Meaning not yet researched.
Conley: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 53 in 2025. Its best rank was #709 in 1905.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #709 in 1905; #2,521 in 2025. About 54% of babies named Conley in 2025 were boys.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#2,521 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1905, at #709.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Conley: US boys and girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 53 boys in 2025. Peak: #709 in 1905 · most boys in one year: 77 (2011).
In 2025, 53 US boys were named Conley, making it the 2,521st most common boys’ name of the year, down 203 places from #2,318 in 2024. That is 8 fewer than the 61 boys named Conley in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #709, reached in 1905. The most boys given the name in a single year was 77, in 2011. For comparison, it was #1,934 in 2015 and #1,207 in 1950.
In 2025, 46 US girls were named Conley, making it the 3,351st most common girls’ name of the year, up 305 places from #3,656 in 2024. That is 4 more than the 42 girls named Conley in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #3,083, reached in 2022. That year also had the most girls given the name: 53. For comparison, it was #6,786 in 2015 and unranked in 1950.
Social Security card records list Conley in 130 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1882 with 5 babies. In all, 4,661 US babies have been given the name, 13% of them girls and 87% boys. Its busiest decade was the 2010s, with 895 babies named Conley.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 609 US boys were named Conley; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 76. In 2025 that was about 1 in 32,228 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Conley ranked highest in Tennessee in 2025, at #1,063 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Rarer spellings such as Conlee, Konley and Connley are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in English. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
No related spellings pass our data threshold.
Rare spellings summarised here: Conlee (228), Konley (40), Connley (16).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Conley in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 50 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee | 5 | #1,063 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46 | #3,351 | 53 | #2,521 |
| 2024 | 42 | #3,656 | 61 | #2,318 |
| 2023 | 34 | #4,211 | 69 | #2,113 |
| 2022 | 53 | #3,083 | 62 | #2,301 |
| 2021 | 38 | #3,897 | 55 | #2,444 |
| 2020 | 36 | #3,942 | 50 | #2,557 |
| 2019 | 41 | #3,680 | 59 | #2,317 |
| 2018 | 14 | #7,858 | 53 | #2,450 |
| 2017 | 32 | #4,413 | 71 | #2,005 |
| 2016 | 27 | #5,030 | 76 | #1,927 |
| 2015 | 18 | #6,786 | 75 | #1,934 |
| 2014 | 17 | #7,064 | 71 | #2,005 |
| 2013 | 19 | #6,528 | 58 | #2,231 |
| 2012 | 14 | #8,307 | 72 | #1,965 |
| 2011 | 21 | #6,195 | 77 | #1,836 |
| 2010 | 12 | #9,361 | 68 | #2,016 |
| 2009 | 12 | #9,523 | 46 | #2,669 |
| 2008 | 9 | #11,807 | 40 | #2,957 |
| 2007 | 14 | #8,629 | 38 | #3,036 |
| 2006 | 8 | #12,674 | 26 | #3,804 |
| 2005 | 11 | #9,597 | 25 | #3,734 |
| 2004 | 9 | #10,886 | 22 | #4,037 |
| 2003 | 7 | #12,698 | 33 | #2,938 |
| 2002 | 9 | #10,416 | 31 | #2,957 |
| 2001 | 5 | #15,876 | 23 | #3,635 |
| 2000 | — | — | 28 | #3,089 |
| 1999 | 5 | #14,910 | 31 | #2,736 |
| 1998 | 8 | #10,319 | 21 | #3,509 |
| 1997 | 10 | #8,495 | 24 | #3,085 |
| 1996 | — | — | 18 | #3,705 |
| 1995 | 10 | #8,218 | 26 | #2,778 |
| 1994 | 9 | #8,981 | 22 | #3,127 |
| 1993 | — | — | 20 | #3,266 |
| 1992 | — | — | 19 | #3,358 |
| 1991 | 5 | #13,607 | 18 | #3,349 |
| 1990 | — | — | 15 | #3,808 |
| 1989 | — | — | 14 | #3,840 |
| 1988 | — | — | 16 | #3,238 |
| 1987 | — | — | 12 | #3,769 |
| 1986 | — | — | 21 | #2,529 |
| 1985 | — | — | 9 | #4,390 |
| 1984 | — | — | 13 | #3,300 |
| 1983 | — | — | 17 | #2,691 |
| 1982 | — | — | 20 | #2,443 |
| 1981 | — | — | 17 | #2,694 |
| 1980 | — | — | 10 | #3,897 |
| 1979 | — | — | 13 | #3,205 |
| 1978 | — | — | 12 | #3,248 |
| 1977 | — | — | 8 | #4,235 |
| 1976 | — | — | 22 | #2,125 |
| 1975 | — | — | 16 | #2,552 |
| 1974 | — | — | 12 | #2,981 |
| 1973 | — | — | 27 | #1,702 |
| 1972 | — | — | 21 | #1,980 |
| 1971 | — | — | 16 | #2,383 |
| 1970 | — | — | 22 | #1,898 |
| 1969 | — | — | 19 | #1,920 |
| 1968 | — | — | 30 | #1,434 |
| 1967 | — | — | 23 | #1,613 |
| 1966 | — | — | 17 | #1,902 |
| 1965 | — | — | 23 | #1,633 |
| 1964 | — | — | 17 | #1,983 |
| 1963 | 5 | #6,773 | 33 | #1,357 |
| 1962 | — | — | 20 | #1,814 |
| 1961 | — | — | 17 | #2,008 |
| 1960 | — | — | 20 | #1,821 |
| 1959 | — | — | 22 | #1,727 |
| 1958 | — | — | 32 | #1,376 |
| 1957 | — | — | 28 | #1,493 |
| 1956 | — | — | 23 | #1,649 |
| 1955 | — | — | 31 | #1,375 |
| 1954 | — | — | 36 | #1,245 |
| 1953 | — | — | 38 | #1,216 |
| 1952 | — | — | 29 | #1,411 |
| 1951 | — | — | 39 | #1,156 |
| 1950 | — | — | 36 | #1,207 |
| 1949 | — | — | 51 | #972 |
| 1948 | — | — | 51 | #976 |
| 1947 | — | — | 39 | #1,163 |
| 1946 | — | — | 53 | #915 |
| 1945 | — | — | 37 | #1,061 |
| 1944 | — | — | 53 | #871 |
| 1943 | — | — | 41 | #1,061 |
| 1942 | — | — | 41 | #1,061 |
| 1941 | — | — | 37 | #1,068 |
| 1940 | — | — | 33 | #1,163 |
| 1939 | — | — | 51 | #859 |
| 1938 | — | — | 37 | #1,066 |
| 1937 | — | — | 28 | #1,269 |
| 1936 | — | — | 34 | #1,121 |
| 1935 | — | — | 35 | #1,103 |
| 1934 | — | — | 50 | #890 |
| 1933 | — | — | 43 | #962 |
| 1932 | — | — | 45 | #982 |
| 1931 | — | — | 42 | #1,035 |
| 1930 | — | — | 47 | #993 |
| 1929 | — | — | 48 | #976 |
| 1928 | — | — | 38 | #1,148 |
| 1927 | — | — | 47 | #1,022 |
| 1926 | — | — | 42 | #1,098 |
| 1925 | — | — | 44 | #1,045 |
| 1924 | — | — | 55 | #946 |
| 1923 | — | — | 38 | #1,159 |
| 1922 | — | — | 42 | #1,087 |
| 1921 | — | — | 39 | #1,146 |
| 1920 | — | — | 36 | #1,211 |
| 1919 | — | — | 36 | #1,168 |
| 1918 | — | — | 39 | #1,098 |
| 1917 | — | — | 38 | #1,081 |
| 1916 | — | — | 45 | #955 |
| 1915 | — | — | 44 | #941 |
| 1914 | — | — | 29 | #1,059 |
| 1913 | — | — | 18 | #1,218 |
| 1912 | — | — | 15 | #1,233 |
| 1911 | — | — | 9 | #1,208 |
| 1910 | — | — | 12 | #941 |
| 1908 | — | — | 5 | #1,426 |
| 1907 | — | — | 7 | #1,119 |
| 1906 | — | — | 7 | #1,030 |
| 1905 | — | — | 12 | #709 |
| 1904 | — | — | 5 | #1,245 |
| 1903 | — | — | 5 | #1,156 |
| 1902 | — | — | 6 | #1,036 |
| 1900 | — | — | 11 | #796 |
| 1895 | — | — | 5 | #1,115 |
| 1894 | — | — | 6 | #977 |
| 1892 | — | — | 7 | #874 |
| 1886 | — | — | 6 | #863 |
| 1885 | — | — | 5 | #968 |
| 1882 | — | — | 5 | #966 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).