Meaning not yet researched.
Bobbye: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 0 in 2025. Its best rank was #530 in 1933.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Fewer than five US girls were given it in 2025. It peaked at #530 in 1933. No US babies were recorded with the name Bobbye in 2025.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
Given to fewer than five US girls in 2025; it peaked at #530 in 1933.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Bobbye: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 0 girls in 2025. Peak: #530 in 1933 · most girls in one year: 155 (1931).
Fewer than five US girls were named Bobbye in 2025, so it does not appear in that year’s SSA list for girls. Its best rank for girls was #530, reached in 1933. The most girls given the name in a single year was 155, in 1931. For comparison, it was unranked (under five girls) in 2015 and #1,294 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Bobbye in 80 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1911 with 7 babies. In all, 3,269 US babies have been given the name, 97% of them girls and 3.0% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1930s, with 1,212 babies named Bobbye.
In none of the 10 years from 2016 to 2025 were five or more US girls named Bobbye.
Related spellings in the SSA files include Bobby (324,728 babies since 1880), Bobbie (107,049 babies since 1880) and Bobbi (24,280 babies since 1880).
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Bobbye in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 7 | #11,291 | — | — |
| 1997 | 5 | #14,023 | — | — |
| 1995 | 5 | #13,694 | — | — |
| 1992 | 6 | #11,930 | — | — |
| 1988 | 5 | #12,020 | 5 | #7,400 |
| 1986 | 5 | #11,092 | — | — |
| 1985 | 5 | #10,842 | — | — |
| 1984 | 6 | #9,258 | — | — |
| 1982 | 12 | #5,572 | — | — |
| 1981 | 11 | #5,918 | — | — |
| 1980 | 7 | #8,254 | — | — |
| 1979 | 7 | #8,133 | — | — |
| 1978 | 6 | #8,664 | — | — |
| 1977 | 6 | #8,552 | — | — |
| 1976 | 12 | #4,924 | — | — |
| 1975 | 14 | #4,385 | — | — |
| 1974 | 11 | #5,042 | — | — |
| 1973 | 10 | #5,223 | — | — |
| 1972 | 9 | #5,516 | — | — |
| 1971 | 12 | #4,563 | — | — |
| 1970 | 9 | #5,445 | — | — |
| 1969 | 12 | #4,213 | — | — |
| 1968 | 8 | #5,187 | — | — |
| 1967 | 7 | #5,507 | — | — |
| 1966 | 11 | #3,981 | — | — |
| 1965 | 16 | #3,159 | — | — |
| 1964 | 25 | #2,484 | — | — |
| 1963 | 19 | #2,874 | — | — |
| 1962 | 9 | #4,563 | — | — |
| 1961 | 11 | #4,031 | — | — |
| 1960 | 14 | #3,367 | — | — |
| 1959 | 21 | #2,525 | — | — |
| 1958 | 19 | #2,674 | — | — |
| 1957 | 27 | #2,125 | — | — |
| 1956 | 47 | #1,550 | — | — |
| 1955 | 34 | #1,810 | — | — |
| 1954 | 42 | #1,561 | — | — |
| 1953 | 33 | #1,740 | — | — |
| 1952 | 50 | #1,368 | — | — |
| 1951 | 50 | #1,317 | — | — |
| 1950 | 50 | #1,294 | — | — |
| 1949 | 50 | #1,289 | — | — |
| 1948 | 52 | #1,268 | — | — |
| 1947 | 54 | #1,228 | — | — |
| 1946 | 61 | #1,089 | 6 | #3,210 |
| 1945 | 55 | #1,050 | — | — |
| 1944 | 59 | #1,018 | 7 | #2,888 |
| 1943 | 71 | #923 | 8 | #2,754 |
| 1942 | 77 | #887 | 7 | #2,961 |
| 1941 | 82 | #798 | 7 | #2,898 |
| 1940 | 62 | #912 | 6 | #3,165 |
| 1939 | 98 | #689 | 5 | #3,536 |
| 1938 | 85 | #749 | 5 | #3,576 |
| 1937 | 97 | #695 | 9 | #2,506 |
| 1936 | 116 | #611 | 5 | #3,603 |
| 1935 | 95 | #684 | — | — |
| 1934 | 139 | #545 | 7 | #3,007 |
| 1933 | 144 | #530 | 5 | #3,707 |
| 1932 | 113 | #629 | — | — |
| 1931 | 155 | #530 | 7 | #3,121 |
| 1930 | 119 | #635 | 8 | #3,053 |
| 1929 | 125 | #612 | — | — |
| 1928 | 98 | #716 | — | — |
| 1927 | 100 | #720 | — | — |
| 1926 | 73 | #866 | — | — |
| 1925 | 57 | #990 | — | — |
| 1924 | 42 | #1,228 | — | — |
| 1923 | 36 | #1,307 | — | — |
| 1922 | 25 | #1,691 | — | — |
| 1921 | 31 | #1,484 | — | — |
| 1920 | 27 | #1,589 | — | — |
| 1919 | 13 | #2,531 | — | — |
| 1918 | 23 | #1,699 | — | — |
| 1917 | 13 | #2,436 | — | — |
| 1916 | 10 | #2,854 | — | — |
| 1915 | 12 | #2,403 | — | — |
| 1914 | 5 | #3,692 | — | — |
| 1913 | 8 | #2,364 | — | — |
| 1912 | 8 | #2,182 | — | — |
| 1911 | 7 | #1,990 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).