Meaning not yet researched.
Easton: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 3,198 in 2025. Its best rank was #66 in 2018.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #66 in 2018; #110 in 2025. About 99% of babies named Easton in 2025 were boys.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#110 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 2018, at #66.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Easton: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 3,198 boys in 2025. Peak: #66 in 2018 · most boys in one year: 5,643 (2016).
In 2025, 3,198 US boys were named Easton, making it the 110th most common boys’ name of the year, down 7 places from #103 in 2024. That is 151 fewer than the 3,349 boys named Easton in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #66, reached in 2018. The most boys given the name in a single year was 5,643, in 2016. For comparison, it was #78 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.
Social Security card records list Easton in 76 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1907 with 5 babies. In all, 80,441 US babies have been given the name, 1.2% of them girls and 99% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 47,345 babies named Easton.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 45,157 US boys were named Easton; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 5,643. In 2025 that was about 1 in 534 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Easton ranked highest in West Virginia in 2025, at #21 for boys there. It was in the top 100 in 28 states (counting DC). Related spellings in the SSA files include Eastyn (1,896 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Eston, Easten and Eastin are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Eston (2,006), Easten (640), Eastin (551), Esten (238), Eastan (77), Eastynn (75), Estin (50), Estyn (6).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Easton in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 2 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | 46 | #21 | #11 |
| Vermont | 12 | #27 | #44 |
| Kentucky | 99 | #36 | #17 |
| Maine | 24 | #42 | #101 |
| Mississippi | 40 | #54 | #37 |
| Oklahoma | 66 | #56 | #28 |
| North Dakota | 18 | #57 | #9 |
| Kansas | 54 | #59 | #30 |
| Montana | 17 | #62 | #37 |
| Idaho | 32 | #63 | #41 |
| Louisiana | 63 | #66 | #41 |
| Missouri | 90 | #66 | #35 |
| Tennessee | 119 | #71 | #18 |
| Alabama | 67 | #71 | #50 |
| Ohio | 154 | #72 | #77 |
| South Dakota | 16 | #72 | #14 |
| South Carolina | 67 | #74 | #56 |
| Wisconsin | 73 | #76 | #36 |
| Indiana | 93 | #80 | #42 |
| North Carolina | 143 | #85 | #60 |
| Minnesota | 70 | #86 | #37 |
| Delaware | 12 | #86 | — |
| New Hampshire | 18 | #87 | #105 |
| Alaska | 9 | #90 | #71 |
| Georgia | 121 | #93 | #74 |
| Nebraska | 26 | #93 | #19 |
| Pennsylvania | 132 | #97 | #112 |
| Michigan | 95 | #99 | #62 |
| Virginia | 84 | #101 | #84 |
| Rhode Island | 11 | #102 | #206 |
| Iowa | 36 | #106 | #30 |
| Hawaii | 9 | #110 | #142 |
| Texas | 328 | #120 | #87 |
| New Mexico | 16 | #121 | #119 |
| Arkansas | 29 | #123 | #20 |
| Florida | 169 | #127 | #90 |
| Colorado | 55 | #128 | #114 |
| Arizona | 68 | #129 | #96 |
| Utah | 39 | #134 | #37 |
| Washington | 57 | #145 | #74 |
| Maryland | 39 | #150 | #212 |
| Oregon | 27 | #155 | #67 |
| Illinois | 72 | #163 | #88 |
| Connecticut | 21 | #167 | #209 |
| California | 181 | #206 | #203 |
| Nevada | 15 | #206 | #147 |
| Massachusetts | 28 | #218 | #283 |
| New York | 89 | #223 | #186 |
| New Jersey | 41 | #235 | #334 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 20 | #5,969 | 3,198 | #110 |
| 2024 | 28 | #4,802 | 3,349 | #103 |
| 2023 | 30 | #4,592 | 3,647 | #98 |
| 2022 | 44 | #3,552 | 4,161 | #80 |
| 2021 | 53 | #3,080 | 4,625 | #72 |
| 2020 | 41 | #3,635 | 4,654 | #73 |
| 2019 | 52 | #3,101 | 4,897 | #74 |
| 2018 | 51 | #3,172 | 5,463 | #66 |
| 2017 | 51 | #3,168 | 5,520 | #66 |
| 2016 | 61 | #2,810 | 5,643 | #66 |
| 2015 | 72 | #2,508 | 5,230 | #78 |
| 2014 | 66 | #2,659 | 4,988 | #83 |
| 2013 | 55 | #3,017 | 4,649 | #88 |
| 2012 | 52 | #3,182 | 3,943 | #96 |
| 2011 | 43 | #3,623 | 3,762 | #103 |
| 2010 | 37 | #4,049 | 2,710 | #145 |
| 2009 | 20 | #6,635 | 1,369 | #254 |
| 2008 | 30 | #4,930 | 1,105 | #300 |
| 2007 | 14 | #8,659 | 904 | #352 |
| 2006 | 14 | #8,377 | 844 | #357 |
| 2005 | 18 | #6,621 | 735 | #390 |
| 2004 | 20 | #6,044 | 619 | #420 |
| 2003 | 9 | #10,689 | 504 | #490 |
| 2002 | 13 | #7,961 | 413 | #540 |
| 2001 | 8 | #11,316 | 355 | #578 |
| 2000 | 12 | #8,182 | 344 | #581 |
| 1999 | 12 | #7,867 | 269 | #644 |
| 1998 | 13 | #7,225 | 254 | #670 |
| 1997 | 12 | #7,415 | 194 | #769 |
| 1996 | 15 | #6,150 | 168 | #842 |
| 1995 | 9 | #8,979 | 144 | #923 |
| 1994 | 7 | #10,901 | 120 | #1,013 |
| 1993 | 6 | #12,222 | 85 | #1,231 |
| 1992 | — | — | 59 | #1,514 |
| 1991 | 7 | #10,601 | 54 | #1,577 |
| 1990 | — | — | 59 | #1,472 |
| 1989 | — | — | 45 | #1,711 |
| 1988 | — | — | 25 | #2,391 |
| 1987 | — | — | 22 | #2,492 |
| 1986 | 6 | #9,880 | 32 | #1,885 |
| 1985 | — | — | 20 | #2,531 |
| 1984 | — | — | 27 | #1,998 |
| 1983 | — | — | 18 | #2,603 |
| 1982 | — | — | 10 | #4,024 |
| 1981 | — | — | 9 | #4,257 |
| 1978 | — | — | 5 | #6,086 |
| 1977 | — | — | 7 | #4,737 |
| 1975 | — | — | 6 | #4,987 |
| 1973 | — | — | 7 | #4,204 |
| 1966 | — | — | 5 | #4,110 |
| 1964 | — | — | 6 | #3,733 |
| 1963 | — | — | 7 | #3,414 |
| 1955 | — | — | 6 | #3,609 |
| 1948 | — | — | 7 | #3,081 |
| 1947 | — | — | 5 | #3,889 |
| 1944 | — | — | 5 | #3,566 |
| 1941 | — | — | 5 | #3,644 |
| 1940 | — | — | 5 | #3,592 |
| 1936 | — | — | 5 | #3,693 |
| 1935 | — | — | 7 | #3,039 |
| 1934 | — | — | 5 | #3,826 |
| 1932 | — | — | 6 | #3,482 |
| 1931 | — | — | 8 | #2,917 |
| 1930 | — | — | 5 | #4,154 |
| 1924 | — | — | 7 | #3,597 |
| 1923 | — | — | 7 | #3,568 |
| 1922 | — | — | 8 | #3,328 |
| 1921 | — | — | 6 | #3,989 |
| 1920 | — | — | 9 | #3,021 |
| 1919 | — | — | 8 | #3,185 |
| 1917 | — | — | 5 | #4,146 |
| 1916 | — | — | 10 | #2,597 |
| 1915 | — | — | 6 | #3,513 |
| 1914 | — | — | 7 | #2,727 |
| 1912 | — | — | 5 | #2,647 |
| 1907 | — | — | 5 | #1,395 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).