Meaning not yet researched.
Bianca: US girls given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 594 in 2025. Its best rank was #84 in 1990.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #84 in 1990; #500 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Bianca in 2025 was a girl.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#500 for US girls in 2025. Its best year was 1990, at #84.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Bianca: US girls given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 594 girls in 2025. Peak: #84 in 1990 · most girls in one year: 3,844 (1991).
In 2025, 594 US girls were named Bianca, making it the 500th most common girls’ name of the year, down 38 places from #462 in 2024. That is 87 fewer than the 681 girls named Bianca in 2024. Its best rank for girls was #84, reached in 1990. The most girls given the name in a single year was 3,844, in 1991. For comparison, it was #381 in 2015 and #2,192 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Bianca in 109 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1905 with 5 babies. In all, 77,759 US babies have been given the name, 99.7% of them girls and 0.3% boys. Its busiest decade was the 1990s, with 28,634 babies named Bianca.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 7,249 US girls were named Bianca; the busiest of those years was 2016, with 853. In 2025 that was about 1 in 2,706 of the girls in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Bianca ranked highest in Delaware in 2025, at #145 for girls there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Blanche (87,648 babies since 1880), Blanca (25,653 babies since 1880), Bianka (2,534 babies since 1880) and Vianca (1,893 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Bionca, Byanca and Byanka are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Wikidata records this spelling as a given name in Corsican, Dutch, English, French, Italian, Romanian and Spanish. That is where the name is used, not necessarily where it comes from.
Rare spellings summarised here: Bionca (716), Byanca (433), Byanka (279), Biannca (155), Beonca (151), Bia (128), Beanca (61), Bionka (55), Biancca (25), Beunca (17), Biyanca (5), Binca (5), and more.
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Bianca in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US girls. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five girls got the name, so 20 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | 6 | #145 | #130 |
| Florida | 73 | #259 | #232 |
| New Jersey | 28 | #296 | #193 |
| Massachusetts | 15 | #378 | #187 |
| Connecticut | 7 | #407 | #230 |
| New York | 42 | #413 | #245 |
| Maryland | 12 | #434 | #358 |
| North Carolina | 25 | #444 | #718 |
| California | 74 | #448 | #286 |
| Washington | 15 | #457 | #709 |
| South Carolina | 10 | #477 | #319 |
| Oregon | 7 | #494 | #295 |
| Texas | 64 | #501 | #387 |
| Minnesota | 10 | #509 | #328 |
| Indiana | 13 | #515 | #706 |
| Wisconsin | 9 | #522 | #449 |
| Pennsylvania | 20 | #522 | #327 |
| Nevada | 5 | #529 | #293 |
| Virginia | 14 | #546 | #440 |
| Illinois | 18 | #547 | #413 |
| Utah | 7 | #548 | #342 |
| Michigan | 14 | #560 | #504 |
| Iowa | 5 | #580 | #614 |
| Kentucky | 7 | #583 | #646 |
| Arizona | 10 | #640 | #436 |
| Alabama | 7 | #646 | — |
| Ohio | 13 | #716 | #544 |
| Colorado | 7 | #721 | #624 |
| Missouri | 7 | #743 | #977 |
| Georgia | 13 | #754 | #979 |
| Tennessee | 5 | #1,155 | #686 |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 594 | #500 | — | — |
| 2024 | 681 | #462 | — | — |
| 2023 | 659 | #467 | — | — |
| 2022 | 747 | #423 | — | — |
| 2021 | 699 | #448 | — | — |
| 2020 | 726 | #420 | — | — |
| 2019 | 687 | #454 | — | — |
| 2018 | 769 | #404 | — | — |
| 2017 | 834 | #374 | — | — |
| 2016 | 853 | #386 | — | — |
| 2015 | 859 | #381 | — | — |
| 2014 | 907 | #361 | — | — |
| 2013 | 1,057 | #303 | — | — |
| 2012 | 1,028 | #313 | — | — |
| 2011 | 1,121 | #283 | — | — |
| 2010 | 1,178 | #280 | — | — |
| 2009 | 1,398 | #236 | — | — |
| 2008 | 1,652 | #205 | — | — |
| 2007 | 1,977 | #176 | — | — |
| 2006 | 1,941 | #183 | — | — |
| 2005 | 1,926 | #177 | — | — |
| 2004 | 1,986 | #172 | 6 | #10,106 |
| 2003 | 2,054 | #162 | 8 | #7,928 |
| 2002 | 1,954 | #169 | — | — |
| 2001 | 2,070 | #156 | 6 | #9,388 |
| 2000 | 1,956 | #170 | — | — |
| 1999 | 1,947 | #163 | — | — |
| 1998 | 2,019 | #157 | — | — |
| 1997 | 2,362 | #134 | 5 | #9,421 |
| 1996 | 2,523 | #123 | 6 | #8,060 |
| 1995 | 2,505 | #128 | 10 | #5,540 |
| 1994 | 2,932 | #111 | 5 | #8,930 |
| 1993 | 3,212 | #101 | 7 | #6,896 |
| 1992 | 3,385 | #97 | 11 | #4,903 |
| 1991 | 3,844 | #89 | 13 | #4,256 |
| 1990 | 3,829 | #84 | 19 | #3,179 |
| 1989 | 3,593 | #91 | 34 | #2,071 |
| 1988 | 2,637 | #108 | 18 | #2,977 |
| 1987 | 920 | #268 | 10 | #4,271 |
| 1986 | 831 | #294 | 5 | #6,829 |
| 1985 | 790 | #304 | 6 | #5,861 |
| 1984 | 664 | #347 | 6 | #5,640 |
| 1983 | 940 | #253 | — | — |
| 1982 | 775 | #314 | 6 | #5,707 |
| 1981 | 678 | #344 | 7 | #5,009 |
| 1980 | 634 | #369 | — | — |
| 1979 | 613 | #369 | 7 | #4,899 |
| 1978 | 593 | #357 | — | — |
| 1977 | 526 | #397 | — | — |
| 1976 | 393 | #473 | — | — |
| 1975 | 249 | #630 | — | — |
| 1974 | 183 | #762 | — | — |
| 1973 | 171 | #781 | — | — |
| 1972 | 98 | #1,127 | — | — |
| 1971 | 111 | #1,084 | — | — |
| 1970 | 104 | #1,127 | — | — |
| 1969 | 104 | #1,087 | — | — |
| 1968 | 81 | #1,210 | — | — |
| 1967 | 75 | #1,227 | — | — |
| 1966 | 51 | #1,571 | — | — |
| 1965 | 41 | #1,770 | — | — |
| 1964 | 44 | #1,750 | — | — |
| 1963 | 34 | #2,022 | — | — |
| 1962 | 42 | #1,758 | — | — |
| 1961 | 40 | #1,811 | — | — |
| 1960 | 48 | #1,617 | — | — |
| 1959 | 55 | #1,450 | — | — |
| 1958 | 40 | #1,704 | — | — |
| 1957 | 43 | #1,641 | — | — |
| 1956 | 27 | #2,107 | — | — |
| 1955 | 33 | #1,843 | — | — |
| 1954 | 20 | #2,455 | — | — |
| 1953 | 32 | #1,759 | — | — |
| 1952 | 34 | #1,686 | — | — |
| 1951 | 20 | #2,251 | — | — |
| 1950 | 20 | #2,192 | — | — |
| 1949 | 17 | #2,421 | — | — |
| 1948 | 7 | #4,237 | — | — |
| 1947 | 14 | #2,775 | — | — |
| 1946 | 8 | #3,696 | — | — |
| 1945 | 8 | #3,416 | — | — |
| 1944 | 5 | #4,632 | — | — |
| 1942 | 7 | #3,781 | — | — |
| 1941 | 7 | #3,599 | — | — |
| 1936 | 6 | #3,746 | — | — |
| 1933 | 10 | #2,709 | — | — |
| 1932 | 12 | #2,513 | — | — |
| 1930 | 5 | #4,634 | — | — |
| 1929 | 7 | #3,721 | — | — |
| 1928 | 15 | #2,298 | — | — |
| 1927 | 12 | #2,719 | — | — |
| 1926 | 6 | #4,369 | — | — |
| 1925 | 9 | #3,394 | — | — |
| 1924 | 9 | #3,430 | — | — |
| 1923 | 11 | #2,940 | — | — |
| 1922 | 11 | #2,982 | — | — |
| 1921 | 10 | #3,192 | — | — |
| 1920 | 5 | #5,072 | — | — |
| 1919 | 18 | #1,996 | — | — |
| 1918 | 9 | #3,266 | — | — |
| 1917 | 18 | #1,931 | — | — |
| 1916 | 5 | #4,500 | — | — |
| 1915 | 15 | #2,057 | — | — |
| 1914 | 8 | #2,661 | — | — |
| 1913 | 11 | #1,901 | — | — |
| 1912 | 5 | #3,024 | — | — |
| 1909 | 6 | #1,987 | — | — |
| 1907 | 5 | #2,110 | — | — |
| 1905 | 5 | #1,970 | — | — |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).