Meaning not yet researched.
Amadeo: US boys given the name each year, 1880 to 2025, from Social Security card applications. 84 in 2025. Its best rank was #1,197 in 1910.
US births per year · SSA card applications
Peaked at #1,197 in 1910; #1,869 in 2025. Every baby recorded as Amadeo in 2025 was a boy.
Baby name · US data 1880–2025
#1,869 for US boys in 2025. Its best year was 1910, at #1,197.
Hover, tap or use the arrow keys for any year. Years with fewer than five babies of a sex are not published by SSA and show as zero.
Amadeo: US boys given the name each year from 1880 to 2025. 84 boys in 2025. Peak: #1,197 in 1910 · most boys in one year: 84 (2025).
In 2025, 84 US boys were named Amadeo, making it the 1,869th most common boys’ name of the year, up 341 places from #2,210 in 2024. That is 19 more than the 65 boys named Amadeo in 2024. Its best rank for boys was #1,197, reached in 1910. The most boys given the name in a single year was 84, in 2025. For comparison, it was #4,184 in 2015 and #3,334 in 1950.
Social Security card records list Amadeo in 111 years of the 146 from 1880 to 2025, starting in 1909 with 5 babies. In all, 1,960 US babies have been given the name, all of them boys. Its busiest decade was the 2020s, with 412 babies named Amadeo.
Over the 10 years from 2016 to 2025, 553 US boys were named Amadeo; the busiest of those years was 2025, with 84. In 2025 that was about 1 in 20,334 of the boys in SSA’s list for the year.
Among the states, Amadeo ranked highest in Colorado in 2025, at #627 for boys there. It was not in the top 100 of any state. Related spellings in the SSA files include Amado (4,769 babies since 1880) and Amadeus (1,720 babies since 1880). Rarer spellings such as Teofilo, Amedeo and Amadi are summarised on this page.
Meaning not yet researched.
We publish a meaning only with a cited source and a confidence label, and never generate one. Meanings are being researched for the most common names first.
Rare spellings summarised here: Teofilo (1,040), Amedeo (667), Amadi (454), Gottlieb (320), Theophil (208), Amedee (70), Teofil (68), Amedio (63), Bohumil (56), Amadia (5), Amidio (5).
Numbers are all-time US births. Links come from Wikidata’s “said to be the same as” (P460, CC0) and our spelling rule: at most two letters different, with the same sound pattern.
No nicknames listed for Amadeo in the open dataset we use.
Source: carltonnorthern/nicknames (Apache-2.0).
US boys. Rank within each state. SSA leaves out states where fewer than five boys got the name, so 48 are not listed.
| State | Births 2025 | Rank 2025 | Rank 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado | 8 | #627 | — |
| Texas | 23 | #1,013 | — |
| California | 17 | #1,152 | — |
Births and national rank for each year SSA lists the name, newest first.
| Year | Girls | Girls rank | Boys | Boys rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | — | 84 | #1,869 |
| 2024 | — | — | 65 | #2,210 |
| 2023 | — | — | 60 | #2,316 |
| 2022 | — | — | 79 | #1,951 |
| 2021 | — | — | 64 | #2,196 |
| 2020 | — | — | 60 | #2,267 |
| 2019 | — | — | 35 | #3,263 |
| 2018 | — | — | 24 | #4,230 |
| 2017 | — | — | 48 | #2,598 |
| 2016 | — | — | 34 | #3,297 |
| 2015 | — | — | 24 | #4,184 |
| 2014 | — | — | 31 | #3,460 |
| 2013 | — | — | 35 | #3,128 |
| 2012 | — | — | 33 | #3,301 |
| 2011 | — | — | 22 | #4,364 |
| 2010 | — | — | 18 | #5,056 |
| 2009 | — | — | 23 | #4,285 |
| 2008 | — | — | 29 | #3,650 |
| 2007 | — | — | 27 | #3,798 |
| 2006 | — | — | 31 | #3,389 |
| 2005 | — | — | 31 | #3,242 |
| 2004 | — | — | 18 | #4,612 |
| 2003 | — | — | 38 | #2,622 |
| 2002 | — | — | 17 | #4,512 |
| 2001 | — | — | 26 | #3,322 |
| 2000 | — | — | 15 | #4,796 |
| 1999 | — | — | 19 | #3,843 |
| 1998 | — | — | 15 | #4,419 |
| 1997 | — | — | 16 | #4,067 |
| 1996 | — | — | 26 | #2,840 |
| 1995 | — | — | 19 | #3,435 |
| 1994 | — | — | 20 | #3,329 |
| 1993 | — | — | 20 | #3,249 |
| 1992 | — | — | 24 | #2,837 |
| 1991 | — | — | 11 | #4,772 |
| 1990 | — | — | 17 | #3,471 |
| 1989 | — | — | 20 | #2,993 |
| 1988 | — | — | 13 | #3,714 |
| 1987 | — | — | 11 | #3,973 |
| 1986 | — | — | 11 | #3,892 |
| 1985 | — | — | 6 | #5,811 |
| 1984 | — | — | 12 | #3,468 |
| 1983 | — | — | 12 | #3,417 |
| 1982 | — | — | 8 | #4,614 |
| 1981 | — | — | 9 | #4,160 |
| 1980 | — | — | 6 | #5,549 |
| 1979 | — | — | 9 | #4,080 |
| 1978 | — | — | 10 | #3,622 |
| 1977 | — | — | 13 | #3,043 |
| 1976 | — | — | 6 | #4,955 |
| 1975 | — | — | 10 | #3,437 |
| 1974 | — | — | 10 | #3,327 |
| 1973 | — | — | 9 | #3,456 |
| 1972 | — | — | 5 | #5,009 |
| 1970 | — | — | 8 | #3,532 |
| 1969 | — | — | 5 | #4,430 |
| 1967 | — | — | 7 | #3,240 |
| 1965 | — | — | 9 | #2,784 |
| 1964 | — | — | 14 | #2,208 |
| 1963 | — | — | 9 | #2,865 |
| 1961 | — | — | 10 | #2,709 |
| 1960 | — | — | 11 | #2,537 |
| 1959 | — | — | 6 | #3,630 |
| 1958 | — | — | 10 | #2,648 |
| 1957 | — | — | 7 | #3,264 |
| 1956 | — | — | 12 | #2,366 |
| 1955 | — | — | 14 | #2,142 |
| 1954 | — | — | 8 | #2,949 |
| 1953 | — | — | 11 | #2,395 |
| 1952 | — | — | 8 | #2,878 |
| 1951 | — | — | 7 | #3,073 |
| 1950 | — | — | 6 | #3,334 |
| 1949 | — | — | 10 | #2,458 |
| 1948 | — | — | 6 | #3,329 |
| 1947 | — | — | 6 | #3,376 |
| 1946 | — | — | 5 | #3,543 |
| 1945 | — | — | 15 | #1,775 |
| 1944 | — | — | 6 | #3,117 |
| 1943 | — | — | 9 | #2,565 |
| 1942 | — | — | 11 | #2,271 |
| 1941 | — | — | 8 | #2,663 |
| 1940 | — | — | 11 | #2,184 |
| 1939 | — | — | 12 | #2,056 |
| 1938 | — | — | 10 | #2,332 |
| 1937 | — | — | 6 | #3,185 |
| 1936 | — | — | 12 | #2,066 |
| 1935 | — | — | 5 | #3,663 |
| 1934 | — | — | 11 | #2,271 |
| 1933 | — | — | 5 | #3,659 |
| 1931 | — | — | 9 | #2,658 |
| 1930 | — | — | 14 | #2,082 |
| 1929 | — | — | 10 | #2,599 |
| 1928 | — | — | 15 | #2,050 |
| 1927 | — | — | 12 | #2,412 |
| 1926 | — | — | 11 | #2,571 |
| 1925 | — | — | 12 | #2,439 |
| 1924 | — | — | 22 | #1,677 |
| 1923 | — | — | 17 | #1,944 |
| 1922 | — | — | 10 | #2,805 |
| 1921 | — | — | 18 | #1,907 |
| 1920 | — | — | 13 | #2,340 |
| 1919 | — | — | 9 | #2,886 |
| 1918 | — | — | 20 | #1,713 |
| 1917 | — | — | 24 | #1,441 |
| 1916 | — | — | 22 | #1,506 |
| 1915 | — | — | 18 | #1,663 |
| 1914 | — | — | 18 | #1,441 |
| 1913 | — | — | 13 | #1,499 |
| 1912 | — | — | 12 | #1,420 |
| 1910 | — | — | 8 | #1,197 |
| 1909 | — | — | 5 | #1,452 |
About the data: counts are Social Security card applications for US births, for names given to at least five babies of a sex in a year (SSA, names.zip, public domain). Ranks follow SSA’s own order: most births first, ties alphabetical. Files retrieved 2026-10-05 (checksum on our sources page).