Meaning not yet researched.
Connor: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 2,211 in 2025. Its best rank was #38 in 2004.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #38 in 2004; #166 in 2025. About 99% of babies named Connor in 2025 were boys.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#166 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 2004, at #38.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Connor: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 2,211 boys in 2025. Peak: #38 in 2004 · most boys in one year: 10,049 (2004).
In 2025, 2,211 US boys were named Connor, making it the 166th most common boys’ name of the year, down 30 places from #136 in 2024. That is 400 fewer than the 2,611 boys named Connor in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #38, reached in 2004. That year also had the most boys given the name: 10,049. For comparison, it was #55 in 2015 and #3,388 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Connor in 95 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1913 with 7 babies. In all, 236,262 US babies have been given the name, 0.7% of them girls and 99% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2000s, with 86,358 babies named Connor.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 43,780 US boys were named Connor; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 7,037. In 2025 that was about 1 in 773 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Connor ranked highest in District of Columbia in 2025, at #50 for boys there. It was in the top 100 in 8 states (counting DC). Related spellings in the SSA files include Conner (57,262 babies since 1880), Conor (27,449 babies since 1880), Konnor (5,886 babies since 1880) and Konner (5,790 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Connar, Konor and Konnar are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Connar (668), Konor (302), Konnar (149), Coner (124), Conar (48), Cohner (6).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Connor in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 3 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | 15 | #50 | #144 |
| Connecticut | 63 | #50 | #44 |
| New Hampshire | 23 | #61 | #14 |
| Massachusetts | 102 | #61 | #38 |
| Rhode Island | 12 | #90 | #51 |
| New Jersey | 108 | #90 | #50 |
| Delaware | 11 | #95 | #79 |
| Pennsylvania | 123 | #100 | #31 |
| Illinois | 113 | #104 | #53 |
| Maine | 13 | #104 | #23 |
| New York | 146 | #129 | #53 |
| Virginia | 67 | #132 | #46 |
| Missouri | 54 | #135 | #44 |
| Minnesota | 48 | #135 | #45 |
| Ohio | 100 | #137 | #35 |
| Michigan | 70 | #143 | #35 |
| Maryland | 40 | #147 | #42 |
| Colorado | 45 | #158 | #54 |
| New Mexico | 12 | #164 | #72 |
| North Carolina | 77 | #165 | #49 |
| West Virginia | 11 | #172 | #36 |
| Alaska | 5 | #172 | #38 |
| Wisconsin | 35 | #177 | #53 |
| South Carolina | 31 | #179 | #39 |
| Iowa | 23 | #182 | #67 |
| Oregon | 22 | #193 | #66 |
| Florida | 110 | #199 | #58 |
| Nebraska | 13 | #199 | #63 |
| Utah | 27 | #200 | #100 |
| Tennessee | 46 | #202 | #58 |
| California | 183 | #204 | #90 |
| Nevada | 15 | #205 | #62 |
| Montana | 6 | #205 | #41 |
| Indiana | 40 | #208 | #45 |
| Louisiana | 24 | #215 | #60 |
| Kentucky | 26 | #215 | #58 |
| Idaho | 12 | #220 | #46 |
| Oklahoma | 21 | #225 | #62 |
| Hawaii | 5 | #226 | #30 |
| South Dakota | 6 | #230 | #67 |
| Washington | 34 | #233 | #52 |
| Georgia | 52 | #233 | #80 |
| Alabama | 23 | #239 | #54 |
| Arkansas | 14 | #251 | #86 |
| Kansas | 13 | #279 | #56 |
| Texas | 132 | #293 | #95 |
| Arizona | 26 | #298 | #78 |
| Mississippi | 9 | #338 | #95 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 14 | #7,573 | 2,211 | #166 |
| 2024 | 23 | #5,487 | 2,611 | #136 |
| 2023 | 23 | #5,426 | 2,861 | #126 |
| 2022 | 18 | #6,513 | 3,213 | #118 |
| 2021 | 16 | #7,033 | 3,764 | #98 |
| 2020 | 15 | #7,298 | 4,414 | #78 |
| 2019 | 29 | #4,678 | 5,161 | #68 |
| 2018 | 25 | #5,198 | 6,086 | #58 |
| 2017 | 23 | #5,549 | 6,422 | #56 |
| 2016 | 23 | #5,665 | 7,037 | #54 |
| 2015 | 22 | #5,873 | 6,772 | #55 |
| 2014 | 27 | #5,056 | 7,231 | #52 |
| 2013 | 9 | #11,221 | 7,117 | #56 |
| 2012 | 13 | #8,742 | 6,983 | #59 |
| 2011 | 11 | #9,875 | 7,410 | #54 |
| 2010 | 13 | #8,831 | 8,051 | #49 |
| 2009 | 18 | #7,126 | 8,101 | #52 |
| 2008 | 16 | #7,831 | 7,817 | #57 |
| 2007 | 18 | #7,152 | 8,330 | #55 |
| 2006 | 31 | #4,603 | 8,676 | #53 |
| 2005 | 29 | #4,605 | 9,321 | #48 |
| 2004 | 67 | #2,511 | 10,049 | #38 |
| 2003 | 40 | #3,545 | 9,670 | #43 |
| 2002 | 43 | #3,256 | 8,409 | #47 |
| 2001 | 48 | #2,971 | 8,082 | #49 |
| 2000 | 63 | #2,433 | 7,530 | #50 |
| 1999 | 75 | #2,058 | 7,597 | #48 |
| 1998 | 93 | #1,712 | 7,906 | #47 |
| 1997 | 133 | #1,306 | 7,140 | #52 |
| 1996 | 126 | #1,344 | 6,911 | #54 |
| 1995 | 123 | #1,340 | 6,619 | #55 |
| 1994 | 131 | #1,295 | 6,318 | #59 |
| 1993 | 122 | #1,354 | 6,452 | #57 |
| 1992 | 134 | #1,276 | 4,609 | #80 |
| 1991 | 54 | #2,361 | 2,462 | #133 |
| 1990 | 7 | #10,445 | 1,377 | #221 |
| 1989 | 15 | #5,609 | 937 | #266 |
| 1988 | 7 | #9,475 | 787 | #293 |
| 1987 | 8 | #8,153 | 585 | #342 |
| 1986 | 5 | #11,295 | 276 | #536 |
| 1985 | — | — | 177 | #661 |
| 1984 | — | — | 154 | #703 |
| 1983 | — | — | 142 | #726 |
| 1982 | — | — | 89 | #953 |
| 1981 | — | — | 95 | #923 |
| 1980 | 6 | #9,320 | 77 | #1,031 |
| 1979 | — | — | 63 | #1,129 |
| 1978 | — | — | 56 | #1,189 |
| 1977 | — | — | 25 | #1,956 |
| 1976 | — | — | 18 | #2,436 |
| 1975 | — | — | 16 | #2,553 |
| 1974 | — | — | 9 | #3,616 |
| 1973 | — | — | 7 | #4,140 |
| 1972 | — | — | 15 | #2,449 |
| 1971 | — | — | 15 | #2,477 |
| 1970 | — | — | 9 | #3,323 |
| 1969 | — | — | 15 | #2,231 |
| 1968 | — | — | 11 | #2,598 |
| 1967 | — | — | 7 | #3,304 |
| 1966 | — | — | 9 | #2,812 |
| 1965 | — | — | 7 | #3,295 |
| 1964 | — | — | 10 | #2,695 |
| 1963 | — | — | 5 | #4,150 |
| 1962 | — | — | 5 | #4,157 |
| 1961 | — | — | 5 | #4,177 |
| 1960 | — | — | 10 | #2,717 |
| 1957 | — | — | 8 | #3,065 |
| 1955 | — | — | 9 | #2,804 |
| 1954 | — | — | 5 | #3,926 |
| 1953 | — | — | 5 | #3,913 |
| 1951 | — | — | 6 | #3,415 |
| 1950 | — | — | 6 | #3,388 |
| 1949 | — | — | 9 | #2,645 |
| 1948 | — | — | 8 | #2,823 |
| 1947 | — | — | 5 | #3,825 |
| 1946 | — | — | 6 | #3,239 |
| 1945 | — | — | 5 | #3,407 |
| 1943 | — | — | 6 | #3,283 |
| 1942 | — | — | 6 | #3,284 |
| 1941 | — | — | 5 | #3,597 |
| 1939 | — | — | 5 | #3,585 |
| 1938 | — | — | 7 | #2,918 |
| 1937 | — | — | 6 | #3,235 |
| 1930 | — | — | 5 | #4,108 |
| 1927 | — | — | 6 | #3,857 |
| 1924 | — | — | 9 | #3,068 |
| 1923 | — | — | 7 | #3,531 |
| 1922 | — | — | 6 | #3,942 |
| 1921 | — | — | 9 | #3,026 |
| 1920 | — | — | 10 | #2,807 |
| 1919 | — | — | 5 | #4,282 |
| 1917 | — | — | 5 | #4,097 |
| 1916 | — | — | 6 | #3,582 |
| 1915 | — | — | 8 | #2,870 |
| 1913 | — | — | 7 | #2,315 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).