Meaning not yet researched.
Eliseo: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 547 in 2025. Its best rank was #550 in 2025.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Its highest rank in 146 years of records is this year’s. Every baby recorded as Eliseo in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#550 for US boys in 2025, its highest rank in 146 years of records.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Eliseo: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 547 boys in 2025. Peak: #550 in 2025 · most boys in one year: 547 (2025).
In 2025, 547 US boys were named Eliseo, making it the 550th most common boys’ name of the year, up 80 places from #630 in 2024. That is 101 more than the 446 boys named Eliseo in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #550, reached in this year, 2025. That year also had the most boys given the name: 547. For comparison, it was #913 in 2015 and #1,039 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Eliseo in 119 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1880 with 5 babies. In all, 11,996 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 2020s, with 2,350 babies named Eliseo.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 3,421 US boys were named Eliseo; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 547. In 2025 that was about 1 in 3,123 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Eliseo ranked highest in Texas in 2025, at #267 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Elisha (30,034 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Eliceo, Elisea and Elizeo are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Eliceo (370), Elisea (234), Elizeo (160), Elisio (105), Elisey (60), Elicio (49), Elisei (31), Elisee (25), Elisya (5).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Eliseo in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 26 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 148 | #267 | #494 |
| New Mexico | 7 | #279 | — |
| California | 127 | #291 | #570 |
| Arizona | 26 | #299 | #534 |
| Colorado | 18 | #351 | #717 |
| Nevada | 8 | #371 | — |
| Oklahoma | 8 | #519 | — |
| Washington | 13 | #540 | #784 |
| Oregon | 6 | #547 | — |
| Illinois | 17 | #550 | #1,381 |
| Wisconsin | 8 | #581 | — |
| Tennessee | 12 | #606 | — |
| Maryland | 7 | #649 | #734 |
| Indiana | 9 | #685 | #936 |
| Florida | 23 | #688 | #1,127 |
| Massachusetts | 6 | #720 | — |
| Georgia | 13 | #723 | — |
| Virginia | 9 | #752 | #920 |
| Alabama | 5 | #797 | — |
| North Carolina | 10 | #834 | — |
| New Jersey | 7 | #853 | — |
| Michigan | 6 | #1,024 | — |
| Ohio | 7 | #1,048 | — |
| New York | 9 | #1,230 | #1,091 |
| Pennsylvania | 5 | #1,291 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 547 | #550 |
| 2024 | — | — | 446 | #630 |
| 2023 | — | — | 384 | #692 |
| 2022 | — | — | 392 | #688 |
| 2021 | — | — | 286 | #833 |
| 2020 | — | — | 295 | #788 |
| 2019 | — | — | 268 | #840 |
| 2018 | — | — | 285 | #794 |
| 2017 | — | — | 255 | #857 |
| 2016 | — | — | 263 | #858 |
| 2015 | — | — | 236 | #913 |
| 2014 | — | — | 221 | #954 |
| 2013 | — | — | 193 | #1,012 |
| 2012 | — | — | 216 | #944 |
| 2011 | — | — | 204 | #968 |
| 2010 | — | — | 189 | #1,025 |
| 2009 | — | — | 189 | #1,029 |
| 2008 | — | — | 178 | #1,062 |
| 2007 | — | — | 205 | #962 |
| 2006 | — | — | 182 | #1,010 |
| 2005 | — | — | 173 | #995 |
| 2004 | — | — | 160 | #1,025 |
| 2003 | — | — | 149 | #1,046 |
| 2002 | — | — | 171 | #942 |
| 2001 | — | — | 188 | #853 |
| 2000 | — | — | 164 | #930 |
| 1999 | — | — | 145 | #982 |
| 1998 | — | — | 132 | #1,026 |
| 1997 | — | — | 154 | #899 |
| 1996 | — | — | 145 | #910 |
| 1995 | — | — | 154 | #880 |
| 1994 | — | — | 138 | #937 |
| 1993 | — | — | 140 | #909 |
| 1992 | — | — | 136 | #908 |
| 1991 | — | — | 120 | #975 |
| 1990 | — | — | 117 | #964 |
| 1989 | — | — | 123 | #916 |
| 1988 | — | — | 92 | #1,026 |
| 1987 | — | — | 91 | #999 |
| 1986 | — | — | 87 | #993 |
| 1985 | — | — | 92 | #952 |
| 1984 | — | — | 86 | #952 |
| 1983 | — | — | 81 | #982 |
| 1982 | — | — | 102 | #888 |
| 1981 | — | — | 112 | #831 |
| 1980 | — | — | 101 | #891 |
| 1979 | — | — | 95 | #896 |
| 1978 | — | — | 82 | #957 |
| 1977 | — | — | 105 | #831 |
| 1976 | — | — | 69 | #1,002 |
| 1975 | — | — | 88 | #884 |
| 1974 | — | — | 66 | #1,011 |
| 1973 | — | — | 72 | #951 |
| 1972 | — | — | 56 | #1,088 |
| 1971 | — | — | 65 | #1,010 |
| 1970 | — | — | 55 | #1,104 |
| 1969 | — | — | 61 | #983 |
| 1968 | — | — | 43 | #1,152 |
| 1967 | — | — | 56 | #974 |
| 1966 | — | — | 58 | #954 |
| 1965 | — | — | 48 | #1,071 |
| 1964 | — | — | 59 | #985 |
| 1963 | — | — | 49 | #1,096 |
| 1962 | — | — | 59 | #997 |
| 1961 | — | — | 59 | #1,017 |
| 1960 | — | — | 49 | #1,121 |
| 1959 | — | — | 43 | #1,185 |
| 1958 | — | — | 60 | #983 |
| 1957 | — | — | 46 | #1,138 |
| 1956 | — | — | 52 | #1,048 |
| 1955 | — | — | 68 | #900 |
| 1954 | — | — | 46 | #1,103 |
| 1953 | — | — | 46 | #1,080 |
| 1952 | — | — | 49 | #1,035 |
| 1951 | — | — | 54 | #952 |
| 1950 | — | — | 46 | #1,039 |
| 1949 | — | — | 63 | #870 |
| 1948 | — | — | 49 | #1,007 |
| 1947 | — | — | 52 | #987 |
| 1946 | — | — | 41 | #1,083 |
| 1945 | — | — | 51 | #889 |
| 1944 | — | — | 35 | #1,123 |
| 1943 | — | — | 46 | #987 |
| 1942 | — | — | 47 | #975 |
| 1941 | — | — | 45 | #955 |
| 1940 | — | — | 34 | #1,141 |
| 1939 | — | — | 43 | #959 |
| 1938 | — | — | 35 | #1,100 |
| 1937 | — | — | 43 | #959 |
| 1936 | — | — | 36 | #1,079 |
| 1935 | — | — | 44 | #957 |
| 1934 | — | — | 47 | #921 |
| 1933 | — | — | 39 | #1,037 |
| 1932 | — | — | 44 | #996 |
| 1931 | — | — | 27 | #1,340 |
| 1930 | — | — | 34 | #1,220 |
| 1929 | — | — | 60 | #846 |
| 1928 | — | — | 55 | #906 |
| 1927 | — | — | 43 | #1,088 |
| 1926 | — | — | 41 | #1,113 |
| 1925 | — | — | 43 | #1,054 |
| 1924 | — | — | 32 | #1,298 |
| 1923 | — | — | 38 | #1,161 |
| 1922 | — | — | 32 | #1,288 |
| 1921 | — | — | 29 | #1,398 |
| 1920 | — | — | 29 | #1,356 |
| 1919 | — | — | 23 | #1,543 |
| 1918 | — | — | 18 | #1,848 |
| 1917 | — | — | 27 | #1,339 |
| 1916 | — | — | 11 | #2,424 |
| 1915 | — | — | 7 | #3,172 |
| 1914 | — | — | 10 | #2,144 |
| 1913 | — | — | 10 | #1,841 |
| 1912 | — | — | 12 | #1,446 |
| 1911 | — | — | 6 | #1,592 |
| 1910 | — | — | 7 | #1,343 |
| 1909 | — | — | 5 | #1,520 |
| 1887 | — | — | 7 | #771 |
| 1880 | — | — | 5 | #951 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).