — | — |
| 1997 | 80 | #1,853 | — | — |
| 1996 | 67 | #2,064 | — | — |
| 1995 | 44 | #2,746 | — | — |
| 1994 | 52 | #2,441 | — | — |
| 1993 | 47 | #2,608 | — | — |
| 1992 | 42 | #2,839 | — | — |
| 1991 | 33 | #3,321 | — | — |
| 1990 | 25 | #4,039 | — | — |
| 1989 | 25 | #3,924 | — | — |
| 1988 | 19 | #4,532 | — | — |
| 1987 | 8 | #8,221 | — | — |
| 1986 | 17 | #4,592 | — | — |
| 1985 | 7 | #8,614 | — | — |
| 1984 | 8 | #7,594 | — | — |
| 1983 | 8 | #7,506 | — | — |
| 1982 | 9 | #7,047 | — | — |
| 1981 | 9 | #6,957 | — | — |
| 1980 | 6 | #9,424 | — | — |
| 1978 | 5 | #10,221 | — | — |
| 1977 | 6 | #8,762 | — | — |
| 1976 | 8 | #6,795 | — | — |
| 1975 | 7 | #7,382 | — | — |
| 1973 | 5 | #8,810 | — | — |
| 1969 | 5 | #7,805 | — | — |
| 1964 | 8 | #5,148 | — | — |
| 1963 | 5 | #6,899 | — | — |
| 1962 | 7 | #5,457 | — | — |
| 1960 | 9 | #4,555 | — | — |
| 1959 | 9 | #4,398 | — | — |
| 1958 | 6 | #5,615 | — | — |
| 1957 | 8 | #4,648 | — | — |
| 1956 | 8 | #4,564 | — | — |
| 1955 | 6 | #5,384 | — | — |
| 1954 | 7 | #4,806 | — | — |
| 1953 | 9 | #4,032 | — | — |
| 1952 | 9 | #3,903 | — | — |
| 1951 | 12 | #3,155 | — | — |
| 1950 | 11 | #3,287 | — | — |
| 1949 | 7 | #4,362 | — | — |
| 1948 | 10 | #3,426 | — | — |
| 1947 | 17 | #2,479 | — | — |
| 1946 | 15 | #2,513 | — | — |
| 1945 | 12 | #2,640 | — | — |
| 1944 | 13 | #2,544 | — | — |
| 1943 | 18 | #2,099 | — | — |
| 1942 | 17 | #2,143 | — | — |
| 1941 | 16 | #2,122 | — | — |
| 1940 | 15 | #2,133 | — | — |
| 1939 | 14 | #2,233 | — | — |
| 1938 | 20 | #1,768 | — | — |
| 1937 | 16 | #2,024 | — | — |
| 1936 | 22 | #1,605 | — | — |
| 1935 | 26 | #1,460 | — | — |
| 1934 | 17 | #1,944 | — | — |
| 1933 | 15 | #2,083 | — | — |
| 1932 | 16 | #2,061 | — | — |
| 1931 | 21 | #1,703 | — | — |
| 1930 | 25 | #1,582 | — | — |
| 1929 | 19 | #1,906 | — | — |
| 1928 | 18 | #2,037 | — | — |
| 1927 | 24 | #1,741 | — | — |
| 1926 | 37 | #1,286 | — | — |
| 1925 | 34 | #1,385 | — | — |
| 1924 | 28 | #1,622 | — | — |
| 1923 | 34 | #1,362 | — | — |
| 1922 | 36 | #1,316 | — | — |
| 1921 | 46 | #1,132 | — | — |
| 1920 | 36 | #1,289 | — | — |
| 1919 | 42 | #1,142 | — | — |
| 1918 | 30 | #1,421 | — | — |
| 1917 | 30 | #1,350 | — | — |
| 1916 | 34 | #1,233 | — | — |
| 1915 | 45 | #994 | — | — |
| 1914 | 24 | #1,274 | — | — |
| 1913 | 17 | #1,420 | — | — |
| 1912 | 25 | #1,041 | — | — |
| 1911 | 23 | #909 | — | — |
| 1910 | 11 | #1,451 | — | — |
| 1909 | 13 | #1,172 | — | — |
| 1908 | 11 | #1,287 | — | — |
| 1907 | 15 | #1,003 | — | — |
| 1906 | 11 | #1,179 | — | — |
| 1905 | 11 | #1,189 | — | — |
| 1904 | 6 | #1,724 | — | — |
| 1903 | 8 | #1,363 | — | — |
| 1902 | 12 | #1,041 | — | — |
| 1901 | 9 | #1,162 | — | — |
| 1900 | 10 | #1,255 | — | — |
| 1899 | 8 | #1,206 | — | — |
| 1898 | 14 | #933 | — | — |
| 1897 | 7 | #1,302 | — | — |
| 1896 | 6 | #1,467 | — | — |
| 1895 | 6 | #1,476 | — | — |
| 1894 | 7 | #1,273 | — | — |
| 1893 | 13 | #834 | — | — |
| 1892 | 10 | #977 | — | — |
| 1890 | 9 | #959 | — | — |
| 1889 | 6 | #1,184 | — | — |
| 1888 | 13 | #735 | — | — |
| 1887 | 7 | #975 | — | — |
| 1886 | 5 | #1,157 | — | — |
| 1885 | 8 | #808 | — | — |
| 1884 | 8 | #810 | — | — |
| 1881 | 6 | #768 | — | — |
| 1880 | 14 | #455 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).