Meaning not yet researched.
Domingo: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 74 in 2025. Its best rank was #460 in 1944.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #460 in 1944; #2,025 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Domingo in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#2,025 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1944, at #460.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Domingo: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 74 boys in 2025. Peak: #460 in 1944 · most boys in one year: 190 (1947).
In 2025, 74 US boys were named Domingo, making it the 2,025th most common boys’ name of the year, down 161 places from #1,864 in 2024. That is 12 fewer than the 86 boys named Domingo in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #460, reached in 1944. The most boys given the name in a single year was 190, in 1947. For comparison, it was #2,307 in 2015 and #535 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Domingo in 128 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1882 with 6 babies. In all, 14,400 US babies have been given the name, 0.2% of them girls and 99.8% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1950s, with 1,634 babies named Domingo.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 778 US boys were named Domingo; the busiest of those years was 2022, with 90. In 2025 that was about 1 in 23,082 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Domingo ranked highest in Nebraska in 2025, at #452 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Dominic (194,676 babies since 1880), Dominique (74,343 babies since 1880), Dominik (10,337 babies since 1880) and Domenico (3,829 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Domingue are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Domingue (87).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Domingo in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 46 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebraska | 5 | #452 | — |
| Alabama | 6 | #702 | — |
| Florida | 9 | #1,283 | — |
| California | 11 | #1,529 | #1,565 |
| Texas | 10 | #1,683 | #1,209 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 74 | #2,025 |
| 2024 | — | — | 86 | #1,864 |
| 2023 | — | — | 82 | #1,916 |
| 2022 | — | — | 90 | #1,808 |
| 2021 | — | — | 85 | #1,823 |
| 2020 | — | — | 81 | #1,836 |
| 2019 | — | — | 76 | #1,942 |
| 2018 | — | — | 73 | #1,999 |
| 2017 | — | — | 75 | #1,924 |
| 2016 | — | — | 56 | #2,344 |
| 2015 | — | — | 57 | #2,307 |
| 2014 | — | — | 57 | #2,305 |
| 2013 | — | — | 72 | #1,934 |
| 2012 | — | — | 73 | #1,949 |
| 2011 | — | — | 59 | #2,211 |
| 2010 | — | — | 68 | #2,020 |
| 2009 | — | — | 68 | #2,037 |
| 2008 | — | — | 100 | #1,583 |
| 2007 | — | — | 94 | #1,639 |
| 2006 | — | — | 104 | #1,470 |
| 2005 | — | — | 112 | #1,345 |
| 2004 | — | — | 85 | #1,558 |
| 2003 | — | — | 98 | #1,375 |
| 2002 | — | — | 106 | #1,284 |
| 2001 | — | — | 73 | #1,619 |
| 2000 | — | — | 94 | #1,353 |
| 1999 | — | — | 104 | #1,217 |
| 1998 | — | — | 119 | #1,088 |
| 1997 | — | — | 117 | #1,083 |
| 1996 | — | — | 104 | #1,143 |
| 1995 | — | — | 103 | #1,128 |
| 1994 | — | — | 116 | #1,032 |
| 1993 | — | — | 127 | #953 |
| 1992 | — | — | 132 | #924 |
| 1991 | — | — | 125 | #955 |
| 1990 | — | — | 153 | #824 |
| 1989 | — | — | 134 | #871 |
| 1988 | — | — | 103 | #951 |
| 1987 | — | — | 139 | #783 |
| 1986 | — | — | 118 | #833 |
| 1985 | — | — | 130 | #778 |
| 1984 | — | — | 137 | #745 |
| 1983 | — | — | 125 | #780 |
| 1982 | — | — | 139 | #747 |
| 1981 | — | — | 154 | #698 |
| 1980 | — | — | 148 | #715 |
| 1979 | — | — | 145 | #718 |
| 1978 | — | — | 143 | #701 |
| 1977 | — | — | 154 | #682 |
| 1976 | — | — | 165 | #641 |
| 1975 | — | — | 172 | #619 |
| 1974 | — | — | 147 | #671 |
| 1973 | — | — | 172 | #603 |
| 1972 | — | — | 132 | #699 |
| 1971 | — | — | 155 | #661 |
| 1970 | — | — | 182 | #602 |
| 1969 | — | — | 147 | #652 |
| 1968 | — | — | 145 | #628 |
| 1967 | — | — | 148 | #616 |
| 1966 | — | — | 132 | #645 |
| 1965 | — | — | 172 | #582 |
| 1964 | — | — | 143 | #649 |
| 1963 | — | — | 167 | #608 |
| 1962 | — | — | 156 | #619 |
| 1961 | — | — | 174 | #600 |
| 1960 | — | — | 171 | #601 |
| 1959 | — | — | 161 | #608 |
| 1958 | — | — | 160 | #608 |
| 1957 | — | — | 161 | #604 |
| 1956 | — | — | 169 | #585 |
| 1955 | — | — | 173 | #561 |
| 1954 | — | — | 169 | #562 |
| 1953 | — | — | 147 | #594 |
| 1952 | — | — | 158 | #556 |
| 1951 | — | — | 174 | #517 |
| 1950 | — | — | 162 | #535 |
| 1949 | — | — | 177 | #496 |
| 1948 | — | — | 176 | #496 |
| 1947 | 5 | #5,507 | 190 | #487 |
| 1946 | — | — | 190 | #462 |
| 1945 | — | — | 137 | #514 |
| 1944 | — | — | 174 | #460 |
| 1943 | — | — | 156 | #495 |
| 1942 | — | — | 123 | #555 |
| 1941 | — | — | 146 | #487 |
| 1940 | — | — | 122 | #528 |
| 1939 | 5 | #4,405 | 141 | #480 |
| 1938 | — | — | 128 | #511 |
| 1937 | — | — | 107 | #560 |
| 1936 | — | — | 96 | #591 |
| 1935 | — | — | 132 | #497 |
| 1934 | — | — | 125 | #524 |
| 1933 | 5 | #4,374 | 116 | #529 |
| 1932 | — | — | 108 | #570 |
| 1931 | — | — | 135 | #493 |
| 1930 | — | — | 139 | #505 |
| 1929 | — | — | 141 | #495 |
| 1928 | — | — | 164 | #477 |
| 1927 | — | — | 152 | #493 |
| 1926 | — | — | 122 | #554 |
| 1925 | — | — | 142 | #511 |
| 1924 | — | — | 148 | #517 |
| 1923 | — | — | 114 | #589 |
| 1922 | — | — | 145 | #511 |
| 1921 | 6 | #4,611 | 141 | #525 |
| 1920 | — | — | 123 | #552 |
| 1919 | 5 | #4,991 | 131 | #518 |
| 1918 | — | — | 113 | #573 |
| 1917 | — | — | 113 | #556 |
| 1916 | — | — | 97 | #591 |
| 1915 | — | — | 77 | #664 |
| 1914 | — | — | 27 | #1,108 |
| 1913 | — | — | 33 | #840 |
| 1912 | — | — | 20 | #1,035 |
| 1911 | — | — | 20 | #713 |
| 1910 | — | — | 24 | #584 |
| 1909 | — | — | 23 | #547 |
| 1908 | — | — | 13 | #752 |
| 1907 | — | — | 14 | #711 |
| 1906 | — | — | 8 | #949 |
| 1905 | — | — | 11 | #755 |
| 1904 | — | — | 11 | #735 |
| 1903 | — | — | 12 | #666 |
| 1902 | — | — | 9 | #810 |
| 1888 | — | — | 9 | #715 |
| 1885 | — | — | 5 | #976 |
| 1884 | — | — | 7 | #791 |
| 1882 | — | — | 6 | #866 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).