Meaning not yet researched.
Camilo: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 503 in 2025. Its best rank was #451 in 2022.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #451 in 2022; #585 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Camilo in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#585 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 2022, at #451.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Camilo: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 503 boys in 2025. Peak: #451 in 2022 · most boys in one year: 682 (2022).
In 2025, 503 US boys were named Camilo, making it the 585th most common boys’ name of the year, down 60 places from #525 in 2024. That is 64 fewer than the 567 boys named Camilo in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #451, reached in 2022. That year also had the most boys given the name: 682. For comparison, it was #951 in 2015 and #1,705 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Camilo in 112 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1909 with 5 babies. In all, 9,058 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 2020s, with 3,093 babies named Camilo.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 3,995 US boys were named Camilo; the busiest of those years was 2022, with 682. In 2025 that was about 1 in 3,396 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Camilo ranked highest in California in 2025, at #281 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Kamil (2,643 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Camillo, Kamilo and Camelo are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Camillo (930), Kamilo (353), Camelo (50), Kamelo (50), Camello (15), Kamylo (8).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Camilo in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 29 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 131 | #281 | #621 |
| Nevada | 9 | #328 | — |
| Florida | 42 | #443 | #808 |
| Texas | 76 | #443 | #767 |
| Illinois | 24 | #448 | #786 |
| Connecticut | 6 | #450 | — |
| Oregon | 7 | #483 | — |
| New York | 32 | #505 | #831 |
| Colorado | 10 | #544 | — |
| Georgia | 18 | #568 | — |
| New Jersey | 12 | #578 | #463 |
| Maryland | 7 | #638 | — |
| Arizona | 10 | #645 | #908 |
| North Carolina | 13 | #685 | #909 |
| Wisconsin | 6 | #698 | #780 |
| Pennsylvania | 12 | #709 | — |
| Massachusetts | 6 | #710 | — |
| Kentucky | 5 | #729 | — |
| Washington | 8 | #742 | #713 |
| Tennessee | 8 | #790 | — |
| Virginia | 8 | #810 | #804 |
| Ohio | 10 | #812 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 503 | #585 |
| 2024 | — | — | 567 | #525 |
| 2023 | — | — | 629 | #481 |
| 2022 | — | — | 682 | #451 |
| 2021 | — | — | 454 | #614 |
| 2020 | — | — | 258 | #876 |
| 2019 | — | — | 256 | #867 |
| 2018 | — | — | 216 | #958 |
| 2017 | — | — | 224 | #934 |
| 2016 | — | — | 206 | #990 |
| 2015 | — | — | 217 | #951 |
| 2014 | — | — | 217 | #968 |
| 2013 | — | — | 196 | #1,000 |
| 2012 | — | — | 258 | #839 |
| 2011 | — | — | 194 | #998 |
| 2010 | — | — | 195 | #1,005 |
| 2009 | — | — | 229 | #901 |
| 2008 | — | — | 157 | #1,155 |
| 2007 | — | — | 157 | #1,139 |
| 2006 | — | — | 159 | #1,102 |
| 2005 | — | — | 150 | #1,100 |
| 2004 | — | — | 158 | #1,036 |
| 2003 | — | — | 114 | #1,262 |
| 2002 | — | — | 97 | #1,358 |
| 2001 | — | — | 110 | #1,217 |
| 2000 | — | — | 79 | #1,516 |
| 1999 | — | — | 73 | #1,534 |
| 1998 | — | — | 76 | #1,465 |
| 1997 | — | — | 71 | #1,488 |
| 1996 | — | — | 74 | #1,414 |
| 1995 | — | — | 63 | #1,509 |
| 1994 | — | — | 60 | #1,546 |
| 1993 | — | — | 64 | #1,462 |
| 1992 | — | — | 70 | #1,352 |
| 1991 | — | — | 52 | #1,617 |
| 1990 | — | — | 84 | #1,189 |
| 1989 | — | — | 62 | #1,393 |
| 1988 | — | — | 53 | #1,452 |
| 1987 | — | — | 57 | #1,297 |
| 1986 | — | — | 50 | #1,404 |
| 1985 | — | — | 56 | #1,284 |
| 1984 | — | — | 60 | #1,178 |
| 1983 | — | — | 46 | #1,380 |
| 1982 | — | — | 40 | #1,543 |
| 1981 | — | — | 34 | #1,696 |
| 1980 | — | — | 46 | #1,393 |
| 1979 | — | — | 27 | #1,949 |
| 1978 | — | — | 28 | #1,836 |
| 1977 | — | — | 37 | #1,516 |
| 1976 | — | — | 35 | #1,542 |
| 1975 | — | — | 25 | #1,895 |
| 1974 | — | — | 37 | #1,413 |
| 1973 | — | — | 25 | #1,785 |
| 1972 | — | — | 22 | #1,935 |
| 1971 | — | — | 33 | #1,495 |
| 1970 | — | — | 28 | #1,622 |
| 1969 | — | — | 18 | #1,988 |
| 1968 | — | — | 24 | #1,616 |
| 1967 | — | — | 26 | #1,510 |
| 1966 | — | — | 13 | #2,231 |
| 1965 | — | — | 17 | #1,924 |
| 1964 | — | — | 22 | #1,703 |
| 1963 | — | — | 13 | #2,315 |
| 1962 | — | — | 15 | #2,125 |
| 1961 | — | — | 19 | #1,885 |
| 1960 | — | — | 32 | #1,404 |
| 1959 | — | — | 14 | #2,213 |
| 1958 | — | — | 22 | #1,685 |
| 1957 | — | — | 14 | #2,197 |
| 1956 | — | — | 20 | #1,766 |
| 1955 | — | — | 14 | #2,154 |
| 1954 | — | — | 14 | #2,124 |
| 1953 | — | — | 23 | #1,598 |
| 1952 | — | — | 19 | #1,754 |
| 1951 | — | — | 11 | #2,387 |
| 1950 | — | — | 19 | #1,705 |
| 1949 | — | — | 14 | #2,037 |
| 1948 | — | — | 19 | #1,710 |
| 1947 | — | — | 19 | #1,742 |
| 1946 | — | — | 13 | #2,045 |
| 1945 | — | — | 9 | #2,417 |
| 1944 | — | — | 11 | #2,209 |
| 1943 | — | — | 18 | #1,705 |
| 1942 | — | — | 16 | #1,808 |
| 1941 | — | — | 9 | #2,510 |
| 1940 | — | — | 13 | #1,995 |
| 1939 | — | — | 7 | #2,866 |
| 1938 | — | — | 11 | #2,205 |
| 1937 | — | — | 11 | #2,220 |
| 1936 | — | — | 14 | #1,882 |
| 1935 | — | — | 16 | #1,767 |
| 1934 | — | — | 10 | #2,414 |
| 1933 | — | — | 10 | #2,393 |
| 1932 | — | — | 18 | #1,725 |
| 1931 | — | — | 13 | #2,112 |
| 1930 | — | — | 24 | #1,499 |
| 1929 | — | — | 17 | #1,856 |
| 1928 | — | — | 18 | #1,837 |
| 1927 | — | — | 19 | #1,809 |
| 1926 | — | — | 14 | #2,212 |
| 1925 | — | — | 21 | #1,687 |
| 1924 | — | — | 16 | #2,056 |
| 1923 | — | — | 10 | #2,791 |
| 1922 | — | — | 17 | #1,964 |
| 1921 | — | — | 21 | #1,712 |
| 1920 | — | — | 11 | #2,628 |
| 1919 | — | — | 12 | #2,400 |
| 1918 | — | — | 20 | #1,720 |
| 1917 | — | — | 15 | #2,002 |
| 1916 | — | — | 15 | #1,967 |
| 1915 | — | — | 13 | #2,084 |
| 1909 | — | — | 5 | #1,487 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).