Meaning not yet researched.
Deanna: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 85 in 2025. Its best rank was #88 in 1969.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #88 in 1969; #2,175 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Deanna in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#2,175 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1969, at #88.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Deanna: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 85 girls in 2025. Peak: #88 in 1969 · most girls in one year: 4,331 (1970).
In 2025, 85 US girls were named Deanna, making it the 2,175th most common girls’ name of the year, up 139 places from #2,314 in 2024. That is 5 more than the 80 girls named Deanna in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #88, reached in 1969. The most girls given the name in a single year was 4,331, in 1970. For comparison, it was #1,193 in 2015 and #253 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Deanna in 112 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1899 with 5 babies. In all, 134,743 US babies have been given the name, 99.8% of them girls and 0.2% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1960s, with 32,337 babies named Deanna.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 1,196 US girls were named Deanna; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 187. In 2025 that was about 1 in 18,909 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Deanna ranked highest in Georgia in 2025, at #1,106 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Diana (369,771 babies since 1880), Dianna (56,356 babies since 1880), Dena (32,535 babies since 1880) and Deana (23,476 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Deeanna, Deyonna and Deyanna are summarised on this page. The open nickname list we use links it to Dee and Deedee.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in English. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Deeanna (1,948), Deyonna (393), Deyanna (315), Dyonna (134), Deannah (107), Deyona (100), Deionna (97), Deaunna (86), Deenna (45), Dennae (5), Deyannah (5).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 47 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | 8 | #1,106 | #914 |
| Florida | 10 | #1,351 | #714 |
| Pennsylvania | 5 | #1,445 | #1,467 |
| California | 5 | #3,215 | #1,754 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 85 | #2,175 | — | — |
| 2024 | 80 | #2,314 | — | — |
| 2023 | 95 | #2,051 | — | — |
| 2022 | 97 | #2,009 | — | — |
| 2021 | 103 | #1,917 | — | — |
| 2020 | 112 | #1,771 | — | — |
| 2019 | 126 | #1,671 | — | — |
| 2018 | 147 | #1,489 | — | — |
| 2017 | 164 | #1,402 | — | — |
| 2016 | 187 | #1,289 | — | — |
| 2015 | 210 | #1,193 | — | — |
| 2014 | 233 | #1,094 | — | — |
| 2013 | 279 | #916 | — | — |
| 2012 | 281 | #917 | — | — |
| 2011 | 325 | #818 | — | — |
| 2010 | 396 | #712 | — | — |
| 2009 | 499 | #606 | — | — |
| 2008 | 525 | #595 | — | — |
| 2007 | 557 | #549 | — | — |
| 2006 | 573 | #530 | — | — |
| 2005 | 639 | #478 | — | — |
| 2004 | 674 | #451 | 5 | #11,762 |
| 2003 | 714 | #421 | — | — |
| 2002 | 855 | #348 | — | — |
| 2001 | 842 | #353 | — | — |
| 2000 | 1,051 | #303 | — | — |
| 1999 | 1,132 | #277 | — | — |
| 1998 | 1,246 | #244 | — | — |
| 1997 | 1,344 | #222 | — | — |
| 1996 | 1,390 | #210 | — | — |
| 1995 | 1,586 | #188 | — | — |
| 1994 | 1,875 | #165 | — | — |
| 1993 | 1,938 | #161 | 7 | #6,980 |
| 1992 | 1,976 | #155 | — | — |
| 1991 | 1,879 | #158 | — | — |
| 1990 | 1,854 | #159 | 7 | #6,575 |
| 1989 | 1,757 | #162 | 8 | #5,758 |
| 1988 | 1,738 | #163 | 7 | #5,908 |
| 1987 | 1,638 | #170 | 9 | #4,642 |
| 1986 | 1,664 | #164 | 5 | #6,973 |
| 1985 | 1,817 | #156 | 5 | #6,774 |
| 1984 | 1,916 | #151 | — | — |
| 1983 | 1,923 | #149 | 8 | #4,601 |
| 1982 | 1,894 | #156 | 12 | #3,529 |
| 1981 | 1,940 | #146 | — | — |
| 1980 | 1,868 | #149 | — | — |
| 1979 | 1,950 | #145 | — | — |
| 1978 | 2,033 | #136 | 11 | #3,449 |
| 1977 | 2,093 | #138 | — | — |
| 1976 | 2,116 | #128 | — | — |
| 1975 | 2,276 | #126 | 8 | #4,039 |
| 1974 | 2,558 | #115 | 12 | #2,987 |
| 1973 | 2,796 | #111 | 11 | #3,059 |
| 1972 | 3,039 | #107 | 12 | #2,858 |
| 1971 | 3,791 | #95 | 19 | #2,142 |
| 1970 | 4,331 | #90 | 13 | #2,651 |
| 1969 | 4,068 | #88 | 8 | #3,377 |
| 1968 | 3,414 | #104 | 9 | #2,956 |
| 1967 | 3,348 | #104 | 7 | #3,324 |
| 1966 | 3,298 | #105 | 10 | #2,669 |
| 1965 | 3,406 | #110 | — | — |
| 1964 | 3,575 | #115 | 7 | #3,353 |
| 1963 | 3,122 | #133 | 11 | #2,564 |
| 1962 | 3,060 | #138 | 11 | #2,548 |
| 1961 | 2,683 | #156 | — | — |
| 1960 | 2,295 | #173 | 5 | #4,162 |
| 1959 | 1,828 | #194 | — | — |
| 1958 | 1,381 | #220 | — | — |
| 1957 | 1,287 | #236 | — | — |
| 1956 | 1,207 | #238 | — | — |
| 1955 | 1,072 | #254 | — | — |
| 1954 | 980 | #268 | — | — |
| 1953 | 886 | #279 | — | — |
| 1952 | 818 | #284 | — | — |
| 1951 | 910 | #256 | — | — |
| 1950 | 891 | #253 | — | — |
| 1949 | 968 | #240 | — | — |
| 1948 | 1,063 | #228 | — | — |
| 1947 | 1,263 | #210 | — | — |
| 1946 | 1,276 | #193 | — | — |
| 1945 | 1,187 | #175 | — | — |
| 1944 | 1,304 | #167 | 6 | #3,185 |
| 1943 | 1,573 | #160 | — | — |
| 1942 | 1,447 | #160 | — | — |
| 1941 | 1,856 | #137 | 7 | #2,931 |
| 1940 | 1,802 | #136 | 7 | #2,936 |
| 1939 | 1,805 | #133 | 6 | #3,190 |
| 1938 | 2,254 | #115 | 6 | #3,251 |
| 1937 | 1,624 | #139 | 7 | #2,972 |
| 1936 | 77 | #769 | — | — |
| 1935 | 29 | #1,362 | — | — |
| 1934 | 15 | #2,107 | — | — |
| 1933 | 13 | #2,295 | — | — |
| 1932 | 6 | #4,002 | — | — |
| 1931 | 10 | #2,817 | — | — |
| 1930 | 7 | #3,738 | — | — |
| 1929 | 11 | #2,770 | — | — |
| 1928 | 8 | #3,497 | — | — |
| 1927 | 16 | #2,278 | — | — |
| 1926 | 16 | #2,282 | — | — |
| 1925 | 10 | #3,165 | — | — |
| 1924 | 20 | #2,011 | — | — |
| 1923 | 19 | #2,036 | — | — |
| 1922 | 17 | #2,204 | — | — |
| 1921 | 5 | #5,295 | — | — |
| 1920 | 5 | #5,153 | — | — |
| 1919 | 8 | #3,540 | — | — |
| 1918 | 5 | #4,998 | — | — |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,582 | — | — |
| 1915 | 5 | #4,441 | — | — |
| 1910 | 7 | #1,980 | — | — |
| 1899 | 5 | #1,659 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).